Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Jesus Puzzle. Did Christianity Begin with a Mythical Christ? : Challenging the Existence of an Historical Jesus Paperback – October 19, 1999

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
$29.98 $8.33

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Check out The Amazon Book Review, our editors' fresh new blog featuring interviews with authors, book reviews, quirky essays on book trends, and regular columns by our editors. Explore now

Looking for the Audiobook Edition?
Tell us that you'd like this title to be produced as an audiobook, and we'll alert our colleagues at Audible.com. If you are the author or rights holder, let Audible help you produce the audiobook: Learn more at ACX.com.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 390 pages
  • Publisher: Canadian Humanist Pubns; 1st edition (October 19, 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0968601405
  • ISBN-13: 978-0968601402
  • Product Dimensions: 8.4 x 5.4 x 0.6 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (80 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #647,637 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

During three years of exposure on the World Wide Web, where he has presented convincing evidence, on a half a million word website, that no historical Jesus existed, to enthusiastic (and not so enthusiastic) reaction from around the globe, Earl Doherty's first published book has been eagerly awaited. The wait will not disappoint. In a highly attractive product (the cover itself is stunning), the author presents all the details of his argument in an immensely readable and accessible format.

From the Back Cover

Why are the events of the Gospel story, and its central character Jesus of Nazareth, not found in the New Testament epistles? Why does Paul's divine Christ seem to have no connection to the Gospel Jesus, but closely resembles the many pagan savior gods of the time who lived only in myth? Why, given the spread of Christianity across the Roman Empire in the first century, did only one Christian community compose a story of Jesus' life and death-the Gospel of Mark-while every other Gospel simply copied and reworked the first one? Why is every detail in the Gospel story of Jesus' trial and crucifixion drawn from passages in the Old Testament? The answer to these and other questions surrounding the New Testament will come as a shock to those who imagine that the origins of Christianity and the figure of Jesus are securely represented by Christian tradition and the Gospels. With the arrival of the third millennium, the time has come to face the stunning realization that for the last 1900 years, Christianity has revered a founder and icon of the faith who probably never existed.

Customer Reviews

I recommend you first read his book and then visit the site.
Perry Willis
Earl Doherty brutally and methodically eliminates every shred of evidence for the historical Jesus.
Greg Singer
There is a lot of general education material which is great for the average reader.
Bill Paulson

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

571 of 601 people found the following review helpful By Perry Willis on March 25, 2001
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I've read three shelves worth of books on Christian apologetics and the quest for the historical Jesus. I can save you a lot of time. All you really need is this one. The other books raise more questions than they answer, and go off on a lot of wild goose chases. But Doherty's book makes full use of the available evidence, and his thesis actually makes sense.
If you want to read the Christian side (and you should) I recommend "The Case for Christ" by Lee Strobel. Strobel is very selective in his use of evidence, but the book is a good read, and probably the best that can be done for the Christian faith. Read it first if you like, and then read Doherty. There's no comparison.
Doherty also has a web site. I recommend you first read his book and then visit the site. Spend the time to go through everything he presents there - it's well worth it. The site also contains a novel (also titled "The Jesus Puzzle") I thought it was excellent. It deserves to be published. Doherty also provides a lengthy and devastating critique of the Strobel book on his site.
As I read "The Jesus Puzzle" I was surprised at how resistant I was to the thesis that there had been no historical Jesus (I'm not a Christian), but I was impressed at how thoroughly Doherty overwhelmed my resistance. This book deserves the whole world as its audience. Buy it, read it, buy more copies and give them away, spread the word. Nineteen hundred years of misconception has finally been clarified.
21 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
745 of 798 people found the following review helpful By Bill Paulson on February 2, 2000
Format: Paperback
Here's your chance for glory: Produce a good, sound argument that the Jesus Christ featured in the New Testament gospels is the same individual as the Jesus Christ whom the NT epistle authors have in mind. Do this and you will be the first person in history to accomplish this task.
In his book "The Jesus Puzzle", Earl Doherty demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that Jesus Christ is a fictional character. No such person ever existed. The notion may be shocking to the general populace, but it is not a new idea, and has been endorsed by a minority of scholars for over a century.
The best evidence comes from the Christian writers themselves. The New Testament epistles and most of the non-canonical literature until the mid-2nd century show a resounding silence on the earthly life of Jesus. No teachings or miracles. No references to Mary, Joseph, the disciples or the holy places, such as Bethlehem, Nazareth and Calvary. No trial or details of the passion story. And so on.
Scholars try their best to explain this phenomenon, but this degree of silence from so many writers over so many years has one and only one adequate explanation: the writers ignore Jesus's life on earth because they don't KNOW of a life on earth. Jesus Christ started out as an entirely divine being, just like all the other gods in all the other religions of the day. The idea that he lived a full, human life was a later development in Christian mythology which gradually caught on, proved to be popular and eventually became standard orthodox belief.
Another problem with the traditional view of Christian origins is the wide diversity of expressions shown in the early Christian record. These are unlikely to have stemmed from the life of a highly-revered human founder.
Read more ›
34 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
85 of 98 people found the following review helpful By David M. Elder on July 13, 2001
Format: Paperback
-- I won't go into too much about what's good about this book other than to say I think it provides a lot of valid points backed up with sound historical research (at least as far as I can see, not being an expert on the subject). Anyone who has read and moderately studied the Bible and Apocrypha can clearly see how much of the incidents in Jesus's life recall events and lyrical passages from the Old Testament(some word-for-word as in Psalms) and therefore anyone not prone to a 'Magical' view of reality might clearly see Jesus as a mythical figure.

Still, I find some of Doherty's points troublesome to accept and would therefore focus criticism on certain gaps I think need to be addressed in 'The Puzzle', gaps which left me confused and not yet completely convinced. Mainly I have some issues with trying to see how two supposedly distinct traditions, one related to Paul, the other to the Gospels, come together to form a cohesive story like we see in the New Testamant without being directly related.

Briefly, Doherty believes that the historical Jesus was a myth. His theory is largely based on the premise of reversing the precedence of the New Testament texts, making Paul's Epistles come before the Gospels. Instead, the latter 'Q" inspired texts were actually later contrived documents designed to validate a movement Paul was instrumental in spreading.


1. Doherty believes that the Jesus of the Gospels was made up, a myth. If so, then what about Paul, Peter and the other disciples? Were they real or not? And if they were real -- according to Doherty at least Paul and Peter are -- than why not Jesus?
Read more ›
5 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
59 of 67 people found the following review helpful By Richard Taylor on March 13, 2002
Format: Paperback
I notice the reader from Nagasaki, Japan (review Feb 19, 2002) sure makes it sound like Doherty is off in left field. But I don't think so and here's why.
In a nutshell, Doherty believes that the Jesus Christ that Paul believed in is not the same Jesus Christ as portrayed in the Gospels. In Doherty's view, Paul saw Jesus Christ as a purely spiritual being in heaven with God, not a human. The Gospels hadn't been written yet. And when they were written, they were initally only intended to be allegorical.
As an atheist, even I at first thought that Doherty's theory was a "crackpot" theory. "Everybody knows" there was at least some historical figure of Jesus Christ, right? That's what I thought at first, but Doherty makes a credible case for his theory.
Part of Doherty's evidence is the absence of reference to an earthly Jesus Christ in the epistles. I will grant that perhaps evidence of silence isn't by itself completely compelling. But on the other hand, you also have to admit that Paul was teaching about a new religion. Don't people teaching Christianity talk about, well, Christ? Yeah, I think they do.
People say that Paul didn't need to reference the events in the Gospels because "everybody" knew of those events. Did they really? This was a new relgion. Paul cavalierly assumed that everybody knew Jesus had been crucified and rose from the dead?
Also, the reviewer from Japan says that Doherty ignores the vast evidence in favor of Jesus' being the true Messiah. I'm wondering what exactly that vast evidence he is referring to. He seems to say that just reading the Gospels reveals a genuine historical Messiah.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews