If you were only to read what you already agreed with, you would not learn very much.
I don't understand how it can be assumed that that can advance society when we can agree that misogyny has been such a huge impediment.
In fact she never said that, here or elsewhere, and as such it would be wrong to attribute that belief to this or any other of her works.
Lots of info in this book, but very hard to read. It does help you understand women's roles in society and a historical look at feminism. Read morePublished 7 months ago by Josh
This is a good book. I like the questions and vantage points of view that Andrea Dworkin takes. I especially like her point of view on Joan of arc, it was eye opening to say the... Read morePublished 11 months ago by David Smith
In this book, Dworkin extends her analysis from pornography to sexual intercourse itself. She argues that in a male supremacist society the sexual subordination depicted in... Read morePublished on September 24, 2012 by Joyce
I understand that Dworkin had reason to fear and hate men. She was molested as a child. Her first husband abused her horribly. Read morePublished on December 11, 2011 by othoniaboys
I agree with all of the other five-star reviews I've read here, and don't want to reiterate what they've stated so well. Read morePublished on November 5, 2011 by T. Trask
In Ariel Levy's forward to my 2006 edition of this work, she says: "'Intercourse' is an inventive, combative, and wildly complicated piece of work, and to imagine that all there is... Read morePublished on January 12, 2011 by John P. Jones III
The time was the early nineties. I was in a small liberal arts college that was heavily steeped radical feminist thought. Read morePublished on August 22, 2009 by S. Schafer
Dworkin is a hero and she speaks the truth. Whether you like it or not its the truth and the truth hurts.Published on December 13, 2007 by Sara G. Harden
Dworkin presumes to tell straight women what their experience of sex is really like. But Dworkin never was a straight woman. Read morePublished on May 25, 2007 by John Stanhope