24 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A timely reminder that Evolution still rules supreme., February 22, 2010
Published on February 12, 2010, presumably in celebration of the 201st anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin, "Inside the Human Genome: A Case for Non-Intelligent Design" is yet another book convincingly pointing out that the "modern" Creationist theory of Intelligent Design has no explanatory or predictive power, and therefore fails.
I don't recommend the Kindle edition though. The formatting of the tables and illustrations is very poor, and almost completely unreadable, and after a while I gave up on them. The text is very clear though. It would have been better if it had been formatted for the larger screen of the Kindle DX or the Kindle computer version.
Instead of examining biological structures that work very well and are very beautiful, John Avise examines plain ugly and barely functional elements of ID's latest poster child, DNA. He shows that DNA looks exactly the way it should, after a long process of evolution and tinkering, and not the masterwork of a loving and caring Intelligent Designer.
It's often forgotten, that for all its design faults, the vertebrate eye still works extremely well. Both Intelligent Design and Evolution have little trouble in explaining perfection or almost perfection.
John Avise, in less than 240 pages (in the Kindle version, the main text finishes 72% through the book before the "Notes and References"), discusses exhaustively the many design faults of the human genome. I'm not certain for whom this book is written. Certainly not the common run-of-the mill ID proponent who waxes enthusiastically over Stephen Meyer's 600+ page "Signature in the Cell". The information is presented in a very dense form, fact after fact, almost without respite.
To give two examples John Avise uses. In malarial areas, sickle cell trait provides increased resistance to malaria. Individuals are heterozygous for Haemoglobin S, a variant form of Haemoglobin A, and have a survival advantage. Individuals with sickle cell anaemia, homozygous for HbS, have a nasty and short life. They pay the price for the increased survival of heterozygotes, and the die is cast at conception. Hardly the deed of a loving and caring Intelligent Designer. So, the malarial parasite is intelligently designed, and the stop-gap measure of sickle cell trait is also intelligently designed, or at least according to ID.
He also discusses my favourite example of bad design, the mitochondrial genome. Mitochondria were originally symbiotic bacteria, and as such had a complete bacterial genome. Most of the mitochondrial genes have been moved out of harm's way to the nucleus, but the mitochondria still retains a circular bacterial chromosome, with a small number of genes, including 13 genes for components of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway. In mitochondria, exposed to free radicals of oxygen, they mutate at 5 to 10 times the rate of nuclear genes, so the end result is steadily decreasing energy production with ageing, and "brownouts" followed by "blackouts", and death.
The human genome contains 3 billion base pairs. Most of it is definitely "junk", without function. ID proponents have faith that all of it will eventually be found to have a function, but they are certain to be disappointed. Almost all genes consist of alternating exons (which code for the protein product) and introns (which don't). The trouble is, is that the the non-coding introns are 30 times as long as the coding exons. So the cell has to take a lot of effort transcribing a much larger mRNA molecule than necessary, and then has to expend a lot more effort splicing the non-coding RNA out to get a functional mRNA molecule. Not very efficient, and very wasteful. Bacteria have a much more efficient genome (actually, I wonder, does the Intelligent Designer love bacteria more than us?)
Towards the end, the author points out that Darwin liberated both science and theology with "Origin of the Species". No longer do religious people have to try to explain the theodicy of genetic defects, as the action of a loving and caring Creator.
The author finishes, with a re-writing of Darwin's famous conclusion to "Origin"; "... There is grandeur in this view of the genome, with its several powers, having perhaps been originally breathed by the Creator into one or a few primordial molecular forms; and ... from so simple a beginning most beautiful, sometimes most awful, but always wondrous genomic features have been, and are being evolved".
I think I still prefer the original, which still excites me whenever I hear it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Much-needed book; appreciated brevity; but very difficult for non-specialists., March 3, 2010
This review is from: Inside the Human Genome: A Case for Non-Intelligent Design (Hardcover)
Some material is irreducibly complex. I mean in genetics. There is only so far that an author can go in simplifying the material for a non-scientist like me before she ends up not even saying things that are accurate any more. So I sympathize with Avise's challenge in writing a book like this, but...I found some of his efforts to be more "popular" in his tone sort of amusing. I mean, he says that he is trying to produce a work for a "broad audience." Effort noted and appreciated, but then the next couple of chapters had between them perhaps four or five paragraphs that I could follow fully. And sometime's Avise helpfully provides a definition for a term that might not be familiar to the reader (ironically, it was more often than not these terms that I WAS familiar with...so perhaps one of his guiding principles was only to define the terms that were essential to an understanding of the overall subject matter even if in the context of other less-well-understood terms), followed by an onslaught of three or four paragraphs in a row of genetic arcana that I find it very hard to believe anyone without a solid grounding in genetics could follow.
Having said all that, I still think the book is valuable and I think it's compelling...even kind of fun in its way, because the genome and its workings are such a freak show. The chapters where Avise comes up for air and makes pronouncements on what we've just read are lucid and cogent. Avise plays painfully fair with theism, but I do wish he could have followed Jerry Coyne's example in "Why Evolution is True" and just not addressed much of the theistic stuff at all. It's not necessary to make some sort of atheistic rant or to try to make up some soothing excuses for theism either one. The science speaks for itself, quite loudly, and any dispassionate examination of the evidence can only lead one to conclude that an all-powerful, all-good being cannot be behind the human genome. As Avise says in the section on mitochondria, not only is the design of it suboptimal, it is ludicrous. 'Nuff said, frankly. Efforts at reconciliation with religion seem necessarily hollow once the truth of that sinks in.
There are other books that walk a similar path and are much easier to read. I'm thinking especially of
Survival of the Sickest: A Medical Maverick Discovers Why We Need Disease, which has an interesting take on, for example, malaria. But for sophisticated, scientifically credible material one could use to counter the work of, for example, some recent books that try to make the claim that Intelligent Design is evident in DNA, "Inside" is invaluable. Not light reading, mind you, but invaluable.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No