| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
24 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
target audience not defined,
By
This review is from: Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance (Hardcover)
I find the book rather poorly written in the aspect of providing links between statistical physics and its application in economics. As a physicist with a background in stochastic processes, I was looking for an introduction to their applications to economic analysis, complete with examples and discussion of the methods' limitations. The book was somewhat disappointing in this respect. Quite often, in many chapters, the necessary math is explained, then some aspects of how it is manefest in economical data are presented and then the chapter ends, leaving the reader wonder what the specific cases may be and if it is practical to use those methods at all. Above all, there is very little discussion as to what the results actually mean, in economical terms. I believe the book may be helpful for reseachers active in this field but I would not recommend it as a first introduction to econophysics. For economists, the math may be rather difficult to go through as some of the fundamental concepts are not defined consistently. For physicists with no previous exposure to econophysics, I would prefer to see more economics.
23 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
First in the new field,
By Professor Joseph L. McCauley "Joseph L. McCauley" (Austria+Texas) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance (Hardcover)
I found several parts of this book useful while preparing lectures for an introductory econophysics course in Fall, 2001. The discussions of convolutions of distributions, Levy distributions and scaling are well-written and easy to follow. In the brief discussion of the St. Petersburg Paradox I missed a critical discussion of expected utility, which was invented by Bernoullli to 'resolve' that paradox. Spurred by von Neumann and Morgenstern, neo-classical economics relies on the idea of expected utility, which seems empirically to be wrong. The chapter on time correlations is also very readable (although Wiener processes are not 1/f^2 noise!). ARCH and GARCH methods are discussed, saving the student from the pain of reading badly-written papers by mathematically-minded economists, but the chapters on options are too brief with nothing new. The best introduction to options is still the original Black-Scholes paper (excepting their erroneous claim that CAPM and the delta-hedge strategy produce option pricing pdes that agree with each other). Also, it would have been nice to have seen a discussion of CAPM. The discussion of algorithmic complexity left me cold (see my earlier books and papers on nonlinear dynamics), and I would like to have seen a critical discussion of the EMH. These criticisms are ok, though, the gaps leave something for the rest of us to work on.
35 of 48 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
The second and better book on the topic and....,
By A Customer
This review is from: Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance (Hardcover)
let us not forget it on the MARKET. Contrary to what has been suggested in a review on the econophysics forum, I find this book superior to its competitor by Bouchaud and Potters soon to appear in english at CUP. It is more concise, which is not necessarily an advantage, but in the light of what is available it certainly is one. I am mostly talking about the stuff on pdfs and the market models. What econophysicists have to say about actual financial instruments apart from the fact that they criticize the underlying probabilities used I can still not see, but well is physics not full of rediscoveries, so why not export these embarrassingly (and with arrogance please) outside of physics?One last point concerns the style in which this and Bouchaud's book are written. I believe that econophysicists have yet to find the proper language in which to talk. Thus, most literature is written in a setting most appealing for statistical physicists, as it strongly hinges on that subject's background and contemporary culture. There are obvious reasons for this, but altogether this needs to be obliterated. Only then econophysics grow into a mature self-consistent branch of the natural sciences. This book is far from attaining such a goal and the comprehensive treatise on physics and economics remains to be written. It is unlikely that this will happen tomorrow given the immaturity of the scene, the actors and the play. Altogether a book worth the read.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|