| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jane Austen does a fine job of relaying the details of its subject's life--her relationship with her family and friends, the indignities of her unfortunate financial circumstances, and her pleasure in the success of those novels she lived to see published. But more than that, Myer delves into the mores and manners of Austen's times--the importance placed on marriage, respectability, and financial security, all central to the author's novels. Most engaging is Myer's exploration of Jane Austen's prickly, imperfect personality, revealed through letters, diaries, and the recollections of her family. In Jane Austen the reader discovers a fully-drawn woman, complete with flaws, strengths, and a burning talent that lives on today, 200 years after her death. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A nice try but better books on Austen exist,
This review is from: Jane Austen: Obstinate Heart (Paperback)
I think Valerie Grovesnor Myer has made a nice stab at trying to write to a biography of Austen and she succeeds relatively well. The only trouble biographies of Austen are all drawn from the same material - very little new material has been turned up in recent years and so biographers are forced to reinterpret the old sources to find a new angle. And that really is what this author has done - with only moderate success.She has 24 chapters, mostly chronological although really the complaint that this is mostly about Austen's family than Austen herself bears through - especially in the first nine chapters. To make her book different again Myer has attempted to find biographical incidents from Austen's own life to explain incidents in her novels. Not a bad thing to do - but I found it overpowering at times - as though she were just going from one incident to another - and sometimes I felt her examples used weren't good ones. For instance she likened Jane Austens' brother Edward's adoption by the Knights as being like Fanny Price's living with the Bertrams in her 'Mansfield Park'. Which is not at all the same situation. In the novel Fanny lived with the family but was never adopted by them. In real life, Edward adopted the new surname of Knight and eventually inherited a large estate and fortune from it. The whole situation in fact reminds one of Frank Churchill in 'Emma' - Frank Weston is adopted by his aunt, Mrs Churchill, adopts her name and becomes her heir. It seems that is a much better example - why did Myer use the much less satisfactory one? Another point is that she shows that she has read various books on Austen (for instance Deidre Le Faye's collected letters of Austen) but doesn't seem to have done much research outside of those on the history of the period. Myer cites a letter from Austen to her neice Fanny Knight in which she talks of the whole race of 'Pagets'. Myer has clearly used the footnote which is in Le Faye's edition of the letters to explain this remark about Austen's dislike of the Pagets - explaining about Lord Paget's (later Marquess of Anglesey) elopement with Lady Charlotte Wellesley. What both Le Faye and Myer miss is that the year before this elopement there was another High profile Paget elopement when Lord Paget's brother eloped with Lady Boringdon. A little extra research on Myer's part would have revealed this fact. I found the book interesting though for Myer's interpretation, but I wouldn't pick it by choice. If you are looking for a really good biography of Jane - Park Honan's is much better - or Claire Tomalin's. There are other great books on the history of the time you can read - Maggie Lane is great - and Deidre Le Faye's collection of letters is fabulous. So there is a lot of much better material out there. But if this is all you can get hold of - well it would do in a pinch.
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not satisfying,
By microfiche (Scarborough, ON Canada) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Jane Austen: Obstinate Heart (Hardcover)
I would buy this book if it were on a discount table because of the scraps of information about country life in the late Georgian period and if I could not get a copy of Jane Austen's letters; but I would rather buy a book about each than this book about both. It's hardly a dime novel; it's a list of her visits her family and her friends. The prose sounds like: Jane went here. Jane wrote to her sister who was staying there. Jane disliked one sister-in-law. Jane liked another sister in law. I think the reason a sillouette of Jane is on the cover is that the reader is treated to a bio of a shadow person. There is nothing in Jane's life above the daily commonplace lot here; yet there must have been something within Jane or in the way Jane saw her surroundings that was not commonplace to her because Jane's novels are not commonplace to us. As to any - ahem - kennel comparisons: a Jane Austen novel is like a well prepared pitcher of lemonade - enough sugar and water to soften the juice but not enough to subdue it. Why shouldn't her family letters be the same? I don't think this author dislikes Jane. I know many tart tongued women and enjoy their conversation (when I'm not the subject of it). They're usually very wise and dicerning. This book cried out for foot/end notes that tied the above scraps of info to a source - either to a letter or a book in the Selected Bibliography (why "selected"?) so they can be verified. It's not good for study purposes.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Warning, this book is dreadful!,
By sophie "sophie" (Sweden) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Jane Austen: Obstinate Heart (Paperback)
I must say that I am in shock after having read this "biography". The author clearly does not understand irony - so then why bothering reading Jane Austen at all? Writing about her and being so unappreciative of her qualities must be considered an abuse by any true Jane Austen fan. Why is V. G. Myer so eager to make Jane Austen look like a bitter spinster that never experienced love end therefore hated every women who did marry and have children? Is the author that kind of lady who becomes very frightened when she meets with an intelligent woman with a sharp tongue - because she clearly can't stand Jane Austen's sense of humor. And, on top of it all, she has not done a good work when it comes to the research. I strongly doubt that she has read James Edward Austen Leigh's "Memoirs", she misquotes him and misunderstands him on some very crucial points. She just one of these authors trying to make money out of Jane Austen without making any effort whatsoever.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|