34 of 36 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Good Start, but sluggish ending for this `Social' History, March 28, 2006
Catherine Merridale, a professor of contemporary history at the University of London, has written a nuanced social history of the Soviet soldier in the Second World in Ivan's War. This volume is not a military history and readers expecting such will be disappointed, but Merridale does offer an insightful glance into the soul of "Ivan" - the "G.I. Joe" of the Red Army. Overall, Ivan's War does provide context that is often lacking in other works about the East Front and this is a worthy effort, although the results that Merridale does achieve are open to debate. The main idea that Merridale's work conveys is that the sacrifices made by both the Soviet soldiers and citizens were betrayed by a Stalinist regime that saw them as only "little cogs in a machine." In the end, thanks to Ivan's tenacity, Merridale writes, "the motherland was never conquered" by the fascists but it had been enslaved by its own communist leaders.
The driving concept between this type of approach to history is to use oral accounts from veterans to add texture to broad themes that the author can then develop. To be honest, Merridale does not seem to have much flair for oral history and too many of her accounts are rather tepid. I get the impression that the Soviet vets either didn't want to talk to her since she was a foreigner - she hints at this - and those men she did interview were not the most desirable subjects. Given the availability of better Soviet accounts that have appeared since the fall of Communism, I find it hard to believe that Merridale could not have gotten some better material. Readers should note that Merridale's examination of "Ivan" is far from comprehensive - not only are there no accounts from the Red Air Force or Navy, but important branches such as artillery and cavalry are all but ignored. One need only go to "the Russian Battlefield" website to find dozens of veterans accounts, sorted by branch, that provide better detail than the accounts offered in Ivan's War. It is also odd that Merridale rarely mentions specific Soviet army units, even though Soviet vets are often proud of having served in this or that unit.
It is clear that Merridale has researched Soviet archives carefully. Unfortunately, I'm not sure that she knows how to use much of the information that she has gathered. For example, on page 215 she writes that 310,000 Soviet tankers were killed in the war out 403,000 trained, which seems like 76% fatalities. However, when I checked the footnoted source I realized that these numbers referred to only the period 1943-45 and also included personnel from mechanized units. Readers should treat her facts and figures with some circumspection.
Overall, the first two-thirds of the book, which covers the pre-war period up to 1944 is fairly interesting and well-written. This part of the book is quite enjoyable. Unfortunately, the last one-third of the book covers the period 1945 up to the current day and seems interminable. Somehow, the author's description of how Russian women wanted to marry wounded veterans for their pensions seems neither unique to the USSR or pertinent to life in the Red Army in 1939-45. In the last 70-80 pages or so the author appears to be wandering, having lost her focus once she passes VE Day.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
37 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
When memory fails, February 25, 2006
This is a great book; it's been well-reviewed both in the press and here on Amazon.
However, the reviews have failed to mention what I found to be one of the most important features of the book: The significant lacunae in the historical record of the Red Army. Merridale shows how completely the historical reality of the Red Army experience has been replaced by the state-sanctioned mythology. Merridale describes sorting through the archives, sealed for sixty years, and finding that even the confidential reports by the internal Party spies are filled with bland pious generalities. Even as they were fighting and dying, the Army was selectively editing its official memory, removing any evidence of venality, cowardice, war crimes, insubordination and so on.
More disturbingly, the veterans Merridale interviews have edited their own memories, often describing scenes from propaganda movies as if they actually experienced them first-hand. Merridale's sympathetic treatment of the veterans' accounts makes this crime against memory all the more disturbing. In fact, Merridale's most vivid primary sources are the letters and diaries of front-line soldiers (most of whom were killed in action), preserved by grieving families.
In an odd way, Merridale's book is the perfect complement to a political-theoretical book like Hannah Arendt's "Totalitarianism". Arendt describes how the totalitarian state can control every aspect of human existence. Merridale shows that this control extended even to the chaos and relative freedom of the front line.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
46 of 52 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An excellent social history of the wartime Red Army, February 7, 2006
Merridale has written an excellent social history of the Red Army and why Russian soldiers continued to fight throughout the war. Merridale believes that songs about missing loved ones,a personal faith in God, and a belief that Stalin's Russia would change after the war contributed to the fighting spirit of the Red Army soldier. Merridale also describes vividly the hell of the battle of Kerch in which thousands of Russian soldiers suffocated to death and Kursk in which tank crewmen suffered serious burns to their bodies. Merridale also writes about how these soldiers missed and distrusted their wives and this sense of sexual frustration ultimately contributed to the raping of Berlin in 1945. The only weakness of Merridale's book is that she leaves out the works by Dale Herspring which detail how commissars kept alive the morale of Russian soldiers and skims over the works by Robert Thurston who states how the Red Army soldier fought the war for ideological purposes. Despite these flaws this an important contribution to the study of the wartime Red Army.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No