Most Helpful Customer Reviews
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
An irritating book., September 4, 2004
The strongest point of the book is the exercises. They force you to reread and understand the proofs and they build a foundation for material that is to come.
Chapter 1 (2nd edition) need a complete rewrite. How can you obfuscate something as simple as the Archimedean property in all its forms? Chapter 8 on Euclidean spaces needs to be better integrated with what the student should know from the first linear algebra course.
The author's proofs are not clear and I found myself rewriting many of them in my own words or turning to other references.
The core chapters 2-7 and 11-13 are fine - especially if you buy the approach of doing analysis first in R and then doing it a second time in R^n. This may be especially appropriate in an environment where most of the students are future high school teachers and will only take 1 advanced calculus course.
There are an unusual number of typos in the second edition. They are no longer accessible on the author's website. But hey, the 3rd edition is available, just throw out the 2nd and get the latest.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
+ve multidimensional analysis -ve atrocious binding, 1-dimensional analysis could've been more detailed, October 18, 2005
This review is from: Introduction to Analysis (2nd Edition) (Hardcover)
This book was used in my Analysis I class. I later had to prepare again for my masters certifying exam on Analysis and the primary reason I didn't use this book, even though I owned it, was the binding. By the end of my analysis course, it was practically in individual pages. The binding is atrocious - how can a $100+ book just be sort of glued together weakly that it falls apart after 1 semester of use.
The other reason I didn't use this book was that it goes through the 1-dimensional analysis pretty fast. My chosen analysis preparation book was also supposed to be my preparation for Royden's Real Analysis but I choose a book that covers the 1-dimensional analysis in twice the amount of pages and exercises taking a more detailed topology route. So, I'd advise a little bit of caution there if this is your path to graduate level Real Analysis.
However, with the 3rd edition out, our department threw out all the old 2nd edition books. I needed a multi-dimensional analysis text to prepare for my graduate PDE course and took 3 copies of the thrown ones out.
The reason I took 3 copies was that I knew the binding was going to fall apart and sure enough it did. It sort of breaks down into little booklets each that is glued to the spine. The pages on booklet peel off real easy and soon you have just pages instead of a book.
As for the multidimensional analysis it covers, it was very entertaining and fun to do. Chapter 13 becomes a little bit in the air as the exercises get a little tedious with calculate this integral with all sorts of surfaces enclosing it and not really much exercises requring a lot of threading of analysis ideas. I don't as of yet know if it has me prepared enough for Evan's PDE book but this was the only text conviniently showed up in the "free books" bin. But, I did have a nice linear and fun writing to it and I enjoyed it. Though not much as some of my other books.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Better books probably exist on the topic, December 21, 2010
There HAS to be better texts out there in analysis. This book obscures simple concepts and neglects vital information for an introduction to analysis. I have suffered through this book, working VERY hard for three semesters. Nevertheless there are still concepts that I don't TRULY understand, which is largely attributable Wade's poor exposition of the topic. For example, the entire treatment of differentiability in Euclidean n-space, including the manner in which Wade introduces the definition, is pathetically motivated/explained. This makes it difficult to understand and convince yourself of other proofs/concepts which rely on a firm understanding of the previously studied material.
For a truly comprehensive introduction, I'd suggest Introduction to Analysis by Maxwell Rosenlicht. I bought this as a supplementary text to the courses I have taken, largely due to positive reviews, and was very pleased. I gained significant insight due to the presence of discussions spanning more than three sentences between each lemma, theorem, corollary, or remark, in complete contrast to Wade's book. Another plus is that it's around 10% of the cost.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|