Customer Reviews

It's Alive!

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(4)
1 star:		(2)

 

 

As a longtime fan of cheesemaster Larry Buchanan, I was eager to see these two movies. While I view "Zontar, The Thing From Venus" as the touchstone for Buchanan, this cheesy duo stands on their own peculiar merits.

"It's Alive," from 1969, is the weaker of the two offerings in every sense, so I recommend watching it first. The premise is that a young couple (Tommy Kirk and Shirley Bonne) on a driving holiday run out of gas at Billy Thurman's roadside circus of freaks. Thurman has an involuntarily detained housekeeper who narrates much of the film in a traditional Buchanan collection of flashbacks, and quickly detains the couple as well. The film sort of plays as a weird combination of "Manos, The Hands of Fate" and "Psycho" only without the nuance or character detail of either. Thurman is a sadistic creep who has wildcats and rattlesnakes among other things in his zoo, but his prize possession is the leftover costume from Buchanan's 1967 picture "Creature of Destruction." This monster dwells in a cave under Thurman's house, and while the script assures us it is a huge aquatic lizard, the DVD box refers to it as a "pet dinosaur-man," a premise that is discussed in some hilarious detail in the film. Thurman fairs reasonably as an actor here, but the rest of the cast appears to have never read their lines before.

"It's Alive" is very plodding and suffers from extremely low production values (even by Buchanan's chintzy standards.) The plot is fairly predictable, and borrows a lot of things from other films (in addition to the costume, note the recycled music from "Zontar," etc.) The film really does have a lot of structural similarities to "Manos" especially in the beginning when the couple is lost on their drive. I was amused that in true Manosesque style the final title card read "The End?" In other ways the film borrows heavily from "Zontar" particularly the cave location and conceptual ending of the film. The other amusing similarity I noted (and I can't imagine this was anything but coincidence) was Thurman's resemblance to Ernest Hemingway only without all the character flaws: he looks like him, is an antisocial narcissistic menace, and even his house looks like Hemingway's Key West home. As amusing as they are to contemplate, I seriously doubt any of these choices were made consciously by Buchanan (except perhaps for the "Zontar" parallels.) In sum, "It's Alive" isn't one of Buchanan's best movies, but it's worth seeing for a good dose of cheese.

"Year 2889" is a dour post-nuclear annihilation movie where a group of dissimilar people survive in a big house in a secluded valley, and have to figure out who is going to repopulate the earth. This cast is fronted by former Mouseketeer Paul Petersen and the lovely Quinn O'Hara along with Buchanan regular Neil Fletcher ("Zontar" and "Creature of Destruction") as Captain John Ramsey, the leader of the motley crew. The film is straightforward and bleak, but more exciting and interesting than "It's Alive" for a few reasons. The film has essentially endless discussion of the chances of rain, and when the meteorology angle gets boring, has various subplots running hither and yon involving a psychopathic misogynist, a hilarious monkey-monster with long gray hair, mange, and a fear of water, girls in bikinis swimming in a pool (yes, it's truly a struggle to survive...), and the least sexy dance number in film history.

The lines of conflict are pretty clear and it's no surprise how the film will end: I loved the final shot of a couple holding hands and a title card reading "The Beginning." Nice touch.

The DVD also has a short interview with Paul Petersen outlining his career and discussing some issues related with life in Hollywood and making these films.

This is a great and inexpensive salute to cheese: it isn't Buchanan's best (or worst) work, but it's a fun diversion from the big-budget Hollywood pictures of today.

Oh man...yesterday I 'treated' myself to a mini Larry Buchanan film festival and I am now suffering from hangover like symptoms this morning. I thought it kind of odd that I should watch these two terrible movies on Oscar night, a night when Hollywood celebrates its' best films.

Anyway, Azalea Productions, which worked with American International Television, a subsidiary of American International Pictures (AIP), was sort of a dumping ground for AIP's younger stars that lost some of their sheen. Azalea's productions where beyond cheap, and mostly produced for TV, turning out such schlock as The Eye Creatures (1965), Zontar the Thing from Venus (1966), among others. Larry Buchanan, director of Mars Needs Women (1967), was in charge, and pretty prolific. Retromedia presents two of his more memorable (or forgettable) telefilms here.

It's Alive (1969) stars once popular Disney star Tommy Kirk, who appeared in films like Old Yeller (1957), The Shaggy Dog (1959), and Swiss Family Robinson (1960), but once he became older, lost his appeal towards casting directors and was forced to dwell in movie hell. The plot for this movie is basically a young New York couple, the Sterns, gets lost in the Ozarks, meets Wayne Thomas (Tommy Kirk), a paleontologist working in the area, who directs the Sterns to a nearby house in that they may get some gasoline and make it back to civilization. The secluded house belongs to a man named Greely (Billy Thurman), who also runs a sort of dinosaur park with wild animals that he's captured over the years. He's got snakes, wildcats, monkeys (where the heck did he capture monkeys in the Ozarks?) and something lurking in the caves behind his house, his prize possession. Seems Greely found a prehistoric creature, and feeds the occasional lost traveler to his 'pet'. Wayne comes by to check up on the couple, and Greely knocks him out, and throws him in the cave with the Sterns. Greely also has a housekeeper of sorts living with him, Bella, who, it turns out, was in a similar situation as the young couple a few years ago, and Greely kept her to make meals, clean house, etc. We spend a great deal of time hearing her story and how she tried to escape in what had to be the longest flash back I've ever seen, but since she's relating the story to the couple and Wayne, it seemed utterly pointless to let it go on so long, as we knew she didn't escape. Obviously padding to fill out the 80 minute run time. Anyway, stuff happens, and we actually only get to see the creature for like five minutes, but I suppose that was a good thing as we had already seen it in a previous Azalea made-for-TV film, Creature of Destruction (1967), and the suit hasn't been holding up none too well. This mess finally comes to a close, with the screen displaying The End? I'm serious, they put a question mark after the words 'The End' as if to warn us that someone, one day, will revive these characters, or, at least the plot. Poor Tommy Kirk...

The second film in this festival of pain is called In the Year 2889 (1967), and deals with survivors of a post-nuclear world. This film stars another Disney alum and 50's TV child star Paul Petersen, who many may remember as Jeff Stone on the Donna Reed Show. Seems Captain John Ramsey (Neil Fletcher) has spent a number of year building a home in a secluded valley, one perfectly suited to protect him, his daughter, and her soon to be husband from post nuclear radiation. It has something to do with lead in the cliffs and a lake with an internal hot spring. Anyhow, this secluded valley isn't as secluded as we were led to believe, as various individuals begin to show up. First a young, wayward couple, then Steve (Paul Petersen) and his radiation poisoned brother, and then finally a local rancher/moonshiner, played by Billy Thurman. The captain gets irate, as he had only planned provisions for three people, but now has to deal with seven. He soon has something else to worry about as it's discovered mutants are roaming the valley, eating various game, and tensions within the house begin to grow, developing into a real power struggle. Will the survivors be able to fight off the mutants and keep from killing themselves in the process? Will humanity as we know it disappear from the face of the Earth, or will these people be able to save it from the brink of extinction? To be honest with you, I stopped caring about five minutes in...maybe sitting through the first feature wore me down.

The picture quality was decent on these two films, but wear was noticeable. Both look as if they were shot on 35mm film, and there are plenty of tedious voice-overs. The production quality is non-existent, but I wasn't expecting a lot anyway. There are two special features, one being a piece with Paul Petersen, talking about his experiences in the industry, who he got started and such, and a little of how he ended up in this dog. He also goes on about his cause of helping child stars of past and present avoid the unpleasant experiences he went through being chewed up and spat out by a once uncaring Hollywood system. There is also a nifty photo gallery of Paul Petersen including stills of himself, and pictures of his various projects including records and books. Not a bad release of some truly awful films, good for a few laughs...and I have to say, Billy Thruman, a veteran of many a Buchanan film, was kind of fun to watch, especially in It's Alive.

Cookieman108

Who cares what anyone says negatively about Larry Buchanan's
films. Personally this is good cult movie entertainment. One
cannot properly critique a "cult movie" like mainstream films.
Either you appreciate this art form for what it is or stay with
regular fare. If you like Ed Wood type of filmaking get this DVD.

If any of you are familiar with Larry Buchanan(from MST3K for starters),then you know he did Attack of the the Eye Creatures,but these 2 films are just as bad,if not worse(if that's possible!).The first movie "It's Alive!" only has 2 scenes of the monster and that's it! The flashback is way too long and could've been summed up in 2 sentences at least.The second feature is a little better and the creature you see alot more,but still,there are no thrills,no suspense-nothing!!..The best way to view these films is to hand these over to MST3K and let them do the rest!!!...Bad movies? Sure,but no fun at all to sit through.......

It's Alive (1968) American International Pictures moved into television in the mid 1960's with a package of their black and white 1950's movies, which local stations would purchase and then show during their movie programs . But the value of the package would be more if AIP could include more color films with the black and white ones, so the ever clever heads of AIP, Sam Arkoff and Jim Nicholson, came up with a plan: give somebody a tiny amount of money, some color 16mm film, and access to the scripts of those earlier movies and let that someone produce some color remakes with new titles they could include in their movie package to boost its value. The someone in question was Texas filmmaker Larry Buchanan, and for about the cost of one of AIP's color Poe films, Buchanan produced eight (!) movies for AIP! This particular movie was not a remake, but a second movie to re-use a monster suit Buchanan had previously featured in Creature of Destruction, one of the AIP remakes. This time out a guy named Greely (Bill Thurman) out in the boonies around the Ozark mountains supplements his failing exotic animal roadside attraction with a real humdinger: a prehistoric creature in a cave behind his house. The problem is, once you go into the cave to look at the beastie, the completely insane Greely locks you in for feeding time. Guess what the monster gets for dinner? Former Disney star Tommy Kirk (The Shaggy Dog) serves time in this filmic purgatory as a forest ranger captured by Thurman along with a married couple who had the bad luck to run out of gas right outside Greely's house. Lots of talk ensues. Then, finally the creature pops up very briefly well into the running time to claim the young husband, and good ol' Buchanan doesn't even try to camouflage how sketchy it looks with some smoke or weird camera angles. No, he shoots it straight on, giving the audience a good look at a man in an extremely ratty rubber body suit topped off by a dime store monster mask with ping pong ball eyes. -sigh- After this wonderful moment, the creature goes back into the depths of the cave and the movie somehow manages to slow down further by having Greely's long suffering housekeeper Bella start hanging out near the prisoners so she can relate how she came to be in Greely's clutches in a loooooong flashback obviously added to get this thing up to feature length. From there, the creature returns for his second and final appearance as we amble into a climax of a sort and the movie comes to an end, or at least to a stop. To sum this one up: it's pretty sad to see poor ol' Tommy here, sliding down several notches below Disney and even a few from the beach movies he'd made for AIP the previous couple of years; on the other hand, Thurman is actually pretty good as the nutjob, the story idea is not bad, and before it stretches out far too long Bella's flashback is pretty grim and creepy. But these elements are lost in a talky flick that doesn't even give the viewer regular monster breaks but tries to make do with those two paltry creature cameos. I can only recommend this one to Tommy Kirk completists.

First of all I would like to say that I'm a huge fan of the old stuff!You want to know why?Because Hollywood's idea of great
entertainment these days is pretty much just throw in as much action and visual effects as possible without focusing on whether
anyone in the audience could care a hoot about the characters
involved in it!And what the heck,just add as much profanity,nudity,
drug use,and gore as possible and it'll be a huge hit!These 2 rare
gems from film director,LARRY BUCHANAN,are great because they focus
a heck of a lot on character development and there is certainly a
lot of meat to both of their stories.IT'S ALIVE!is my personal
favorite of the two.It has a really dark and creepy story about
an old man who at first acts friendly to anyone who gets lost on
the main highway,but unknown to the unsuspecting visitors is that
the kind elder man is completely PSYCHO in every way!He manages to
lure our group of heroes into a cave in which he hides his most
prized possesion--- a man-eating dinosaur named a Massosaurus(well
at least by TOMMY KIRK'S paleontologist character)and then the
ultimate fight and battle for survival begins!YEAR 2889 is a pretty
decent remake of the ROGER CORMAN classic,"DAY THE WORLD ENDED",and for all of you fans of teen-heartthrob PAUL PETERSEN from "THE DONNA REED SHOW" this movie will not disappoint,since
after all he is the leading man in this baby!And also for you
PAUL PETERSEN fans the DVD comes with a PAUL PETERSEN photo gallery
and documentary of the star as well!So,check it out!

It's Alive (Larry Buchanan, 1969)

First things first: let's not get this made-for-TV monstrosity confused with the cult classic 1974 Larry Cohen film of the same name. They are far different beasts. That one's a bona fide classic guilty pleasure; after watching this one, you just feel guilty.

This one deals with a psychotic backwoods farmer type named Greely (the late Billy Thurman, these days probably best remembered for Close Encounters of the Third Kind) who makes a habit of collecting animals. He keeps one of them in a system of caverns on his property, and when it gets hungry, he feeds it passing people who got lost and wandered down the road. How often this happens we can't rightly say, but in the timeframe of the film, we get a couple from New York, Norman (Corverth Ousterhouse in his only screen appearance) and Leila (Shirley Bonne, a character actress on the verge of retirement at the time) Sterns, and the helpful paleontologist who directed them to the farm, Wayne Thomas (Tommy Kirk of Mars Needs Women, the only one in the bunch still working). Once everyone's trapped in the cave, Greely spends some time taunting them, while his live-in maid Bella (Deadly Blessing's Annabelle Weenick) tries to find small ways to help them. When they ask her why, then, oh my, the flashback appears.

It's not really a terrible film until the flashback. It's a bad one, yes, but it doesn't really hit the depths until the distorted camera, the lack of sound, the endless narration, all of which, it is painfully obvious to the viewer, were added because the thing was too short and they needed an extra half-hour of screen time to make sure they got enough deodorant commercials in. I can forgive everything else about this movie, including some of the worst monster special effects I've ever seen (and prepare yourself for the big climax, during which you will laugh yourself silly at the incredulity of it all), but that extended flashback is just painful. To be fair, Buchanan (who also provides some really terrible narration at the beginning of the movie) knew he wasn't a great director, and relished comparisons between his work and that of Edward D. Wood, Jr.; this is definitely a movie that shows why such comparisons were made. *

I happen to like b movies; I admit it. I'm quite willing to overlook the low end nature of many of these films for the sake of entertainment. Roger Corman's sci-fi quickies from the 50's and 60's come to mind., but while Corman's efforts were often greater than the sum of their parts, these two turkeys have absolutely nothing to recommend them. Wooden acting, shoddy production values and leaden pacing add to the misery for both flicks. "Year 2889", by the way, is a note for note remake of Corman's 1955 film "The Day the World Ended". I suppose a fairer comparison might be to Ed Wood's so terrible it's funny "Plan nine from outer space", but while that movie is good for a few unintended laughs, these two films are the cinematic equivalent of novacaine.

A gold digger Greely (Bill Truman) is disinvested of his gold but in the process discovers a new friend. His friend (also Thurman) has a nasty overbite and has a voracious apatite for people that have stilted and contrived dialog. Like the proverbial spider he invites people with no outside ties such as Leila and Norman Sterns (Shirley Bonne, Corveth Ousterhouse) into his home and introduces them to his friend. Looks like a nosy paleontologist (Tommy Kirk of "Mars Needs Women" fame) is approaching and must also be disposed.

Can the paleontologist convince Greely to display his friend?
Will the only cute female Leila chose the odd smiling Greely over his friend?
Will the sarcastic, uncaring, and snotty Norman get free or become the appetizer?

Stay toned and do not fall asleep or you may be next.

everything just barely ok as far as the entertainment of ITS ALIVE xcept needs more personal monsta story/action, and its face is too fake. acting good, best by the bella character, cool to see tom kirk here. was sad when bella had ""to go". bill thurman-the madman was a craze dum mean trip. this is prob. 1 of lare's" buchanan only best and orig. film. it was 'bout time. YEAR2889 not as good as the orig.-day world ended.