Customer Reviews


1 Review
5 star:    (0)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews
Most Helpful First | Newest First

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Why doesn't Jockey show the rear view?, December 30, 2010
I started wearing Jockey for Her when they first came out . . . decades ago. They were the most wonderfully comfortable string-bikinis. The crotch area was wide enough to go from pit-to-pit, and the bikini-string was where all bikinis of that time--between the hip and thigh lumps, right where the thighbone inserts. The backwent straight across, about even with the dimples, at crack-top.

In time, however, they'd change the cut on-whim, and it was difficult to predict what would be the best cut. When the high leg bikinis came in (cut almost to the waist, front and back) they kept the same name "string-bikini" but had a totally different fit and feel.

Decades passed. Now, lowrise is back in style, but their bikinis still rise high in the back.

I love the brand. I love Jockey. But they don't want to reveal how the back is cut, or they would provide photos from different aspects. I can't figure why they want to hide the back!

I keep buying their pants, hoping they'll fit right, but, despite their descriptions, they are cut too high for me and are uncomfortable.

These "string" bikini pants are nice for someone else, but they're still too high-rise for me.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product