The Insatiability of Human Wants: Economics and Aesthetics in Market Society [Paperback]

Regenia Gagnier (Author)

Book Description

ISBN-10: 0226278549 | ISBN-13: 978-0226278544 | Publication Date: December 1, 2000 | Edition: 1

What is the relationship between our conception of humans as producers or creators; as consumers of taste and pleasure; and as creators of value? Combining cultural history, economics, and literary criticism, Regenia Gagnier's new work traces the parallel development of economic and aesthetic theory, offering a shrewd reading of humans as workers and wanters, born of labor and desire.

The Insatiability of Human Wants begins during a key transitional moment in aesthetic and economic theory, 1871, when both disciplines underwent a turn from production to consumption models. In economics, an emphasis on the theory of value and the social relations between land, labor, and capital gave way to more individualistic models of consumerism. Similarly, in aesthetics, theories of artistic production or creativity soon bowed to models of taste, pleasure, and reception.

Using these developments as a point of departure, Gagnier deftly traces the shift in Western thought from models of production to consumption. From its exploration of early market logic and Kantian thought to its look at the aestheticization of homelessness and our own market boom, The Insatiability of Human Wants invites us to contemplate alternative interpretations of economics, aesthetics, and history itself.

Editorial Reviews

From the Inside Flap

Combining cultural history, economics, and literary criticism, Regenia Gagnier's new work traces the parallel development of economic theory and aesthetic theory, offering a shrewd reading of humans as workers and wanters, born of labor and desire. The story told in The Insatiability of Human Wants begins in the 1870s, a key transitional moment in aesthetics and economics, when both disciplines underwent a turn from production to consumption models. In economics, an emphasis on the theory of value and the social relations between land, labor, and capital gave way to more individualistic models of consumerism. Similarly, in aesthetics, theories of artistic production or creativity bowed to models of taste, pleasure, and reception. Using these developments as a point of departure, Gagnier deftly traces the shift in Western thought from models of production to models of consumption.

About the Author

Regenia Gagnier is a Professor of English at the University of Exeter. She is the author of Idylls of the Marketplace: Oscar Wilde and the Victorian Public and Subjectivities: A History of Self-Representation in Britain, 1832-1920.

Product Details

• Paperback: 262 pages
• Publisher: University Of Chicago Press; 1 edition (December 1, 2000)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0226278549
• ISBN-13: 978-0226278544
• Product Dimensions: 9 x 6 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,638,858 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A book for our times, February 2, 2007

By 

Wildeguy "wildeguy2000" (New York) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The Insatiability of Human Wants: Economics and Aesthetics in Market Society (Paperback)

Gagnier has brought together in this volume a very singular argument that is much needed in contemporary discourse with its increasing specialization and consequent (unfortunate) ignorance of fundamental concerns for each discipline. Economics and aesthetics were inseparable for Kant and Smith. With this fundamental acknowledgement Gagnier sets out to trace the history of their divorce and the unfortunate consequences that followed. Jacques Derrida was in his rather unique way of presenting his thought, the first to point out the radical importance of Kant's Critique of Judgment (Parergon) in bridging the gap between the previous critiques (pure and practical reason). Judgment as a "bridge" (the metaphor belongs to Kant) connected the supersensible and phenomenal, the theoretical and the practical. Gagnier here sets out on a mission to regain that original project. One might call it academic "bridge" but it is no game (there's ample criticism of this kind of economical thought in the book). Gagnier is acutely aware of the ramifications of the thesis for the utopian side of nineteenth century writers and she explores what happens when society does not "get it."

Gagnier works at the margins of intense academic scholarship and attempts to work between Victorian studies (with the legacy of unresolved problems Victorianists explore on a routine basis) and the larger concerns of economics. She shows how both have always influenced each other based on their common ancestry. The larger focus of the book is to show how these seemingly microscopic problems (Victorianists are increasingly concerned with economic criticism, economists with literature) are actually all around us. Whatever the problems one might find in the book's seemingly endless construction of bridges between the Victorians and contemporary economics, she deserves highest praise for her remarkable efforts. Each chapter may be found published in an array of academic journals as book reviews, essays, etc. What is unique is Gagnier's arrangement in this volume. The price of the book in my opinion is very economical and should be on any student's bookshelf.

Problems there are, both for Victorianists and economists reading this book. In particular, she does not update some of the rudest reductionist readings of Vernon Lee and Grant Allen, but prefers to place them both under one problematic of post-1870 consumer economics (I refer to the effects of the Marginalist Revolution in economics, Jevons, Walras, and Menger). This is an error and unfortunately helps to perpetuate stereotypes about late nineteenth century Victorians that scholars are presently working on discharging. Our increasing knowledge about Vernon Lee in particular makes it difficult to accept all of her thought under the banner of "psychological aesthetics." Grant Allen's "physiological aesthetics" must also be understood in terms of his self-identification as a "radical." To lump psychological and physiological aesthetics under the same rubric distorts rather than clarifies our knowledge of these intellectuals. Nevertheless I mark it off as one of the consequences of republishing material that was written for a rather different reading audience and not updated for the present volume. I am not saying that she does not stand by her original statements (obviously she does) but merely that recent scholarship has pointed in the direction of revision.

Saying that, I am still astounded by the sheer brilliance of Gagnier's intellectual scaffolding. I don't think that it is possible to esteem her efforts higher. The Insatiability of Human Wants will be the focus of much debate ironically returning us to the site where Kant and Smith began. A spot Gagnier will forever be welcoming us to explore.

0 of 2 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars interesting idea, but not well executed, February 7, 2005

By 

Russell Pittman "aging literary economist" (Takoma Park, MD USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The Insatiability of Human Wants: Economics and Aesthetics in Market Society (Paperback)

I liked the idea behind this book, and for a few pages I was agreeing with the jacket blurb that described it as the first history of economic thought with new and original insights. But the book does not deliver the goods. The author needed a co-author with a much better understanding of the history of economic thought than hers: she is applying her obviously broad expertise in aesthetics with a very superficial reading of the economic classics.
Furthermore, the quality of the book declines after about the midpoint. The book is a collection of revised academic papers, and there is nothing wrong with that -- they are tied together pretty well. But the last couple of chapters are quite superficial rants on the state of the US, the UK, and other market economies: a summary of the savings and loan crisis here, a discussion of homelessness taken from some San Francisco Chronicle articles there.
I hope Professor Gagnier will find a good economist co-author and give this topic another try.