Most Helpful Customer Reviews
24 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
It's been done better before, March 29, 2005
This review is from: John Dillinger: The Life and Death of America's First Celebrity Criminal (Hardcover)
While a good, if annoying read (see details below) that narrates the Dillinger story capably, Matera's book is plagued with problems, from it's main thesis to word usage errors. His conclusions are half-right at best -- police were already stocking machine guns and body armor (Dillinger robbed them, remember?), banks were already beefing up security, and SWAT teams were not created until decades later. Dillinger can only be considered "America's first clebrity criminal" by people who have never heard of Jesse James or Al Capone. While he was the most famous outlaw of the era, it was the presence of so many gangs (and the attendant press coverage) that did more for changes in law enforcement and new federal laws covering what had previously been local offenses.
On to real errors. On p. 128 Dillinger meets with a police snitch at 222 State St. (The Loop), then went around the corner to a bar on Lawrence Ave., which is actually 50-plus blocks north of the 200 block of State! Dillinger was not taken by cops on "commercial jets," as they did not exist in 1934. John's niece Mary is described (p. 126) as a student at Bulter U. and later as "an aspiring beauty school grad" (p. 250); Butler is a beauty school?
Finally usage errors here are maddening. John and Pierpont were "trapped by providential thinking." Huh? It's PROVINCIAL! Here's another doozy: "Anna's underhanded activities were particularly cold-blooded in light of her behavior in the proceeding months. It's supposed to be "proceeding" as in coming before July 1934, not "proceeding" (continuing), as John was no longer alive in the proceeding months. And the hot temperature was not the feds' "alley," it was their ally. OK, one more (p. 132): "The police was..." Who let that through?
Too picky? No. Matera should have given his manuscript a cleaner line-by-line scrub before sending it in, and there is no excuse for such sloppy editing from a professional publishing house.
His breezy writing style may work for some readers, but I find his use of modern slang ill-fitting in a story set in the 1930s. In sum Girardin and Hellmer's "Dillinger" and Burrough's "Public Enemies" are much better books on the subject.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Rip Roaring Read, March 25, 2007
This review is from: John Dillinger: The Life and Death of America's First Celebrity Criminal (Hardcover)
"John Dillinger" by Dary Matera proved to be the page-turner I hoped it would be when I purchased it purely on impulse.
Matera gives brief attention to the early life of America's favorite Depression-era desperado, noting the death of his mother when Johnny was a three-year-old and his early forays into small-time crime. Sentenced to a "whopping ten-to-twenty" in the penitentiary for his youthful crimes in 1924, Dillinger spent nine years in the pen before being granted clemency by Indiania Governor Paul V. McNutt in May 1933.
In the fourteen remaining months of his life, Dillinger engaged in a crime spree, robbing banks, raiding police stations for weapons, and staging jail breaks to become America's most colorful prince of thieves and Public Enemy Number One. The narrative is swept along with one shoot-out and getaway after another, and the cast of characters includes all the gangsters I was fascinated with as a boy -- Baby Face Nelson, Pretty Boy Floyd, Homer Van Meter, Alvin Karpis, and a dozen others in Dillinger's changing gang of thugs.
The gun molls play their part and the often-bumbling lawmen, with J. Edgar Hoover at the head of the newly-formed FBI. There was a tender side to Dillinger, shown to his family and girlfriends, his generosity with the needy, and a fierce sense of loyalty to his gang members, for whom he would risk his life to insure their freedom.
Demonstrably well researched, the book has few flaws other than an occasional factual slip-up and a few niggling errors of syntax that annoyed me. But it is definitely a rip roaring read!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
What About Jesse James?, March 26, 2005
This review is from: John Dillinger: The Life and Death of America's First Celebrity Criminal (Hardcover)
This book is definitely worth checking out. After reading it I'm not as impressed as I was at first glance but it's pretty good. There is a great amount of new information here, including some bank jobs heretofore unreported in earlier Dillinger books, and some previously unpublished photos. The research was done mainly by the late Joe Pinkston and his collaborator Tom Smusyn, both wonderful guys and both well known in historical crime circles as the ultimate authorities on America's first Public Enemy Number One, and the book is a rewritten condensation of a 1,000-plus page manuscript completed by Pinkston shortly before his death. I'm glad the book was put out as least a tribute to Joe Pinkston's work but don't especially care for Matera's hipster writing style--this is the first I've ever heard of Dillinger being popularly called "The Jackrabbit"--and a number of factual errors creep into the narrative as well, errors that Pinkston and Smusyn would never have made. I have serious doubts that Matera ever left Arizona while writing this book. Greencastle, Illinois? If Matera can prove Doc Moran's body was pulled off a Canadian lake shore in 1935 I'll eat my hat. The FBI sure didn't know about this even years later and I doubt that it comes from Joe Pinkston either. And the subtitle: "America's First Celebrity Criminal"--has Matera never heard of Al Capone? Or Jesse James? Don't get me wrong. This is a good book and belongs in the library of any Dillingerphile, if only for the impeccable research of Pinkston and Smusyn. But it's not the definitive account it could have been--or should have been.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|