26 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Did it REALLY happen that way? I have my doubts., December 6, 2000
This review is from: Jane Rochester:A Novel Inspired by Charlotte Brontė's Jane Eyre (Paperback)
Kimberly Bennett begins her "sequel" at the point where "Jane Eyre" leaves off, with a description of Jane and Edward's wedding day and early married life, as they adjust to each other sexually and otherwise. As if to mimic the original, the sequel also includes a crazy lady with murderous intent, although this one is not locked up and is a bit more of a threat to Edward since he is blind. It also expands upon the Rochesters' relationship to her newfound cousins, the Rivers', as Diana and Mary become brides, and St. John prepares for the mission field in India. The little orphan Adele makes a cameo appearance every so often, as she is mostly at school.
Although I enjoyed the "sequel" for the most part, it really didn't convince me that "that's the way it happened." 1. Being a self-proclaimed "passionate" woman, I don't believe that Jane would have the problems adjusting to a sexual relationship that is described in this book. Nor do I believe that Edward would let it go on for so long! (2) I have some real problems with St. John Rivers' passion for Jane, and her own inner glee when he offers to drop all his missionary plans and run off with her to America. That he might feel such passion doesn't surprise me, but that he would act on it just doesn't seem in character. And that Jane would take pleasure in the suffering of another...well, if she did, she'd never write about it. (3) And that leads to my third point: Jane would never write in such detail about her sexual relationship. THAT is quite definitely a characteristic of TODAY'S romance novels. Perhaps it was necessary to capture the attention of today's readers. But I just don't believe that Charlotte Bronte would have done it that way.
In spite of the above, I would have given this book a four-star rating if it weren't for all the annoying typos and grammar errors in it--more than I've seen in ANY book! Doesn't the editor know the difference between "its" and "it's" or "there" and "their" or the error in saying "Edward and I" when it should be "Edward and me". Believe me, the sheer NUMBER of errors is staggering and makes one suspect that this publishing company is less than professional. Also, books this size are difficult to hold with one hand and require that one be sitting up to read it. PLEASE!
If you're a dyed-in-the-wool Jane Eyre fan, you shouldn't miss this one, but I wouldn't call it a romance exactly since it covers mostly what happens AFTER the "happy ever after" ending of the original novel. So if you're looking for romance, read (or reread) the original!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting concept; unbelievable plot and bad editing, May 16, 2001
This review is from: Jane Rochester:A Novel Inspired by Charlotte Brontė's Jane Eyre (Paperback)
I was excited about this book; 'Jane Eyre' is one of my favorite novels and I was eager to read about Jane and Edward's marriage. Although I was interested enough in it to read it to the end, I do have complaints.
First off, the other reviewers were right in that Jane's voice isn't authentic; she wouldn't be so graphic in her descriptions of the sex scenes. And what's up with Edward? I really don't think he would have returned to being so sullen as he was in Bronte's book. At times he's on fire for Jane (as he should be!) and in other instances he ignores her and acts almost bratty. This certainly isn't the dashing Edward Rochester we all know and love.
If you choose to read this book you'll notice on nearly every page incorrect grammar and misplaced punctuation. The publisher is one I've never heard of, yet *someone* could have taken better care in editing.
All in all, a fair read if you're a true Jane buff (as I am), but don't have high expectations. It's better to buy a used copy or borrow one if possible; at this price you won't get your money's worth. Ms. Bennett *is* a good writer and I believe is capable of a great work, but I think sometimes it's best to leave well alone. Don't mess with a classic!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Don't even bother with this book, December 6, 2001
This review is from: Jane Rochester:A Novel Inspired by Charlotte Brontė's Jane Eyre (Paperback)
"Jane Rochester" is a sad excuse for a novel and should have never even been published. Not only is the plot unimaginitive and unworthy of being considered a sequel to a classic like "Jane Eyre," it is the most poorly edited book I've ever read. There's on average one grammar or spelling mistake on every other page. What a disappointment to readers and lovers of "Jane Eyre" everywhere.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No