Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
How Law Works, and How Law Fails, February 9, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: In the Interests of Justice: Reforming the Legal Profession (Hardcover)
In this penetrating new book, Deborah L. Rhode goes beyond the commonplace attacks on lawyers to provide the first systematic study of the structural problems confronting the legal profession. A past president of the Association of American Law Schools and senior counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during Clinton's impeachment proceedings, Rhode brings an insider's knowledge to the labyrinthine complexities of how the law works, or fails to work, for most Americans and often for lawyers themselves. She sheds much light on problems with the adversary system, the commercialization of practice, bar disciplinary processes, race and gender bias, and legal education. She argues convincingly that the bar's current self-regulation must be replaced by oversight structures that would put the public's interests above those of the profession. She insists that legal education become more flexible, by offering less expensive degree programs that would prepare paralegals to provide much needed low cost assistance. Most important, she calls for a return to ethical standards that put public service above economic self-interest. Elegantly written and touching on such high profile cases as the O.J. Simpson trial and the Starr investigation, In the Interests of Justice uncovers fundamental flaws in our legal system and proposes sweeping reforms. "A thoughtful and well-documented analysis, from a broad public perspective, of basic and enduring problems of the American legal profession. In The Interests Of Justice presents the insights of a distinguished scholar into legal ethics, the cost of legal services, the delays in the legal system, the role of the law schools, and 'life' in contemporary law practice."--Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., Trustee Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania "This is an important and timely book. It provides a comprehensive survey of the common complaints against lawyers and the legal system; a careful analysis of the most serious problems with the way lawyers perform their jobs, and make--or fail to make--available their services, and an imposing array of ambitious but workable proposals for reform. The book expertly builds upon the best that has been thought and said about legal ethics and legal practices in the last 25 years."--Robert W. Gordon, Fred A. Johnston Professor of Law, Yale University
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
DISCOVERING THE FLAWS IN LEGAL PRACTICE, December 15, 2003
A very interesting diagnostic of the major flaws in the U.S. legal system, by Deborah L. Rhode, Professor of Law at Stanford Law School. Well written, this book unveils many of the fundamental reasons for the perception that the public at large has of the lawyers and their trade..... The chapters titled Lawyers and their discontent, The advocate's role in the adversary system, and the Regulation of the profession, are truly revealing vis a vis the current problems that plague legal practice. Professor's Rhode suggestions as to possible solutions towards a betterment of the workings of the legal system are thought provoking. The funny thing about this book, is that you can extrapolate many of the revelations about the rocky road of legal education and the structural problems that now affect legal firms in the U.S., to other legal systems, outside the common law area..... So, even as a mirror of the flaws and shared problems that affect the legal profession in other countries, such as the commercialization of practice and the underestimation of ethical standards in favor of lawyer's economic self interest, this book is recommended reading.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Lawyers' money vs. the public's legal system, March 5, 2001
This review is from: In the Interests of Justice: Reforming the Legal Profession (Hardcover)
Rhode's sbook is billed as a systematic study of the sturctural problems confronting the legal lprofession, and it delivers on that theme. It concentrates on identifying real problems associated with the practice of law in America, and avoids many of the contentious areas that scholars love to write about. There is no lamenting about the glories of the classical period; there is no invocation of the nostrum of simply returning to more prudence and restraint in the practice of law. She doesn't blame the legal realists or any other group for leading us into our present condition. Nor does she overstate the influence of the law on our society, and indeed suggests that law is more the effect than a cause of our social tensions. All of these matters are of great interest, and not without importance. But her focus in in examining modern legal practice as it actually and directly impacts the legal system, and in drawing up a balance sheet of its assets and liabilities. In short, she sticks to her guns and explores the opportunity that we lawyers have to make a better contribution to our commonweal by recognizing and changing some of the flaws in our practice. The primary thesis of the book is that the profession is not sufficiently accountable to the publc, for whom-presumably-it acts. She explores in some detail the relative ineffectuality of our bar organizations and our courts to provide a desired degree of regulation over lawyers. While she acknowldeges that no one wants the heavy hand of government to control our lawyers, she repeatedly points out how and why our self-regulation is more self-serving than regulating. Disciplinary groups lack the resources and commitment to investigate most complaints. Judges are loathe to sanction fellow attorneys, and consider that handling complaints about discovery abuses and other unethical acts don't do anything to advance resolution of cases. And attempts to toughen the Model Rules and other controlling regulations have been largely repelled in favor of promoting the creed of zealous advocacy. Rhode tackles the excesses of the adversary system, pointing out that it does not always promote truth finding, and in many cases deters access of deserving clients to the resources of our legal system. A review of Rhode's book in the Feb. '01 isssue of the ABA Journal is critical for understating lawyers' drive for money as the key operative problem, and suggests that desired reforms will not materialize unless we are presented with some kind of really significant crisis. And certainly, as you read through her suggested reforms, balanced as they are, the easiest reaction is that lawyer greed will not permit such changes. But surely she is correct to lay out the problems, and at least we lawyers should read the record. If we are half the problem solvers that we say we are, we should want to act before a crisis is upon us. And she is prbably right in saying that if we can improve our accountability to the public, we will concurrently improve our own professional lot.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
