Qty:1
$5.32 + Free Shipping
In Stock. Sold by DIY Jewelry Depot

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Jewelry Making: 1x Beading Tweezer, Iron, 9mm wide, 4.6" long(PT001)

5 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

Price: $5.32 & FREE Shipping
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by DIY Jewelry Depot. Gift-wrap available.
$5.32 & FREE Shipping In Stock. Ships from and sold by DIY Jewelry Depot. Gift-wrap available.

Product Information

Shipping Weight 3 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
ASIN B005YVNIVS
Customer Reviews
5 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

5 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #488,053 in arts-crafts
#46,825 in Arts, Crafts & Sewing > Beading & Jewelry Making > Beads & Bead Assortments
#54,397 in Arts, Crafts & Sewing > Beading & Jewelry Making > Beading Supplies

Feedback

Would you like to give feedback on images?
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

Product Description

Iron beading tweezer.Size: 9mm wide, 4.6" longThis kind of beading tweezer is made of iron. It can be used to nip beads or pendants in place of your hand. Easiness and convenience is its advantages. It is also one of tools for jewelry making.

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
This little gadget is a God send! I use it for everything when I am sewing or embroidering. It has helped me with needle threading, pulling pesky caught threads, jump threads to clip, and untangling rats nests under my embroidery projects. It was a very inexpensive item but I have used it numerous times! I very much recommend this product and the folks I bought it from was super quick on the shipping!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Comfortable to grip, fine tips make knot tying easy
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse