Interpreting the French Revolution [Paperback]

François Furet (Author), Elborg Forster (Translator)

Book Description

Publication Date: October 30, 1981 | ISBN-10: 0521280494 | ISBN-13: 978-0521280495

The French Revolution is an historical event unlike any other. It is more than just a topic of intellectual interest: it has become part of a moral and political heritage. But after two centuries, this central event in French history has usually been thought of in much the same terms as it was by its contemporaries. There have been many accounts of the French Revolution, and though their opinions differ, they have often been commemorative or anniversary interpretations of the original event. The dividing line of revolutionary historiography, in intellectual terms, is therefore not between the right and the left, but between commemorative and conceptual history, as exemplified respectively in the works of Michelet and Tocquevifle. In this book, François Furet analyses how an event like the French Revolution can be conceptualised, and identifies the radically new changes the Revolution produced as well as the continuity it provided, albeit under the appearance of change. This question has become a riddle for the European left, answered neither by Marx nor by the theorists of our own century. In his analysis of the tragic relevance of the Revolution, Furet both refers to contemporary experience and discusses various elements in the work of Alexis de Tocclueville and that of Augustin Cochin, which has never been systematically applied by historians of the Revolution. Furet's book is based on the complementary ideas of these two writers in an attempt to cut through the apparent and misleading clarity of various contradictory views of the Revolution, and to help decipher some of the enigmatic problems of revolutionary ideology. It will be of value to historians of modern Europe and their students; to political, social and economic historians; to sociologists; and to students of political thought.

Editorial Reviews

Review

' ... a milestone in the historiography of the French Revolution.' William Doyle, History Today

Language Notes

Text: English, French (translation) --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Product Details

• Paperback: 216 pages
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press (October 30, 1981)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0521280494
• ISBN-13: 978-0521280495
• Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 6.1 x 0.6 inches
• Shipping Weight: 12 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 2.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #426,647 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

22 of 25 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars More Contemporary Political Soap Box Than History, January 13, 2005

By 

Gregory Canellis "Student of military history... (Tuckerton, NJ USA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Interpreting the French Revolution (Paperback)

Francois Furet delves deep beneath the surface of events that shaped the French Revolution as an historical event, to convey what he believes is a need for a conceptual analysis that refutes the "dominant" Marxist interpretations of the 1970's. Furet, who hails from the so called third generation of Annales School historians, was one of a few daring French scholars that attempted to bring political history back into a paradigm that was dominated by social, economic, and qualitative history in the post-World War II decades. Admitting that before any scholarship on the French Revolution can be taken seriously, an historian must first " show his colors,"...i.e....declare his political stand. Endorsing the earlier works of Alexis de Tocqueville and Augustin Cochin, Furet points to the substantial Socialist element that has existed in his homeland, and argues: the one trait that was unique to the French Revolution, was the fact that it was the first experiment with democracy. The result is a valiant political stand but a puzzling historical analysis.The book consists of four essays written at various times from 1971 to 1978. In "The Revolution is Over", Furet counters the Marxist argument that the French Revolution was the model for future Communists political uprisings, or liberations, specifically, the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. Furet admits there were similarities between Joseph Stalin and Robespierre, Stalin's purges and the Terror, and Napoleon Bonaparte and Leon Trotsky, however, he emphasizes that the "Revolutionary Break" which separated the old from the contemporary French histories, ended at 9 Thermidor with absolute power coming full circle, this time, in the hands of society. In the process, Furet attempts to get to the root of such concepts as: "revolutionary ideology," and it relationship to "plot," and how the opinions of individuals transformed the "conscious will" of French society into conscious acts. In the second part of the book, Furet critiques the standard cause and effect history of Tocqueville and the "traditionalist" political history of the French Revolution as penned by Cochin. These historiographical essays are perhaps the strongest part of the book, and most beneficial to serious students of this era, yet overall, the book can be confusing to readers who are not extremely well versed in the history of the French Revolution. Furet's fragmented literary style (Undoubtedly, much has been lost in translation), and the absence of an index; makes the book exceedingly hard to follow. The author makes a number of interesting points, however, his contentions are scattered and do not flow evenly. Furet admits that the second part of the book was written first and perhaps would have made for an easier read had it been published in that order. Furet gears his analysis to an audience who is highly versed in this topic. Overall, the book utilizes an historical event to make a contemporary political stand against Marxism by a contemporary French historian. Not recommended for the beginner.

5 of 23 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Interesting fiction, poor history, December 5, 2006

By 

Raoul Zimmerman "Postrevisionista" (Suburbia, CA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Interpreting the French Revolution (Paperback)

Easily the most effective full-frontal attack (agains the then-ruling Marxists) in the long and voluminous historiography of the French Revolution, Francois Furet pulled its scholarly field -- almost in toto -- away from silly things like studying actual people. Instead, Furet chose to focus on a narrow strain of language largely embodied in the writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, which he believes came of age in 1789 and suicidally pushed the Revolution to the peak of the Terror in 1794.

A rightist attempt at highjacking the legacy of the first modern social revolution, Furet's writings have come under sustained attack in recent years by scholars who have shown the much wider discursive environment (and even much wider than that lived experience) of the Revolutionary era.

Nearly thirty years after its publication, Furet's piece is its own historical artifact, which can be an amusing read as such, but read as well the many more recent scholars who don't find it to be the end of the line...