Customer Reviews


9 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:
 (3)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent atlas
This atlas is the best imaging atlas I have encountered to date in a price range suitable for medical students. The illustrations are of superb quality, and cover a wide range of images, including CT scans, MRIs, angiograms, etc. The only real limitation of the atlas is that it does not cover any pathological anatomy. We have used the Barrett atlas for MRIs in the past,...
Published on August 22, 2005 by Asa C. Black

versus
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Comprehensive
It is a good atlas for a trainee. It includes difficult part of body with a precise label. However, it is not easy to find the one that you want since there are plenty of labels. In addition, I think it is much better if there are few sentences to elicit the information concerning the radiological imaging like certain common normal variants that one could see in the...
Published on March 29, 2000


Most Helpful First | Newest First

4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent atlas, August 22, 2005
This atlas is the best imaging atlas I have encountered to date in a price range suitable for medical students. The illustrations are of superb quality, and cover a wide range of images, including CT scans, MRIs, angiograms, etc. The only real limitation of the atlas is that it does not cover any pathological anatomy. We have used the Barrett atlas for MRIs in the past, but will probably discontinue using it since the Weir text has very similar MRIs. We will continue using the Wicke text, but the Weir text has figures comparable to a fair number of the Wicke figures, in addition to having the best array of MRIs, CT scans, angiograms, etc.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Comprehensive, March 29, 2000
By A Customer
It is a good atlas for a trainee. It includes difficult part of body with a precise label. However, it is not easy to find the one that you want since there are plenty of labels. In addition, I think it is much better if there are few sentences to elicit the information concerning the radiological imaging like certain common normal variants that one could see in the radiological imaging
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3.0 out of 5 stars great images, little additional info, February 2, 2010
Great image quality and very inclusive of several disciplines, including X-ray, CT, MRI and some ultraound made studying easier. The presentation of both axial and sagitall images was also helpful. It was howver very disheartening that the vertebral levels for each image were not identified. This made it less useful for initial studying that I had hoped it would be.
Overall a very good study tool, not great for self-taught study though
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Excelent Medical School Resource, September 13, 2009
By 
Kushal Naik "_KN" (all over the place, USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This is a great atlas that makes up where netters, sobotta and others lack, in a plethora of images esp CT and MRI. I do agree with others, that some explanation would certainly benefit this book, but this book labels just about every structure thats visible and is a great reference. I do agree that the images aren't the best or newest in this book, but for a student, it is worth buying to have. I used this book to teach myself to read scans and can now read images very very quickly. Very little ultrasound images tho, not a good book for that.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Imaging Atlas of Human Anatomy, September 23, 2008
This book was actually required for my program classes this semester. The picutres in the book are very well presented and is labeled very well. I have found it very useful in helping me prepare for my exams.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4.0 out of 5 stars atlas that is actually small enough to have around, February 10, 2007
By 
S. Holz "rad resident" (Toledo, Ohio United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This is not the most thorough cross sectional atlas available. However, the smaller size of this book compared to other anatomy references is a bonus. This book's portable size makes it easily available when needed. Has nice MRI pics that are very useful when reading studies. It is still useful to have a larger atlas available when on call, but this one works for most studies. Good value.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Best for MRI and CT, May 23, 2003
I highly reccomend this for MRI and CT images viewing. The images are very clear and capture the area of interest very well. Medical professionals will sure can rely on this atlas for normal images.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


7 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars DONT WASTE YOUR MONEY!, April 10, 2006
By 
RadRes "RadRes" (San Francisco, CA) - See all my reviews
I am a 4th year Radiology Resident at UCSF. I can't believe I spent money on the 3rd edition CD-ROM atlas a couple of years ago. If you are a radiology resident, do not buy this! The image quality is poor, the resolution is awful, the images are too small even if you decrease the screen resolution, and the cross sectional images are worse than the images we acquire with extremely outdated county hospital equipment. The cross sections from the CT brain are acquired in an oblique projection, making them difficult to compare with the images obtained at most hospitals. The MRI images are way outdated. I just pulled up some angio images to go over vascular anatomy for the upcoming oral board exam and these images are awful! No celiac axis, no detailed pelvic vasculature. I am angry and embarrassed that I spent $80 on this. Fortunately, my book stipend paid for it. I don't want you to make the same mistake. You should expect better quality images for such an expensive atlas.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Medical School Resource, June 13, 2009
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
Good for images of normal human anatomy on X-ray. Not particularly helpful at Mercer University SOM.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

An Imaging Atlas of Human Anatomy
An Imaging Atlas of Human Anatomy by Jamie Weir (Paperback - Aug. 1992)
Used & New from: $7.12
Add to wishlist See buying options