76 of 76 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Inside "Inside the Poker Mind," pros and cons, March 30, 2004
This review is from: Inside the Poker Mind: Essays on Hold 'em and General Poker Concepts (Paperback)
This book is more of a "Best Practices" poker book in many ways.
Here's the real skinny on the book and the reviews as I see it.
TRUE:
1. This book should not be the first poker book you read. But reviewers neglected to mention that the author himself states this in "General Poker Concepts" and suggests many starter texts.
2. This book does spend significant time on topics other than what's going on inside a poker player's mind. The author might do too much of that, but it's clear that he does so to provide supporting info. The sections contrasting the thoughts of average vs advanced players do treat the subject and perhaps they deserved more emphasis.
3. Yes, the author does criticize non-limit and tournament play. Playing in casino situations is very differnent from tournaments where the chips don't represent real money dollar for dollar. Nobody said it doesn't take skill to win. It's just a different skill set. Truth be told, there are plenty of great tournament books if that's what you are into.
FALSE:
1. No, it is not fair to say this book is unoriginal. Nor is it accurate that Sklansky's and Malmuth's books cover everything in this book. This book has some really great real world examples of poker logic spelled out much more clearly than in other books. It doesn't have to be the definitive poker book to be a valuable read.
2. While the book does start out a little slow, I found the stories very funny. For those who play in casino or card-room games, you will find humor in reading Feeney's examples of mistakes that you have seen yourself and others make. I did.
3. One point needs clarification before some unsuspecting person goes and drops $2K in Vegas after reading this book. Reading this book will NOT save you thousands of dollars. No book will save you $. Only UNDERSTANDING the concepts the book trys to bring across will actually make you or save you money.
On pg 62, he writes, "Education in poker theory reduces one's susceptibility to illusions which can interfere with good play." Man I wish I could believe this. I think his advice to seek psycotherapy might do more to that end.
So many people read a few books and lose their shirts because of false confidence. While I totally understand the value of the material, value cannot be derived by reading it. It must be digested, pondered, and mastered to be valuable.
The coolest thing about this book is the relevance of the examples. Every topic, from reraising the weak to calling on the end, was treated in a real world way that I have observed in casino play. A great example is "Maximizing the Set" on pgs 127-128. So many books treat these concepts abstractly. I must say that I did not fully understand much of this till I read this book.
Again, the outline of the way bad players think was the hallmark. It talks about things that not only stop you from making mistakes but help you identify the saps in a real game. Perhaps the treatment of tilt could have been more explicit. But his unique viewpoint provokes thought, even though it comes along with resistance.
There's a common quote that goes, "If you look around the poker table and don't see any suckers, you're it!" I would strongly advise anybody reading the sections on advanced vs. weak player thoughts to read the hands and honestly evaluate what they would be thinking if they drew that hand before reading the author's explaination. This is a serious wake-up call to those who are unknowing maniacs or overconfident goats.
Overall this is a very practical read that deserves the attention of anybody looking to increase their hourly rate in actual casino and card-room play.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
28 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Worthwhile, but not for the beginner, March 8, 2003
This review is from: Inside the Poker Mind: Essays on Hold 'em and General Poker Concepts (Paperback)
Overall Inside the Poker Mind should be part of any serious poker player's library. However, it shouldn't be one of the first books read about poker. Quite frankly, beginning players won't get much out of it, and most who have (that I know of) are dissappointed.
For the intermediate to advanced player, the subjects addressed should be extremely useful. For the most part, the book focuses, as the title implies, on different ways of thinking rather than strict tactical plays. Example: in the "strategic moment" section, the author contrasts what the average player thinks as opposed to what the advanced player considers. In this way the author illustrates the depths of poker.
Overall very worthwhile if you're ready for it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
23 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This Is the Book for Any Player Looking for Something Deeper, August 19, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: Inside the Poker Mind: Essays on Hold 'em and General Poker Concepts (Paperback)
Feeney has produced an extraordinarily deep work. The sections discussing the thought processes of an expert poker player are truly eye opening, and offer an insight into the complexities of the game that most books fail to capture. The book is exceptionally well-written -- exceptional in the sense that most great poker players are not great writers and most great poker books are, well, written by great poker players. (Slansky & Malmuth essentially open their "Texas Hold Em for Advanced Players" with an apology for their poor writing). This is not a book for beginning poker players, but I would recommend it without hesitation to anyone who has become familiar with basic poker theory. I had read about a dozen books on poker and hold 'em before I came to this one. No book before or since has made me feel so excited about the game.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No