Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Kindle Edition
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality: Explode the Myths, Heal the Church
 
 
Start reading Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality: Explode the Myths, Heal the Church [Paperback]

Jack Rogers (Author)
4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (49 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $9.49  
Paperback $10.12  
Paperback, February 10, 2009 --  
Unknown Binding --  
There is a newer edition of this item:
Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality, Revised and Expanded Edition: Explode the Myths, Heal the Church Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality, Revised and Expanded Edition: Explode the Myths, Heal the Church 4.1 out of 5 stars (49)
$10.12
In Stock.

Book Description

February 10, 2009
In a powerful new book, evangelical theologian and former Moderator of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Jack Rogers argues unequivocally for equal rights in the church and in society for people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. Throughout history, he observes, Christianity has moved towards ever greater openness and inclusiveness. Today's church is led by many of those who were once cast out: people of color, women, and divorced and remarried people. He argues that when we interpret the Bible through the lens of Jesus' redemptive life and ministry, we see that the church is called to grant equal rights to all people. Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality describes Rogers' own change of mind and heart on the issue; charts the church's well-documented history of using biblical passages to oppress marginalized groups; argues for a Christ-centered reading of Scripture; debunks oft-repeated stereotypes about gays and lesbians; and concludes with ideas for how the church can heal itself and move forward again. A fascinating combination of personal narrative, theology, and church history, this book is essential reading for all concerned with the future of the church and the health of the nation. "This is an extraordinary book, arguably the best to appear in the long, drawn-out debates within churches over homosexuality," says J. Philip Wogaman, former senior minister at Foundry United Methodist Church in Washington, D.C. "Rogers book will be useful to people of ALL mainline denomination..." says the Right Reverend V. Gene Robinson, Episcopal Bishop of New Hampshire. "For those who truly wish to know what the Bible does and does not say, this is a real find."


Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

"The book is masterful at describing how the church can learn from its past struggles in moving forward beyond the current divide. Rogers issues a prophetic and persuasive call for a more inclusive and more faithful church." —Jeffrey S. Siker, Professor & Chair, Department of Theological Studies, Loyola Marymount University

"A valuable book has gotten even better in this new revised edition. Rogers's new prefatory relating of particular stories is compelling, the appendix draws important information together from other denominations, and the new chapter 8 will be useful to many. I strongly recommend this book." —J. Philip Wogaman, Professor Emeritus of Christian ethics, Wesley Theological Seminary, and former senior minister at Foundry United Methodist Church in Washington, D.C.

"Searching Scripture even more widely, sharing the progress towar d equality across a broad range of denominations and describing his encounters with so many devout LGBT folk, Jack shows us how we can biblically and truthfully include all our children in the gospel promise, 'Jesus loves me, this I know.'" —Rev. Janet Edwards, Parish Associate, Community of Reconciliation, Pittsburgh, PA

"Rogers is more than a professor. He is one of the great evangelists of our time. He has heard the good news of God's love for all people, and he has given his life to sharing that news with others. This is a book that saves lives." —Ted A. Smith, Assistant Professor of Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt Divinity School --This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.

Amazon.com Review

Praise for the Revised and Expanded Edition

"Rogers offers both a rigorous yet accessible theological study and a model of spiritual discernment that is essential reading for anyone struggling to reconcile their faith with the needs of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community." —Harry Knox, Director, Religion and Faith Program, The Human Rights Campaign

"The compelling biblical and theological case Jack Rogers makes for the full acceptance of gay couples is simply impossible to ignore." —William Stacy Johnson, Princeton Theological Seminary, author of A Time to Embrace: Same-gender Relationships in Religion, Law, and Politics.

"Rogers's biblical scholarship, humane love, and openness to evidence helps us discern what Jesus would do, and what we, his people, should do." —David G. Myers, Hope College, co-author, What God Has Joined Together: The Christian Case for Gay Marriage.

"I'm overflowing with gratitude for this work. Jack Rogers continues 'to equip the saints for the work of ministry,' directing his gifts as prophet, evangelist, pastor and teacher to building new understandings and relationships in the church." —Rev. Deborah A. Block, Pastor, Immanuel Presbyterian Church, Milwaukee, WI --This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 176 pages
  • Publisher: Westminster John Knox Press (February 10, 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0664229395
  • ISBN-13: 978-0664229399
  • Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 6 x 0.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 8 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (49 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #432,592 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Professor of Theology Emeritus at San Francisco Theological Seminary.
Vice President for Southern California of San Francisco Theological Seminary (1990-1999)
Moderator of the 213th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) (2001-2002)
Associate for Theological Studies in the Theology and Worship Ministry Unit, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) (1988-1990)
Professor of Philosophical Theology at Fuller Seminary (1971-1988)
Professor of Philosophy, Westminster College, PA (1963-1971)


 

Customer Reviews

49 Reviews
5 star:
 (34)
4 star:
 (3)
3 star:
 (3)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (7)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.1 out of 5 stars (49 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

95 of 111 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars An opportunity to heal the church, May 16, 2006
By 
Janine Adams (Louisville, CO USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality: Explode the Myths, Heal the Church (Paperback)
The issue of whether to allow ordination and marriage of people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender is being debated in almost every major Christian denomination. This book is essential reading for anyone who wants to be informed about this issue. It's meticulously researched (483 footnotes!) but also very clear and accessible. It's thoroughly Biblical--something that I believe will be appreciated by people on both sides of the debate. Dr. Rogers wrote the book from his own Presbyterian perspective but it will be a wonderful resource for people of all Christian denominations. Looking at each chapter in turn:

Chapter 1, "Studying Homosexuality for the First Time," describes Dr. Rogers' background as an evangelical and how he first began to study the issue of homosexuality in his local congregation.

Chapter 2, "A Pattern of Misusing the Bible to Justify Oppression," documents how leading theologians, for two hundred years, misused the Bible to try to justify the enslavement of people of African descent and the subordination of women to men.

Chapter 3, "A Breakthrough in Understanding the Word of God," shows how Biblical interpretation has changed for the better over the last two hundred years.

Chapter 4, "Interpreting the Bible in Times of Controversy," outlines the 7 guidelines on Biblical interpretation officially adopted by the Presbyterian Church and applies them to the issue of homosexuality.

Chapter 5, "What the Bible Says and Doesn't Say about Homosexuality," takes a close look at each of the passages that supposedly condemn people who are LGBT and shows that much of the conventional wisdom about these passages is simply incorrect. There's also a great discussion in here about how Acts 10-15 provides a helpful model for how the church can resolve this issue.

Chapter 6, "Real People and Real Marriage," shares the stories of actual gay and lesbian Christians and debunks the stereotypes and cliches that so often characterize this debate.

Chapter 7, "Healing the Church," includes recommendations for what the Presbyterian Church needs to do to make things right and to heal the divisions in the church.

If we choose to listen, the thoughtful scholarship in this book presents a tremendous opportunity for the church to affirm its biblical and confessional tradition while also welcoming people who are LGBT as full and equal members.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


39 of 45 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Author gets Barth wrong, September 19, 2007
By 
Andrew G. Lang (Cleveland, OH USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality: Explode the Myths, Heal the Church (Paperback)
This book has much to commend it, but the author's summary of Barth on male-female relationships (and his subsequent rejection of same-gender love) disregards Barth scholarship of the past 10 years, and is a superficial reading of Church Dogmatics in any case. A brief conversation with George Hunsinger at Princeton--one of the leading Barth scholars in North America--would have cleared this up and resulted, I think, in a very different argument. Eberhard Busch, Barth's longtime secretary and a respected theologian in his own right, would also have been helpful.

Barth, in the last months of his life, dictated a letter to a pastor struggling with the issue of homosexuality, in which he said that while he was too old to give the issue the attention it deserved, he suspected that if he were to rewrite the offending paragraphs in Church Dogmatics III.4, he would have said that homosexual relationships, too, shared in "freedom for community." That comment is brief, but striking, since "freedom for community" is precisely the divine gift in which heterosexual married partners participate, according to Barth.

To argue that Barth believed that the male or female is incomplete without the other does not mean that Barth concluded heterosexual marriage was normative for everyone. In fact, in the context of Protestant theology in the early 50s when Barth wrote III.4, he rather boldly praised vocational celibacy and reminded the reader that Jesus had no wife. Therefore, if Rogers is right, Barth believed that Jesus was "incomplete" or "not fully human" because he was unmarried.

On the contrary, if you dig deep enough, you can see a trajectory leading from III.4 to the comment near the end of his life that same-gender relationships might also be seen as a divine gift that leads to "freedom for community." So Rogers missed an opportunity to approach the issue constructively in a Barthian context: instead, he merely concedes Barth to those Barthians whose reading, like his, of Church Dogmatics is one-sided. Thus, Barth has to be rejected as a theologian of "male superiority" who has nothing to contribute to the debate. The sad thing is that up-to-date Barth scholarship--which would have called this view into question--was available to the author in his own church.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Thoughtful and challenging presentation for full inclusion of LGBT community within the Church and society [1st edition], June 6, 2010
By 
Jack Rogers has written a concise articulation of how a Christian can (and should) seek equal rights for those in the gay and lesbian communities. Rogers approaches this issue from a variety of different angles, not restricting his case or discussion to one area such as Biblical references to homosexuality. Here are several of these perspectives or angles and some of what he states concerning them:

--The pattern of misusing and abusing the Bible in order to justify oppression: Rogers focuses in on slavery (or Black civil rights) and woman's rights. In both cases, these groups were viewed as inferior based upon a biblical curse, their moral character, and their willfully sinful nature. Rogers briefly attempts to explain how seemingly upright individuals could come to hold such repugnant views, concluding that it was a mixture of bad biblical interpretation and philosophical presuppositions. He finally notes that the same pattern has reappeared in the LGBT controversy with gays and lesbians simply taking the place of Blacks and women.

--Biblical interpretation methodology: On this issue, Rogers contends that the general or persistent themes surrounding the life and purpose of Jesus are to be given interpretative priority over individual passages isolated from this overarching narrative. As he states, "The Bible is a story, and its central character is Jesus Christ" (56). Rogers thinks that these general themes should be held in the forefront when interpreting each passage of Scripture, especially passages referring to narrow commandments or moral prerogatives. In light of this, he holds that Jesus' words on divorce should be seen as ideals desired to be held but not slavishly enforced. Regarding homosexuality, the centrality of God's love and the need to love one's neighbor is seen as providing good grounds for equal treatment of homosexuals.

--Specific Biblical texts related to homosexuality: Here he argues that all of the texts proffered as evidence for the immorality of homosexuality fall short of establishing this. His primary claim is that none of these passages address homosexuals involved in committed and loving relationships. The homosexual activity referred to in these passages always have some other element (e.g., prostitution, ritual uncleanliness, etc.) that makes them disanalogous to the contemporary homosexual.

--Engaging living examples of homosexual commitment: Rogers thinks that actually meeting and witnessing the commitment and love present in homosexual relationships can serve as evidence for accepting God's blessing of such a relationship. Following several New Testament scholars, he thinks that Acts 15, in which the gentiles were included in the blessings of the covenant, can serve as a precedent for accepting a formerly rejected class based upon seeing God's spirit at work in and with them.

Coming to the book from a traditional perspective, I found his arguments to be interesting, enlightening and challenging. He presents a good case within a small framework. The strength of the book, I think, is in his exposition of the "problem verses." Though his presentation is brief and one-sided, the cultural issues surrounding these passages does at least give one (or at least me!) a moment's pause before coming to the traditional conclusions. There were still, however, several aspects of the book which I found wanting.

Rogers' particular methodology for interpreting Scripture isn't exactly clear and maybe even inconsistent. Coming to the text from a big picture perspective (absent a belief in the inerrancy or infallibility of scripture, which I don't think Rogers' has) presents the problem of discerning which Biblical particulars are to be authoritative--or morally imperative--and which aren't. This approach leads him to hold the view that Jesus' statements about divorce are to be taken as ideals but aren't expected from his followers. Yet when it comes to sexually promiscuous behavior, Rogers seems to think that the Biblical condemnation of this is to be taken at face value. The reasoning on this goes as follows: proper sexual conduct is restricted to married (or at least committed) relationships because that is how God structured human sexual conduct, and we know this from the Bible. But I could envision a proponent of sexually promiscuous behavior presenting a case very similar to the one Rogers presents for homosexuality. If this problem is insuperable (though I doubt it is), the texts specifically related to homosexual behavior would be even more important.

Numerous times Rogers appears to argue with non-sequitors, that is, arguments in which his premises don't support his conclusion. For instance, at one point he exclaims: "Can you imagine Jesus turning away someone who is despised, discriminated against, and distraught to the point of attempting suicide?" with the concluding remark that we "see everyone in this discussion of homosexuality as our sister and brother in Christ" (57). But even if one agrees with Rogers on what Jesus would do in this example, it doesn't follow that one should believe that homosexual behavior is permissible or morally acceptable. Jesus himself proclaimed that many of the people he ministered to were sick and in need of a doctor. In a similar fashion, he references John 7:53-8:11 as supporting his position on homosexual equality (44), but this story ends with "Go and sin no more," so even though there is an accepting and forgiving tone to the story, there is still the call to refrain from sinful behavior. Not too different from these cases, Rogers appears to be confused when discussing the work of Richard Hays, who views homosexuality as an aspect of our fallen and sinful nature. Rogers states, "by singling out a particular group of people, Hays is contradicting the essential Christian message that we are all broken people, saved through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ" (85). There is clearly no contradiction here. Rogers doesn't appear to recognize the possibility that--though we are all fallen--each of us is fallen in a different way and that some of us may be fallen in similar ways, that is, we have similar fallen tendencies. This is quite evident on the Christian doctrine of man and entails no contradictions. Hays may be mistaken that homosexuality is an aspect of being fallen, but it's not because this contradicts some core truth on sin and redemption as Rogers claims. To a lesser extent, some of Rogers' arguments pertaining to the history of biblical justification for oppression are misguided. In short, though these examples should humble us and our ability to see through our cultural prejudices, they're only relevant to the case at hand if--in fact--the traditional view of homosexuality is mistaken, which is the very thing that is at issue.

One minor complaint I had was that he focuses in on debates within the Presbyterian Church too much for a book devoted to healing "The Church." He constantly references various disputes and decisions reached throughout the history of this church, including some involving homosexuality. Though Rogers is Presbyterian, this issue of homosexuality is relevant to the whole of the Christian church (as Rogers knows), and it would've been better if the book had been presented from a broader Christian perspective.

Lastly, the book doesn't include many dissenting voices. It would've been nice if Rogers could have dug into the other camps' literature a bit more, but given the length of the book this is understandable. He does, however, refer to Gagnon and Hays' works.

In the end, this book is recommended for those interested in this debate. The writing and presentation are clear such that one is able to understand the whats and whys of Rogers' positions. Also, the book is short enough that one can have a decent understanding of how a Christian can welcome homosexuals while (attempting to be/) being faithful to the Biblical witness. It should be noted, though, that the sections pertaining to the Presbyterian Church can be hard to get through for one not too interested in that church's historical disputes.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews











Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
male gender superiority, confessions call sin, homosexual perversion, lesbian people, heterosexual people
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Jesus Christ, General Assembly, Book of Confessions, New Testament, Holy Spirit, Book of Order, Old Testament, United States, Heidelberg Catechism, Scottish Common Sense, Charles Hodge, Fuller Seminary, Westminster Confession of Faith, African Americans, World War, Near Eastern, San Francisco, Supreme Court, Westminster Larger Catechism, Brief Statement of Faith, Civil War, Francis Turretin, Holiness Code, Holy Scripture, Old Princeton
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:




What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums





Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject