| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
25 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Feder is a delight.,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: A Jewish Conservative Looks at Pagan America (Paperback)
This is a marvelous collection of columns and speeches by Jewish conservative Don Feder, on topics from family and feminism to abortion and euthanasia. Worth the price of the book is Feder's speech "Does Judaism Have a Mission to Humanity?" It most certainly does, he argues, and it isn't to bring the message of messianic secularism. The Jews are supposed to serve as a moral example to the rest of the world by observing the specifically Jewish mitzvot and by teaching the laws of the Noahide Covenant to non-Jews."This, ladies and gentlemen," he concludes, "is the essence of the Jewish mission: to persuade humanity that someone indeed is watching us, one to whom we all are ultimately accountable. On the success or failure of this mission the fate of the world hinges." Amen. And all of Feder's writings turn on this mission in one way or another, both in this volume and in his later _Who's Afraid of the Religious Right?_ (and in his regular column, which interested readers will find on the website of the Jewish World Review). Handily smashing the idols of the modern, secularist left, Feder takes no prisoners in his reclamation of the moral high ground for the Judeo-Christian tradition which provides the foundation of United States society and culture -- or did, before that culture was debased and it became necessary to speak, as Feder's title does, of "pagan America." There is a lot at stake here, and Feder knows it. He writes with both passion and wit in expounding a wide range of conservative positions, but at the center is his view of the Jewish mission as outlined above -- a mission he is undoubtedly doing his bit to fulfill. A strong voice in the "culture war," he ranks with Rabbi Daniel Lapin and Dennis Prager in clarity, moral vision, and plain good sense. I don't always agree with him on every single point, but I can't recommend him more highly -- especially to those who have been duped into believing that Judaism is somehow synonymous with left-liberalism. It isn't.
19 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Eloquent Common Sense,
By
This review is from: A Jewish Conservative Looks at Pagan America (Paperback)
It is nothing short of amazing that Don Feder's brain can fit inside his head. His intelligence seems to be comparable to the average think tank. What's more impressive is his ability to employ apropos sarcasm to accentuate his position. And he does it all in a way that makes his column a consistently enjoyable read.This work constitutes a hodgepodge of his efforts with a few speeches thrown in for good measure. As usual, he does not eschew taboo topics. There is a certain irony to his persuasive essay "Returning Christ to Christmas;" in which an orthodox Jew articulates the authentic argument that most Christians are sadly now reluctant to make. Page after page demonstrates Mr. Feder's ability to be sublimely succinct. While nearly any passage could be sited as an inducement to purchase this compilation, a few random examples will suffice. Discussing humanism, he postulates the controversial truth, "without God, morality is impossible; right and wrong become matters of personal preferences." Similarly, on relativism and the widely spoken falsehood that one person's values are as valid as another's, Feder asks, "what makes the Judeo-Christian ethic superior to modern paganism? What makes the volunteer at a drug rehab center better than a schoolyard pusher?...What makes the morality of those who hid Jews during the Holocaust superior to those who killed them?" And to show his astute use of sarcasm regarding obscene rap performers 2 Live Crew, he puts forth "the rap group is to music what toilet-stall graffiti is to literature." These selections are indicative of the wit and wisdom that permeates Don Feder's oeuvre, and this work is typical of his canny reasoning and literary prowess. Although it was initially published in 1993, the anthology has not become dated. Most of the topics he discusses are timeless; the articles' urgency is as relevant today or in certain cases far more so.
11 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Is Feder joking? Is it all a put-on?,
By
This review is from: A Jewish Conservative Looks at Pagan America (Paperback)
"Can an eleven-year old tell the difference?" To quote Feder himself there. Oh, think of the children.
First thing I did when I received the book was read the back. Includes endorsements from Pat Robertson and Oliver L. North. The guy who recently got in some trouble for calling for the assassination of Hugo Chavez, a democratically elected president of a sovereign nation endorses this book. And Oliver North, that other guy who secretly and illegally sold arms to Iran in order to make money to overthrow Daniel Ortega's democratically elected government in Nicaragua. So, this book is endorsed by high-level criminal masterminds and wannabes. But, those are just endorsements the publisher added, not the actual book. I'll still give it a chance. Don Feder opposes the pagans of America. Pagans are essentially defined here to mean all those who aren't Judeo-Christian. Particularly those who are moral-relativists and those with poor work-ethic. These two traits go hand in hand for the pagans apparently. One of Feder's most interesting examples of a pagan is Frank Zappa. Zappa has actually talked about striving to act like a true pagan, so Feder seems to be onto something. Just, apparently, the wrong thing. Zappa was that guy who wrote a lot of really complex and interesting music. Well he didn't just write a lot, he wrote a tremendous amount. Being an employee for Zappa was compared to being in basic training for the Marines. And Zappa was most demanding to himself. So work ethic's apparently not missing in this pagan. And then also every step of the way in Zappa's highly prolific life his resolute ethics was left in his wake. He espoused free-association for all and commonly railed against the situational ethics he saw around him. This is probably why Zappa's music was listened to behind the Iron Curtain. Listened to surrepetitiously by people who saw hope and beauty in Zappa's music when they were under the oppressive control of the Soviets. Lithuania even has a publically-installed bust of him in Vilnius commemorating the joy he brought people of the country. But, as Feder says, he named his daughter Moon Unit, so he doesn't have any credibility. I guess because Moon Unit is a weird name and people who do weird, anti-social things like that just gotta be no good, socially-destructive pagans. Like the Rolling Stones. According to Feder the Rolling Stones made this song called Murder by Numbers which advocates the killing of family members. Oh, but Feder is wrong twice in one sentence. But this is no suprise at this point of the book(about three quarters through). The Police wrote that song. And is doesn't advocate killing family members. It actually expresses the evil of some politicians and how they kill people. But talking about murder and telling stories of murder must be advocating murder I guess is what Feder is saying. Maybe because eleven-year-olds can't tell the difference? Perhaps someone should tell whoever wrote the Old Testament this. Seems to be a lot of murder and sodomy in that thing. Eleven-year-olds might start sodomizing and murdering because of it. The author should probably convert to an Abrahamic religion...but not Islam, maybe just Judaism or Christianity, and then repent for such disregard of the social fabric of America. The most interesting bit of information Feder supplies is a poll. A "1989" poll where something over 60% of people responded that they believe life starts at conception and another something over 60% of those still believe it would be alright to kill that unborn life at the advice of a doctor. But alas, no more information on where this startling poll came from. Does anyone know? There's a lot more of the same. Bizarre characterizations of people, statements of facts I've never heard with no references to check and statements of facts I know to be wrong. The only thing that seriously sticks with me from this book though is him mentioning Frank Zappa. Why can't Feder make something which critiques immorality without being cynical, like Zappa's satires? Zappa questioned moral relativism and the evils and stupidity in society while remaining hopeful and positive. Feder looks at the world and can do nothing but speak cynically and disrepectfully because he's apparently blind to all of the good things that are out there. Two stars for trying to help the world, but only two because Feder should help himself before he tries to help others. Kind of like when the oxygen masks come down when the airplane depressurizes. You put your mask on first, then your kid's. Feder should try to see the good that is right there in front of him before demanding everyone look for it in Judeo-Christianity and nowhere else.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
