Most Helpful Customer Reviews
35 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Steve Richter, Dix Hills, NY, September 9, 2000
This review is from: JVC GCQX3U 3.2MP Digital Camera w/ 2.3x Optical Zoom (Electronics)
Superb state of the art camera which is value priced in today's market. I had been waiting for digital camera resolution to reach the equivalent of 35 MM photography -- it has finally occurred with the advent of 3+ mega pixels. This camera has 3 advanced pixel shifting modes which generate results equivalent to 6 MEGA PIXELs. When the pictures are printed as 8" X 10" blowups on my 2400 X 1200 DPI Lexmark ($175) inkjet, they are equal to my 35MM 8" X 10"s (magnificent). Extremely easy to use, with many features such as: Collage (taking 1 photo and superimposing a 2nd photo upon it so that it appears as if the subject from pic 1 was in the location of pic 2 -- a different background), video streaming where a succession of 20 seconds of stills run together as a clip which can be emailed as motion video, red eye reduction built into the flash, USB port for direct input to a computer or printer, Video port for input to a TV, Calendar to time /date stamp if desired, Macro capability which I recently used to take pictures of pictures, etc. And the price at our local electronics store was $699!!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
39 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Apparently not all GC-QX3's are alike, December 20, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: JVC GCQX3U 3.2MP Digital Camera w/ 2.3x Optical Zoom (Electronics)
The GC-QX3 is my only digital camera, so I don't have much of a comparison, but I am not thrilled. It takes beautiful pictures outdoors in the bright sunlight, but it completely falls apart in low light situations. The auto mode is essentially worthless indoors. At least half the time the camera gets the white balance wrong, and the pictures are all blue. I mean REALLY blue, unfixably blue. Flash pictures, in addition to being blue, are usually severely under exposed. Even though this camera has three different sensitivities, it always takes auto mode flash pictures at the lowest sensitivity (ASA 80 equivalent). I have completely given up trying to use the camera indoors in auto mode. I set white balance, sensitivity and exposure manually. This is a real pain if I am in a point and shoot situation, and even then, I never really know what I am going to get. The display on the back is nice for previews, but it is worthless for judging picture quality. JVC has the worst customer support that I have ever seen. I have tried to talk to them about my problems, but they refuse to answer my email. Their web site gives me the address of the JVC service center to which I can take the camera, but when I talk to the people who actually work there, they tell me that no one there knows anything about the GC-QX3, and they are sure that it is not one of the products which they service. After reading as much as I can find about this camera, I am not at all convinced that mine is defective. It is sounding more and more like just bad design. I gave it a 3 rating because the pictures taken in plenty of light are stunning. Look somewhere else (I wish I knew where) if you plan to take a lot of indoor pictures.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
42 of 44 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Not Bad, but..., November 22, 2000
This review is from: JVC GCQX3U 3.2MP Digital Camera w/ 2.3x Optical Zoom (Electronics)
After reading quite a few reviews and speaking with several camera users, I decided to purchase this camera at a local store. At first, I was more than satisfied but quickly realized a couple of problems: Like most digital cameras, battery life is limited. With this camera though, the battery was almost empty after 12 pictures. To make matters worse, it uses a proprietary battery that is only available through their Web Site. Next, when using the viewfinder, my nose was always resting on the screen. Thus causing smudges all the time. All in all not a bad camera, but for the price there are better.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|