Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle Reading App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
The Amazon Book Review
Check out The Amazon Book Review, our editors' fresh new blog featuring interviews with authors, book reviews, quirky essays on book trends, and regular columns by our editors. Explore now
"Working with a legend like John Huston (Fat City, Judge Roy Bean) was one of the great highlights of my career. Jeffrey Meyers has captured the essence of this extraordinary man, whose appetite for life and art was unparalleled. A must-read for all incurable romantics and lovers of film." --Stacy Keach, legendary Hollywood actor
"A deft study of one of history's finest film masters and greatest egoists. Meyers' masterfully orchestrated journey through Huston's life and work--a constant contest between genius and cruelty--is neither hagiography nor indictment. Meyers presents a portrait of the artist that both seduces and appalls." --Guy Gallo , screenwriter, Under the Volcano
About the Author
Jeffrey Meyers, a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature, has recently been given an Award in Literature by the American Academy of Arts and Letters. Thirty of his books have been translated into fourteen languages and seven alphabets, and published on six continents. He lives in Berkeley, California.
In these times of economic distress is it too much to ask of an author who is a fellow of the Royal Society of Literature and a publisher of Crown's repute to simply proof read a book before printing and selling it? This book is replete with errors of fact and unrewarding critical asides - and I have never run into as many non sequiturs in the course of reading a book as I have done with this one. Where were the editors? The proof readers? Where was the author with a red pencil himself? The sloppiness of the work is one thing - but what makes it sad is that there is so little written word out there about the great John Huston. And Huston deserves much more.
This is not nit-picking. This is holding an esteemed author and an esteemed publishing house to the high standard to which they should and must be held. Especially when their product retails for thirty bucks!
In casting as wide a net as possible in pointing out the factual flaws and weaknesses of personal authorial insight of this book in the limited space available here let me begin with the fact that on page 255 Meyers tells us that after THE MISFITS Montgomery Clift made only more picture - FREUD - before his death. But on page 272 we are informed by the same author that post-FREUD "Clift made only one more movie before dying of a heart attack." A mere 17 pages separate the two assertions. Which one is true? Why didn't the author or his editor or his proof-reader or someone catch this before the manuscript went to irrevocable press? The truth is that Clift made one more film after FREUD - THE DEFECTOR - and died shortly after that film was made.Read more ›
Is this really the first formal, full-length biography to be written (solely) about John Huston, over 20 years after his death? I don't know why it took so long, but despite my misgivings about the result I'm glad that the prolific biographer Jeffrey Meyers has finally filled the gap.
COURAGE AND ART begins oddly, with an entire chapter comparing Huston to Hemingway. This struck me as pointless, but it turned out to be a perfect demonstration of Meyers' technique. Throughout the whole book, whenever Meyers introduces a colleague or friend - be it the jockey Billy Pearson or the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre - he runs through a tedious list of characteristics the person shared with Huston.
Meyers also has an amusing habit of amply quoting his previous biographical subjects, such as Wyndham Lewis, Joseph Conrad, and George Orwell, none of whom ever met Huston or had anything to do with him. Meyers isn't one to waste research.
Even so, the book manages to entertain - how couldn't it? In between films, Huston indulged in painting, boxing, fox hunting, art smuggling, drinking, gambling, and womanizing. He genuinely loved danger and exotic locales. He led a principled stand against McCarthyism. He respected literature. Like many larger than life monsters who are called self-destructive, he enjoyed a very long and fruitful career. He directed his last, first-rate movies (PRIZZI'S HONOR and THE DEAD) from a wheelchair, sucking on oxygen.
I have many more nits to pick about Meyers' plodding manner, but why dwell on the negative? I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from learning more about Huston. This is a responsible, straightforward biography of an important, fascinating artist who led an amazingly adventurous life. If you want to *feel* what it was like to know Huston and fall under his spell, read Peter Viertel's classic roman a clef WHITE HUNTER, BLACK HEART. If you want the facts of Huston's life, COURAGE AND ART will do.
I am currently reading the Huston bio, and Jeffrey Meyers really tries my patience. I have read the Viertel books, and Huston's own autobiography "An Open Book", and most of the books listed in Meyers' bibliography throughout the years. There isn't really a lot that's new here. I especially find Meyers' comments and quotes from his previous writings really irritating. I mean, what does D. H. Lawrence have to do with Huston? That's kinda cheap. And the Hemingway Prologue is 15 pages too long.
Still, I am slogging through it skipping the aforementioned boring parts (and glad I got it from the library instead of paying for it!). If you've never read anything about Huston before, this is as good a book as any. One other thing, is Meyers wearing a fez in his photo?
Was this review helpful to you?
this book. I just never got a handle on it. It is quite tedious. There is a certain casual arrogance that the writer exhibits that runs through the entire book as if his accessment of a certain person or movie etc, is a foregone conclusion. There IS no other. I had a hard time dealing with that. The book isn't a total loss but I think Huston deserves better.
Was this review helpful to you?
Jonathan Yardley, Washingon Post critic, wrote on 17 September 2011:
>>>John Huston "shot forty pictures in forty-six years, between 1941 and 1986," Jeffrey Meyers writes, "and probably made more great films than any other American director." My only complaint about that sentence is: Why "probably"? Huston's first film was an adaptation of Dashiell Hammett's novel "The Maltese Falcon," his last an adaptation of James Joyce's short story "The Dead." Each is a masterpiece, and there are at least five others between them: "The Treasure of the Sierra Madre" (1948), "The Asphalt Jungle" (1950), "The African Queen" (1951), "Fat City" (1972) and "The Man Who Would Be King" (1975).
The list is mine, not Meyers's. He rates "The Man Who Would Be King" a bit lower than I do and "The Misfits" (1961) and "Under the Volcano" (1984) higher. But that is neither here nor there. As a lifelong admirer of Huston's work, I find Meyers's analysis for the most part astute and his evocation of Huston's sprawling, eventful life very much on target. Meyers churns out books, mostly biographies, at a rate that must give pause even to Joyce Carol Oates, and they are uneven at best, but when he is good, he is very good, and "John Huston: Courage and Art" is very good, indeed. Like most of Meyers's other books, it relies heavily on secondary sources, but there is perhaps as much to be said for synthesis as for original research, and Meyers makes the most of the many books and articles to which he has turned.<<<
Huston and his biographer have produced some wild reactions in amazon reviewers, notably about Freud (1962), so I was pleased to find the above critique, which to me takes the right perspective on both men.Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?