Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony [Paperback]

Stephen J. Ceci (Author), Maggie Bruck (Author), Bruce Dennis Sales (Editor)

Book Description

ISBN-10: 1557986320 | ISBN-13: 978-1557986320 | Publication Date: January 1995 | Edition: 1

The credibility of children's testimony is a hotly debated topic in Am erica's courtrooms, universities, and professional organizations. Are children more suggestible than adults, and if so, what are the implica tions for those who work with child witnesses? Using rigorous techniqu es of analysis, the authors examine real-life cases in which children were key witnesses in criminal child abuse trials. Written in lively, accessible language by acknowledged experts in the field, this book wi ll be an invaluable guide for expert witnesses and all those who work with child witnesses, including therapist, social workers, law enforce ment personnel, and lawyers.

Product Details

• Paperback: 336 pages
• Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA); 1 edition (January 1995)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1557986320
• ISBN-13: 978-1557986320
• Product Dimensions: 9.9 x 6.8 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #232,864 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Data-driven and ethical forensic work, October 4, 2002

By 

William M. Grove (Woodbury, MN United States) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony (Paperback)

An excellent guide to the state of current knowledge about memory, suggestibility, and unsuitable vs. suitable information-eliciting techniques, with regard to children's testimony. This book is distinguished from others on the same topic by the scientific reputations of the editors and chapter authors, as well as the cautious approach. Fits in very well with current Supreme Court strictures on the admissibility of expert/science based testimony---Daubert, Joiner, & Kumho decisions.

17 of 20 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars The most important book in my libarary, January 31, 1999

By 

Jennifer P. Lee (Sandy, Utah United States) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony (Hardcover)

This is the most important non-legal book in my library. Anyone who needs to evaluate the credibility of a child's statement should read this book. Even-handed in its approach, it points out those factors most important to consider when assessing a child's accusations.

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Jeopardy in the Courtroom, September 29, 2008

By 

T. Johnson (Dayton, Ohio) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony (Paperback)

Incredible book. Must reading for any conscientious person who questions the merit of what many so-called professionals say about childrens' testimony in abuse...but especially alleged sexual abuse...cases. The book reviews a hundred years of research and presents a very balanced assessment of the strengths of childrens' testimony and the weaknesses, especially when children are submitted to the relentless prodding of adults with a preconceived notion of what they believe has happened to the children. The book calls for caution and balance when submitting children, especially the youngest children, to the forensic process. This book makes it clear that in reality much abuse is done to children by the very system and professionals we trust to protect them. The book is a clarion call to stop the unbridled "mining" in childrens' psyches to uncover abuses that have often not occurred but end up being manufactured by the investigators themselves because they refuse to believe childrens' repeated initial denials. This book suggests to me that often investigators and so-called professionals are really not operating on the childrens' behalf...to find the truth and protect the children...but are in fact operating on their own behalf to make their reputations and to titillate themselves and their own egos. The book suggests professionals need to be open to all the possibilities and not fix on one explanation for the allegations. Then, each possibility should be examined in light of the evidence that supports it and in light of the evidence that refutes it. As an afterthought, it amazes me that experts cannot figure out that if a child who was allegedly...as many of the allegations go...forced to eat feces; was peed upon; thrown in a pool of sharks; raped with knives and other dangerous instruments but came home every day to mom and dad with no mental/emotional distress; no fear; no stinky odor etc., in other words no symptoms of abuse, the conclusion should be the children were never perpetrated on. Any assertion to the contrary is a ridiculous premise of the experts- that children can have all sorts of horrendous, vile deeds perpetrated on them and yet be symptom free. To account for this notion, they have had to invent "repressed memory of childhood abuse"- that the horror of what allegedly "happened" to the children was banished from their memory as a self-protective device. This far out postulate is almost totally a construct of the experts own wild imaginations, with almost no scientific research or literature to support it, except what these experts manufacture themselves and then other experts quote back and forth as if it is fact. These experts are truly "legends in their own minds". These experts are monsters who have made innocent children and families their personal professional "playground". But, today being a professional means "never having to say you're wrong" and "never having to say you're sorry".