Amazon.com: Infallible?: An inquiry (9780385184830): Hans Kung: Books

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Infallible?: An inquiry
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Infallible?: An inquiry [Paperback]

Hans Kung (Author)
3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.



Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Editorial Reviews

Language Notes

Text: English (translation)
Original Language: German

Product Details

  • Paperback: 268 pages
  • Publisher: Doubleday (1983)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0385184832
  • ISBN-13: 978-0385184830
  • Product Dimensions: 8.3 x 5.6 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,883,540 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.7 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Important book for catholicism, September 14, 2008
By 
Joe "joe" (united states) - See all my reviews
In the book the controversial Swiss theologian Hans Kung investigates the problems of dogmatic infallibility in the Catholic Church.

He begins by discussing the fact that Popes and ecumenical councils have contradicted each other in the past.

He then goes on to explain the development of infallibility and shows that it was not always universally accepted in the Church. He also argues that the idea of bishops being direct successors to the Apostles is historically false.

He then argues from a philosophical standpoint that dogma cannot be infallible because of the limitations of human language. After this, he gives a description of his vision of the Church. One where bishops and Pope act as leaders but give more freedomg to theologians to engage in scholarship and teach doctrine. In Kung's vision, the bishops would only step in and exercise binding teaching authority when there was an "emergency" where the Church was rife with heresy and disunity
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


8 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars LIKE EVERY GREAT PROFESSOR ASKS A QUESTION NOT EASY TO ANSWER; LIKE EVERY GREAT THEOLOGIAN: PASSIONATELY IN LOVE WITH OUR CHURCH, August 11, 2007
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Infallible? An Inquiry (Hardcover)
Father Kung, the great Catholic theologian of the Conciliar age and theology professor of the present Pope (and who in fact got him a teaching job at the seminary and the rest is history), here dares open an historical and theological examination of the question of infallibility as declared at the end of the 1800's. He does so out of a great loving concern for our Church and a strong desire for us to ask, to consider and to understand (the work of any great theologian) the true meaning and development and history of that unique concept.

This book, published in 1971, really opens our eyes to the nature of our present Church and its development after the Second Vatican Council. As Father Kung wrote this book so shortly after the closing of that great Ecumenical Council, which he served at the request of the good Pope John XXIII as theological expert, it gives us a landmark by which to consider our present course as a Pilgrim Church lurching towards the Kingdom.

This important work is best considered in companionship with another two major works by Father Kung of that critical period in our Church history. Please read carefully aloing with this one Church and Truthfulness - The Future of the Church. Also good to read is his examination of the nature of our Faith in the popular On Being a Christian and his short history of our Church The Catholic Church: A Short History (Modern Library Chronicles), and as many as possible of his hundreds of thoughtful, prayerful, devoted spiritual and theological writings available here upon the amazon.

Like every excellent professor Father Kung raises questions we need to hear and to consider but cannot answer, questions which lead on to further questions and deeper vision. He raises questions he himself may not be able to answer to the complete satisfaction of everyone, but he courageously raises the questions which we must begin to consider. Our Faith can only be strengthened by, not weakened by such consideratio and reflection. Our Faith in gaining such understanding only grows stronger, and as an excellent, trained, proficient Professor of Theology, Father Kung knows what open ended questions to raise that we may grow in our Faith and strong her theological understanding.

Father Kung is a theologian we most need to read, prayerfully, thoughtfully, constantly in our post-modern times which some would have us call post-Christian. Through pursuing the prayerful and loving and committed thinking and inquiry of Father Kung, may our Faith live, and grow, and live to the fullest within our hearts and within our opening, active God-given minds and within our troubled and lost world of pain longing for the Love of God.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars The truth shall set us free..., November 2, 2010
By 
Rami Baalbaki (Steubenville, OH, United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Infallible?: An inquiry (Paperback)
Hans Kung's book seems attractive and convincing on the surface, but careful analysis reveals that time and time again Kung grossly over-exaggerates, contradicts himself, analyzes historical situations anachronistically, misquotes his sources, etc. Kung's analysis lies somewhere between historically inaccurate at best, and dishonest at worst. For those genuine truth seekers who aim not merely to confirm their subjective views but who sincerely aim at the truth, I highly recommend reading "The Historical Credibility of Hans Kung: An Inquiry and Commentary", by Joseph F. Costanzo. It is difficult for anyone without thorough historical knowledge to pick up on the plethora of errors in Kung's book; Costanzo, primarily a historian, provides a thorough and honest rebuttal to Hans Kung. He takes Kung point-by-point and refutes him emphatically. If anyone wishes to quickly see some of the more egregious errors in Kung's book, visit

http://www.amazon.com/review/R2YQ3ATQMOQ83B/ref=cm_cr_dp_cmt?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0815803702&nodeID=283155&tag=&linkCode=#wasThisHelpful

This is a comment I wrote to someone else's review of Costanzo's book. My response is a bit lengthy, but worthwhile for anyone genuinely seeking clarity on this issue.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(2)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
Great Book 0 Sep 14, 2008
See all discussions...  
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
   
Related forums



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:




i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...