Incarnation and Resurrection: Toward a Contemporary Understanding [Paperback]

Paul D. Molnar (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: June 2007

For too long contemporary theology has downplayed the importance of both the Incarnation and the Resurrection in constructing theological systems. Molnar surveys the place of these key doctrines in the thought of ten influential theologians, including Karl Barth, Karl Rahner, Thomas F. Torrance, John Hick, and Wolfhart Pannenberg. Fair, comprehensive and balanced, his analysis, following Torrance, highlights the intrinsic connection between these two doctrines and details the necessity of resurrection as the beginning, rather than the end, of Christology.

Product Details

• Paperback: 418 pages
• Publisher: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company (June 2007)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0802809987
• ISBN-13: 978-0802809988
• Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.2 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #990,681 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars An apologetic for the unity of the incarnation and resurrection, February 18, 2012

By 

Kyle G Anderson - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Incarnation and Resurrection: Toward a Contemporary Understanding (Paperback)

Molnar's book "Incarnation and Resurrection" will probably be understood as a Barth and Torrance apology. While certainly, Molnar does this in light of opposition from modern theologians, it must be kept in mind that Molnar uses Barth and Torrance of paradigms for how he understands the very nature of theological science should be. Which, as he argues (328-329):

1. Christology must begin with Jesus Christ (this is contra Rahner, Hick, Kauffman and others who start with or include our human experience.)

2. The doctrine of the incarnation and resurrection must be held together. The resurrection was a historical event in the life of Jesus Christ that gave the first disciples faith. Only subsequently were they able to understand the incarnation of Jesus Christ. Conversely, the resurrection of Jesus Christ only has meaning in light of the incarnation. The resurrection of Jesus was a bodily resurrection of the incarnate Son of God. Thus, the starting point of Christology must be the incarnate Son of God. "Any idea whatsoever that the incarnation should be seen as the result and not the starting point for theology necessarily means a compromise of Christ's true divinity which must be acknowledged as definitive, authentic, and essential."

3. Both Jesus' full humanity AND full divinity must be treated seriously.

4. "Christology can never detach the title Christ from Jesus himself and attempt to locate the meaning of the incarnation within the community or within the world at large;"

5."Grace and revelation can never be detached from Jesus himself and located directly within our Christian experiences of faith and hope."

Clearly written, Molnar allows his theological partners to speak for themselves and only comments after letting their voices be heard. As such the reader is allowed to make up his or her mind as to the validity of the various theological claims argued. In the end, I believe Molnar's conclusion is correct: our Christology must never start with anthropology or a general doctrine of God. We must begin with the revelation of Jesus Christ as the Son or Word of God incarnate.