Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Champion of the 'common reader' writes for academics, November 15, 2008
Rating a book like this is somewhat difficult, because it depends in part upon audience. This is a book that defends ordinary readers of Jane Austen, but I would not say that it is a book for them. Given the subtitle: "The Art of Clarity," the cover, a detail of a painting by Turner, seemed ironic. The painting is a somewhat crudely painted room inhabited by vaguely human-shaped blobs of paint. Whatever one may think of Turner, "clarity" is not an adjective I would use for the illustration. (Oddly enough, the illustration looks better in the little reproduction on Amazon than it does in person. Apparently, one needs to stand back from Turner's painting.) Gard's writing is not a model of clarity either: his sentences are often convoluted, extremely long, include untranslated French passages, and forced me to seek a dictionary a number of times. One also needs to have read more 18th & 19th century literature than I have, since Gard is forever attempting to make a point by comparing Austen to some other work that I haven't read and that isn't sufficiently explained. I have read Madame Bovary, but I don't remember anything about her greyhound, so the comparison to Pug in Mansfield Park eludes me. That said, perhaps this is the sort of thing that professionals in literary criticism expect; indeed, I've read a lot worse, so perhaps I should only say that I don't recommend it to most people. Gard does have a very worthwhile overall point, though. He argues that, contrary to what literary historians may argue, it is not necessary to do extensive research into Austen's life and times to understand her works. They are clear as they stand. I personally have read a number of the types of books that he mentions, like Alison Sulloway's Jane Austen and the Province of Womanhood, which I liked and Gard doesn't. I would agree with him that such reading is not necessary to understand Austen's work, although it can be interesting. I have an interest in the period beyond my enjoyment of Jane Austen, so I found it fascinating, but I don't think that I suddenly understand the books much better. I thank Gard for his confidence in common readers.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
On Gard: A Labored Austen Tribute, April 20, 2011
The Yale University Press specializes in cogent academic commentaries. Roger Gard's Jane Austen's Novels: the Art of Clarity is a worthy addition to that tradition. However, the book was somewhat disappointing in its method and writing style. See the reviews by Elizabeth A. Root and Tracey Marks, with whom I agree. Gard assumes a working familiarity with the novels; this is not a hornbook for novices. His style is also dense, more so than lay readers of Austen may find comfortable. The `art of clarity' in his subtitle is Austen's, not his. Still, there is much to recommend. Gard, a former Reader at Oxford, not only knows his subject, but delights in it. This is a welcome change from the ideologic criticism of feminists and more radical theorists who fancy themselves Jane-ites, but miss much of the artistry, complexity of plot structure, and good humor that undergirds Austen's reputation. He also avoids the error of treating the novels as one world, with interchangable characters; his focus on each novel as a discrete work of art is critically correct, and it allows him to trace the development of Austen as an artist. I recommend the book for the serious student of Austen.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Definitely NOT recommended!, February 15, 2009
As an instructor of Jane Austen courses and writer of Austen-related fiction, I have read several dozen books about Jane Austen and her novels. This is definitely one of the least worthwhile. Ironically, the subtitle "The Art of Clarity" is just as ironic as the opening line of "Pride and Prejudice". The author does NOT write clearly, and takes entire chapters to make a few very weak points (and often talks around a subject without clearly making any point at all!). Fans of Jane Austen seeking greater illumination about her novels would benefit by reading instead Tony Tanner's Jane Austen, Craik's Jane Austen: The Six Novels, Gill and Gregory's Mastering the Novels of Jane Austen, and many others.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
|