Most Helpful Customer Reviews
20 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
a great introduction to the philosophy of science, November 28, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (Paperback)
This is perhaps the only book in which Carnap is almost invariably informal. It is a remarkably clear introduction to some important topics in the philosophy of science: the nature of scientific laws, probability, scientific measurement, the structure of space, causality and determinism, theoretical concepts and laws, and a last chapter called "beyond determinism". The point where Carnap gets a bit formal, sections 26-28, is boring and absolutely out of date; his approach to analyticity is certainly not the best available. As for the rest, Carnap's conceptions are generally reliable (although it should be observed that his "logical conception" programme for probability was a complete failure). The sections I enjoyed most are those which deal with the structure of space. Carnap is highly proficient there (Carnap's doctoral dissertation was called "Der Raum") and his philosophical observations are always lucid and precise.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
21 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A unique product of a unique collaberation, July 6, 2004
This review is from: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (Paperback)
Is this book still relevant, despite being a bit old? The answer is an unqualified YES. Why is this book the best introduction to the philosophy of science ever written? Because it is the result of a collaberation between Rudolf Carnap (a philosophical giant) and Martin Gardner--the celebrated columnest who gave us so many years of "Mathematical games," during Scientific American's golden years. Because it was co-written by a professional writer of popular mathematics, it is probably the only philosophy of science book which can be read and understood by the interested lay person. But because it is based on a series of lecture notes from one of the worlds all-time great philosophers of science, it doesn't "wimp out" on the technical level. If you read it you will be brought to the forefront of philosophy of science, at least as understood by the later logical positivists. In short, a remarkable collaberation by two men who were at the top of their game. Thank God for Dover. For ten bucks you can buy a priceless book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
excellent read on why Science works the way it does, September 16, 1997
By A Customer
This review is from: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (Paperback)
This is probably the clearest account of the way Science works and why certain decisions are made. Within it is contained the clearest explanation of portions of General Relativity (as a concrete example of why Einstein presented the theory in the manner he did) I've ever read, as well as many other little interesting tidbits. Some parts of the book are a bit dry, but that is probably because this book is a rewriting of college lecture notes given by the author.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|