Most Helpful Customer Reviews
72 of 74 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A flawed masterpiece, March 3, 2000
Mr Davies' book is an excellent introduction to the history of the British Isles. The author is at pains to use terms like "British" and "English" only in their proper contexts, and is so careful to avoid anachronism that he refers to historical figures and places only by the names current at the time. King William I, for example, is "Guillaume" in the book. The separate and inter-dependent histories of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales are treated in depth. Unfortunately, the book is marred by several egregious errors of fact; notably the assertion on page 905 (hardback) that the Irish civil war was won by Eamon de Valera's anti-treaty forces. The edition I read also suffered from a lack of proofreading that showed up on almost every page. The concluding chapter on the "Post-Imperial Isles" consists of a series of essays documenting various strands of modern society. These essays are very strongly informed by events of the late 1990s and are somewhat out of keeping with the overall scope of the work. All in all however, for the tolerant reader this book is a most enjoyable route to a solid knowledge of British history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
67 of 71 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Isles - The last dregs of the English empire, March 25, 2000
Davies writes a superb book which is a wonderful antedote to all the horrendous old anglocentric histories I remember reading years ago. In my opinion Davies correctly emphasises the importance of all the constituent parts of the Isles. The book begins by examining the prehistory of the isles and I note that one other reviewer states that he felt this chapter to be a waste of time, concentrating on the minutae of an obscure academic argument. The opening chapter and its discussion readily puts over the point that when talking about place names etc. we cannot remove ourselves from a preconception of history and inevitably produces bias. If that reviewer had persisted with the book I suspect he/she may have got the point by the end. However the book then enters a more traditional history beginning with the Celtic domination of the Isles and proceeding through Roman, Saxon, Norse, Norman and Plantagenet eras of (attempted) domination. With each period there is a three part chapter consisting of a "scene setting" episode, the meat of the history and then a review of conceptions, misconceptions and previous views on those eras. The first part of the chapters are always excellent, the second as good but the third parts tend to be inconsistent, some good some rather tedious. Overall though the layout is good and the appendices at the end are wonderful, having the lyrics and music to various "nationalistic" tunes is a wonderfully original idea. Criticisms of the book are minor in comparison to its overall impact, but here goes. There appeared to me numerous typos in the book ranging from mis-spelling to factual inaccuracies. Whilst this can be forgiven, they did seem to get more frequent towards the end as if the proofreader had gone to sleep. There were inaccuracies and omissions in some of the genealogies notably the suggestion that James II and VII was the son of Charles II, that the old pretender was Charles and many others. The other criticism is that I would have preferred to see more on the more modern history of the non-English parts of the Isles (a large part of the tradition of South Wales for example depends on its mild rebelliousness, eg. Chartist rebellion (Chartism got one sentence), Rebecca riots (never mentioned) and the rise of the unions. These aspects of modern history are far more resonant to the people of South Wales than the musings of early 20th century Welsh language poets important as the language issue is. The history of the struggle to free Ireland is also much too brief. Overall though I would definitely recommend this book to anyone interested in afair history of the Isles.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Well, it's certainly long...., June 11, 2001
This 1000 plus page opus by Norman Davies purports to be an examination of the history of England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland, both in relation to each other and to the rest of the world, from the beginning of human habitation to the present day. If that sounds like a tall order, I'm afraid it is. The Isles is largely fun to read and even educational, but the work as a whole suffers from diffuseness and poor organization. Perhaps this was inevitable. After all, as noted by the previous reviewers, Professor Davies' main point appears to be that the four areas that made up the United Kingdom at its greatest extent are historically and politically distinct entities, and that the development of the history of the Isles is not solely the history of England. Furthermore, Professor Davies is at pains to point out, the birth of the modern United Kingdom was in no way the clean, orderly, almost linear process that it is often made out to be. Therefore, in the development of these ideas, there is, almost by definition, a fragmentary quality to the narrative with a lot of jumping from one region to another, and, in the later (Imperial and post-Imperial) sections of the book, from one topic to another, usually without a clear transition. For the last third of the book, only a semblance of linearity is preserved, with the author hopping from subject to subject, seemingly without a clear direction. While much of the information presented is enormously interesting, I was left with a sense that Professor Davies had overreached, gotten lost within his organizational scheme (or lack thereof), and just couldn't find his way out. So, The Isles is an interesting read, but it could've used a firmer editorial hand. I would definitely turn elsewhere for a survey of the history of the nations of the Isles. In addition to the organizational deficits described above, a number of signal events are only mentioned in passing (as also noted by the previous reviewers), as though familiarity with the basic historical facts were assumed as a prerequisite for understanding the further development of the central themes. For those raised on the history of the region, this assumption may be correct. Most American readers, however, are likely to get a sense of being a stranger at a party where everyone else knows each other.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|