Most Helpful Customer Reviews
13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Another excellent concept book from the sci-fi master, August 23, 1996
By A Customer
I don't think anyone who has read Niven would argue that he is the master of what I like to call the "concept" novel. He invents a fantastic concept, throroughly develops the idea, then writes a story around it. The shortcoming of the method is that characters, and in particular the flow of the stories from beginning to end is compromised. The Integral Trees is no exception to this rule, though characters are developed marginally better than in many Niven novels. The concept is based around a society of people descended from a single space ship which was stranded near a neutron star. The neutron star sustains a unique ecosystem in the "smoke ring" of breathable gasses in orbit around it. The integral trees are giant trees, shaped like the calculus symbol for an integral. The people inhabit the trees, and this is where the story begins. This novel is a very quick read, and as I mentioned, the concept is fabulous. I recommend it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent- moves in a new direction, July 24, 1997
By A Customer
Having read many Sci-Fi books in my life, I can honestly say that none can come close in originality and concept to the books 'Integral Trees' and the sequel, 'The Smoke Ring' by Larry Niven. You will instantly love this book where technology takes a second-hand place to the dynamics of human development and interactivity, and the remnants of human advancements exist as strange, unknown objects, myths, and faded social traditions. The book takes us into a free-fall environment, the remains of a gaseous planet orbiting a star in a binary system. Life has evolved there, free of the constrains of gravity. Ponds drift about as spheres of water, and multi-kilometer long trees are like small worlds containing lifeforms of numerous bizzare types. Humankind has reverted to tribal structures, the technology that brought them long forgotten. The old ways of Earth have all but dissapeared, existing only as ghosts in the speech patterns of the characters.
Niven has repeatedly written books that encourage us to think differently--to think big. If you liked the awesome strangeness of 'Ringworld,' then you will have an instant favorite in 'Integral Trees.'
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting World Building, August 30, 2003
First let me say that this edition I'm reviewing is a two for one. You get both the Integral Trees and The Smoke Ring in one volume, which certainly makes it worth the price. Secondly, The Smoke Ring was published four years after The Integral Trees. But reading The Smoke Ring, immediately after the Integral Trees, makes it a much more enjoyable and stronger book. I doubt I would have enjoyed it quite as much had I read it four years after reading The Integral Trees. Both of these novels are concept novels in the hard science fiction genre., which is both a strength and a weakness. Niven sets up the world he creates in The Integral Trees, and there is character development but it is a bit thin. I found the novel hard to slog through at times and frankly had a hard time conceptualizing the environment Niven creates. The Smoke Ring is a lot more fun on two accounts. First, Niven goes about exploring a lot more of the world he created. And the characters a bit more developed. Overall, both are worth reading. If you get through The Integral Trees and really liked it, I think you'd love The Smoke Ring. If you get through the Integral Trees and liked it, but just barely, The Smoke Ring is better. If you really hated The Integral Trees and didn't get it at all, skip The Smoke Ring.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|