This book is part history and part advocacy. The historical part of the book is itself twofold: a discussion of the original intent of the Founders to prevent the spirit of faction, or party, from taking control of the government and a recitation of events culminating in the failed effort of the U.S. Defense Department to institute a system of remote Internet voting for its overseas personnel.
The advocacy part features the author's proposal for a series of televised debates and Internet-based voting that would produce what he feels is a better outcome in electing a president, one that would counteract the influence of the Citizens United decision allowing for unlimited corporate spending on behalf of presidential candidates.
So the book is paradoxical, calling for a return to an older set of values and, at the same time, for employing the latest in electronic technology to the most basic of political acts, voting.
At first glance, the proposal for a series of state, regional, and national debates to be followed by Internet voting to winnow the field seems a bit impractical and doesn't take into account the many obstacles to its implementation. On closer examination, however, one can see that this proposal seems to have already been used in practice, in the countless Republican primary debates, followed by detailed polling of potential voters. In an odd way, the author's proposal seems to already have been put in place, albeit with pollsters collecting feedback on the candidates, rather than an Internet voting system that collects and aggregates the preferences of actual online voters.
The subtitle of the book refers to eliminating the influence of the Citizens United decision on presidential elections, which the author believes could be done by instituting the debate-and-Internet-voting system he recommends. By highlighting this relationship in the title, the author has rightly called attention to a phenomenon that has, in fact, played a significant role so far in the 2012 election, decimating Newt Gingrich's support in Iowa and then, giving him an impetus himself in South Carolina. The author is to be commended for calling attention to the centrality of Citizens United in the electoral process going forward, and for his clarity and passion in advocating a return to fundamental American values that he wants implemented using the latest technological advances, in the form of remote Internet voting.