Qty:1
  • List Price: $65.00
  • Save: $5.91 (9%)
Usually ships within 1 to 3 weeks.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Introduction to the Philo... has been added to your Cart
+ $3.99 shipping
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by book_holders
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: [ No Hassle 30 Day Returns + Ships Daily ] [ Underlining/Highlighting:NONE ] [ Writing:SOME ] [ Edition: First ]
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Trade in your item
Get a $1.11
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Introduction to the Philosophy of Science Library Binding – March 1, 1999

ISBN-13: 978-0872204515 ISBN-10: 0872204510 Edition: 1st

Buy New
Price: $59.09
18 New from $59.09 5 Used from $25.85
Amazon Price New from Used from
Library Binding
"Please retry"
$59.09
$59.09 $25.85
Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student

$59.09 FREE Shipping. Usually ships within 1 to 3 weeks. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Year
Best Books of 2014
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2014's Best Books of the Year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.

Product Details

  • Library Binding: 464 pages
  • Publisher: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.; 1 edition (March 1, 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0872204510
  • ISBN-13: 978-0872204515
  • Product Dimensions: 1.2 x 6 x 9.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #6,408,545 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

The overall standard of the volume is extraordinarily high, and I have no doubt that this will be the text in philosophy of science for a couple of decades. The coverage is remarkable both in breadth and depth. . . . an amazingly good book. . . . written by an all-star team. . . . --Philip Kitcher, Columbia University

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
0
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

6 of 38 people found the following review helpful By Viktor Blasjo on January 8, 2009
Format: Paperback
This is a dogmatic and petty introduction to the philosophy of science, featuring the following trademark traits of second-rate analytic philosophy:

Mathematical incompetence. It is claimed that it follows from Bayes' theorem P(H|E)=P(H)P(E|H)/P(E) that "since the expectedness [of the evidence] occurs in the denominator of the fraction, the smaller the expectedness, the greater the value of the fraction. Surprising evidence confirms hypotheses more than evidence to be expected regardless of the hypothesis." (p. 73). This is stupid. One cannot argue in this way since the evidence occurs also in the numerator. If we change the denominator we change the numerator as well, so we cannot tell whether the fraction will become greater or smaller.

Uncritical treatment of pet theories. E.g. Bayesianism, regarding which it is claimed, for example, that priors wash out (p. 84) and that "Humean sceptics who regiment their beliefs according to the axioms of probability cannot remain sceptical about [a] universal generalization in the face of ever-increasing positive instances (and no negative instances) unless they assign [to it] a zero prior" (p. 94). The mathematical theorems that are supposed to support these hubristic claims actually say something infinitely weaker. In fact, since these theorems are limit theorems they say absolutely nothing at all about any actual situation whatsoever. Such rather obvious objections are ignored in the interest of propaganda.

Authoritarian decrees. We are told that Lakatos' rational reconstructions approach "has rightly been rejected by historians" (p. 154). Why "rightly"? There is not a trace of an argument or any evidence for this.

Convoluted style. E.g.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?