Richard Appignanesi goes in personal quest of Existentialism in its original state. He begins with Camus' question of suicide: 'Must life have a meaning to be lived?' Is absurdity at the heart of Existentialism? Or is Sartre right: is Existentialism 'the least scandalous, most technically austere' of all teachings?
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not an Introduction,
This review is from: Introducing Existentialism (Paperback)
I recently became a big fan of the Introducing series, but I'll have to say that this book is both frustrating and disappointing. I do not know much about Existentialism (hence why I bought the book) but I can point to what appear to be some problems with the book with what little I know. For example, the book spends a lot of time concentrating on Husserl, who is arguably not an existentialist philosopher. One of Sartre's central concept of "bad faith" in mentioned only once on page 19 and is not really explained. The famous "Existence precedes essence" quote of Sartre is nowhere to be found. There are probably other major concepts that are missing or not clearly explained, but again, I don't know enough (perhaps even less!) about the subject after reading this book.
Another criticism is the style. Most of the Introducing books tend to go in chronological order or in some logical order showing the development of a particular subject. This book is framed more as the author's own journey into solving particular puzzles that are supposedly connected to existentialism, but it in no way elucidates the subject. It jumps from subject to subject, few of which appear to deal with Existentialism in any way (or in any way that is clearly explained). The writing style tends to be a little thick and phrased in such a way to make the meaning more obscure (e.g. "Heidegger rightly means that the 'crisis' of science is not its own but ours by unmindfulness of how science came entirely to occupy our horizon of 'being in the world'." p. 59). It reads like someone trying to make a simple concept sound more profound by superfluous wording and meaningless analogies. It's like the really pretentious guy at the cocktail party who tells stories about himself and make everything that happens in his daily life sound like an epic of spiritual fulfillment. In short, this is not an introduction. Without knowing any better, it appears to be the author's attempt to explore what are probably no more than footnotes of Existentialist philosophy and perhaps some of his own interpretations of what other philosophers saw or meant. I did not buy this book to read someone else's dissertation on some marginal concepts. I want to be spoon-fed the basic concepts as conceived by the principal philosophers of the subject. The Introducing Philosophy and even Wikipedia provide a much better overview of the subject in a few pages than this book.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Overwhelmed,
By Jay Ardia "Jayardia" (Thunder Bay, Canada) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Introducing Existentialism (Paperback)
In hoping for a canoe, I received a battleship; (with no boarding ramp OR ladder). As a non-academic, I found this rather murky reading. It could be that the series title: 'Introducing' did not actually intend the material to be "introductory", but I certainly took it as such. Thus the lower rating; (2 1/2), if I were able.
The general character of the book, especially in the art style, (I felt), focused so very much on and of 'despair', that I couldn't help but think that, despite (likely) being MILES ahead of myself at the level of intellect and analysis, I daresay the author himself, (Richard Appignanesi) may have missed the 'point' of existentialist thought, which (I) take to be: * " 'Who we are' is based on the choices we make; that 'who we are' is 'up to US'; overcoming ourselves." * Again, perhaps too basic for his seemingly (to me), hyper-complex palate. Having said that, I did not come away from the book without gleaning some "knowledge", and despite the aforementioned "murkiness", I DID find it quite interesting; more however as a personal existentialist journey than an introduction to the concepts of existentialism. Perhaps I'll return to it at a later date... when I "feel smarter".
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Not an Introduction,
By
This review is from: Introducing Existentialism (Paperback)
I'm sure this is a very insightful essay about a very arcane topic in Existentialism. However it utterly fails as a primer for the whole philosophy. Only seasoned PhD's will get anything out of this book.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
