Introduction to Metamathematics (Bibliotheca Mathematica) 1st Edition

9 customer reviews
ISBN-13: 978-0720421033
ISBN-10: 0720421039
Why is ISBN important?
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Sell yours for a Gift Card
We'll buy it for $4.35
Learn More
Trade in now
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Buy used
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Book is great condition. Crisp and clean. No markings inside.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
24 Used from $21.79
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover, January 15, 1980
"Please retry"
$97.00 $21.79
Unknown Binding
"Please retry"
More Buying Choices
22 New from $97.00 24 Used from $21.79 1 Collectible from $79.45

InterDesign Brand Store Awareness Rent Textbooks

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: Bibliotheca Mathematica
  • Hardcover: 560 pages
  • Publisher: North Holland; 1 edition (January 15, 1980)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0720421039
  • ISBN-13: 978-0720421033
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 1.2 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #745,539 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Important Information

Example Ingredients

Example Directions

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

69 of 70 people found the following review helpful By Guilherme on July 14, 2004
Format: Hardcover
This is one of those books that don't get old; although it was first published in 1952, and since then much has been made in Mathematical Logic, Kleene's book has that rare position of a book that influenced the subject on its own (and all the teaching books that came after). And if you are willing to understand Mathematical Logic, and principally the reasons behind most of the definitions, I think that this is the best book to start. As a reference it is perhaps the most cited book in the area. But the reading is pleasant, elegant and well motivated. This book has another kind of appeal, in my opinion - research in Logic split after the 1950's in two distinct areas: one, more mathematical in character, is called Model Theory and is strongly abstract, working mainly with the semantics; another, more philosophical and applied, deals mainly with the sintax - this last is the line of research of non-classical logics (philosophically interesting) and of automated procedures, like Smullyan's semantic tableaux for proof-theory (very useful for computation theory). Today the interconnections on these areas, that were initially very close, are dangerously disappearing. Kleene's book, having been written before this separation, is much more comprehensive than the modern textbooks. About the contents: it begins with a (very well) introduction explaining the meaning of Metamathematics. Then it treats Propositional, Predicate Calculi and Formal Number Theory, written in the classical spirit that unfortunately lacks today. The third part deals with recursive functions, and the author was a first-hand researcher in the field, with many important contributions. Finally, the last part treats Model Theory as it was known then (this section can be considered pretty incomplete today).
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
36 of 36 people found the following review helpful By Achronymous on November 3, 2009
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Kleene's textbook is one of the fundamental texts of mathematical logic. It is easy to see why it is (supposedly) the most cited book in the mathematical logic literature. It is a model of clear explanation, and it does a better job of motivating the subject than any other textbook I have read (I mean deep intellectual and historical motivation of the subject, not the kind of motivation found in introductory logic books about what deduction is, and why learning logic is a good thing to do). Ishi press are to be thanked for making it readily available again at a low price. This edition however is a little on the cheaply made side; this edition was scanned from an older edition, and there are faint copy lines on most pages, so it looks like a photocopy. The pages are glued to the spine, and the binding is not flexible and does not appear all that durable. This means this edition is probably not ideal for serious study as the book will not lay out flat, and forcing it to do so may crack the spine. Nevertheless, if you are interested in mathematical logic this is a must read, and this edition makes it much easier to do so.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful By AssemblyTimeConstant on September 2, 2012
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
The other reviewers have lauded the book enough that any more praise may seem embarrassing to everyone involved; but more praise it deserves. It integrates some philosophy (intuitionism, formalism, and logicism) more than most modern texts, and is very thorough in its coverage. The annotated bibliography is useful, though the new introductory material added to the Isha edition seems insubstantial (e.g., the introduction cites the wikipedia article on Kleene as a source).

Some criticism it surely deserves: the lack of model theory reveals the book's age (though the reviewer Guilherme thinks this alternative perspective to be a strength). Paul E. Mokrzecki's review rather eccentrically pans the text for using the truth-functional definition of implication (we're all familiar with it: false only when the antecendent is true and the consequent false). Achronymous faults the text for its construction, but so far my copy has beautifully suffered my abuse. Sure, there are a few copy lines, but before this edition I would have had to shell out about two hundred dollars for a copy! I was heartbroken.

And another miracle has occurred: though Chang and Keisler's Model Theory may be a bit dated too (Hodges or Marker are newer, we know we know...), the Dover Publications reprint means that an affordable model theory text can accompany Kleene. The availability of cheap model theory texts makes Kleene's lack of inclusion of this subject far from disastrous.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful By André Gargoura on November 7, 2012
Format: Paperback
I would not add much by saying that "Introduction to MetaMathematics" (IM) remains a masterpiece, even though the style is a bit oldish...

On the the other hand, "Mathematical Logic" (ML) brings a definite plus, but is by no means a replacement, rather a necessary complement.

As I planned to study both, the problem posed was the order in which one should approach those books : Historically ? By increasing or decreasing difficulty ? In parallel, in order to see how Kleene's ideas -- and the field -- have evolved between 1952 and 1966, and subject by subject ?

I chose the third an most difficult path... And the journey was a thrill !

Here is how I planned this strange exploration : IM, ch. 1 to 7 ; ML, ch. 1 to 4 ; IM, ch. 8 ; IM, Part III ; ML, ch. 5 : IM, ch. 14 ; ML, ch. 6 ; IM, ch. 15.

ML is certainly less difficult but contains a fair amount of footnotes linking it to IM, i.e. studying IM is simply inevitable and enjoyable, even though some parts are really tough and must be "examined in a cursory manner", as suggested by Kleene, e.g. ch. 14 & 15.

IM, part III, is a thorough treatment of recursive functions, the best in my opinion and is not part of ML.

All in all, the two together rank very high in logic books, perhaps highest.

This book now stands in my personal list of key books of Logic, as follows :

1. A. Tarski's "Introduction to Logic", a jewel, followed by P. Smith's superb entry-point "An introduction to Formal logic" and the lovely "Logic, a very short introduction" by Graham Priest

2. D. Goldrei's "Propositional and Predicate calculus"

3. Wilfrid Hodges' "Logic", followed by Smullyan's "First-order logic".

4. P.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Want to discover more products? Check out this page to see more: mathematical analysis