I do not especially care for most romance novels but I do love historical fiction and
The Invisible Bridge appealed to me as a Jewish love story set against the backdrop of Hungary and France during World War II. As a first novel for Julie Orringer,
The Invisible Bridge is indeed an impressive achievement in the research and presentation of established historic events. I am not Jewish so I have a great appreciation for any knowledge of Jewish history, particularly of the Holocaust and World War II, that I might learn through literature.
The Invisible Bridge proved to be no exception. It is reminiscent of some of great works of historical literature that I have the highest respect for, including
Fatelessness by Imre Kertesz,
Night (Oprah's Book Club) by Elie Wiesel,
Mila 18 by Leon Uris,
The Pianist: The Extraordinary True Story of One Man's Survival in Warsaw, 1939-1945 by Wladyslaw Szpilman, and
Suite Francaise by Irene Nemirovsky to name a few. I might not put Ms. Orringer's first novel up againt any of those as a literary achievement but I think
The Invisible Bridge really demonstrates knowledge, skill and accomplishment. In fact I think this novel leans more toward the tradition of James Michener, another writer of historic fiction who I still admire to this day.
The novel is indeed well crafted and the language poetic. I must admit though that I cared least for the first 200 pages of this 600 page novel. In the opening chapters where the plot is meticulously developed and the characters fleshed out, I almost had to give up on the book entirely, wondering if I really wanted to invest any more time in what I thought was an overly long, overly sentimental, "Harlequin-style" romance.
First of all, the many, many unbelievable coincidences upon which the story is built completely blocked my willing suspension of disbelief and annoyed me greatly. Secondly, the main character, Andras Levi, is just too good a hero to be true. He is without a flaw ~ handsome, intelligent, talented, charming, devoted, honest, exceptional in every way. He's a good Jewish son, a devoted lover, a dedicated friend, an excellent student, the perfect employee, a great patriot. Likewise, his mysterious beautiful heroine is also dramatic perfection. Furthermore I thought too much of the dialogue was unnatural and rigid, lacking nuance and personality.
Since I can never put down a book unfinished that I intend to review, I persisted on, reading with a skeptical eye rather than a sympathetic one. Interestingly enough, by Part Four I realized that I had entirely forgiven the book its earlier weaknesses and had completely thrown myself under the spell of Ms. Orringer's powerful storytelling. I was riveted; I could not put it down.
The historic presentation of the book is as forceful and gripping as it is chilling and haunting. Ms. Orringer's ability to translate into words the shattering horror of the Jewish experience of the Holocaust and World War II is masterful storytelling of wrenching emotional intensity. The story is familiar, telling of the subjection of the Jews ~ the subjection of human beings to the social forces which have stripped away everything from them and are "made nonsensical, made small, consigned to impossibility, crammed into a space too narrow to admit life. But today as he'd marched to work and shoveled dirt and eaten the miserable food and slogged home through the mud, he hadn't felt indignant, he hardly felt anything at all. He was just an animal on earth, one of billions." Yet Andras learns to survive. He survives by remembering the great love in his life and by pretending, by fooling himself into staying alive; making himself "a willing party to the insidious trick of love."
The strength of Ms. Orringer's novel is the tender and poignant testimony of the human spirit, the fragile structure of a human being standing against the barbaric forces of history. It is a touching story of the power of love, the foundation of life which withstands the horror and tragedy, grief and despair of war.
It is just a pity that her focus is on romantic maudlinism and contrived, ridiculous plotting in the first part of the book. I can't quite get beyond those weaknesses and therefore rate it 3 stars rather than more.