John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy Used
+ $3.99 shipping
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by thrift_books
Condition: :
Comment: Ex-Library Book - will contain Library Markings. Book has appearance of light use with no easily noticeable wear. Millions of satisfied customers and climbing. Thriftbooks is the name you can trust, guaranteed. Spend Less. Read More.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster Hardcover – August 1, 2011

See all 5 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
$10.00 $5.35

Best Books of the Month
See the Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Featured American History Books
Learn more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 352 pages
  • Publisher: Skyhorse Publishing (August 1, 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1616082488
  • ISBN-13: 978-1616082482
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 6.4 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (114 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #789,163 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews


How do you defend a madman accused of killing 30 young men and teenagers? That is the powerful theme of this book by a retired judge and criminal attorney whose first case was defending John Wayne Gacy. . . . What emerges is a deep probing into Gacy's mind as it unraveled into a "detached, disconnected" madness wrapped in a maze of sexual confusion and murderous intent. . . . Despite Amirante's hearty defense, Gacy got a death sentence (he was executed in 1994) and his account will illuminate the case for anyone fascinated by the inner workings of a serial killer. 50 b&w illus. -- --Publishers Weekly

"This book, sassy, surreal, and surprisingly personal, is mostly about Gacy's trial and Amirante's observations of his `pathetic and sad' first client. . . .True crime aficionados will want to make a special place on their bookshelves for this unique-slant look at one of America's most notorious killers." --

About the Author

Sam L. Amirante is a retired judge and lawyer. His first case after leaving the Office of the Public Defender was The People of the State of Illinois v. John Wayne Gacy. In 1988, he was appointed to the bench as an Associate Judge of The Circuit Court of Cook County where he served until his retirement in 2005. He is now the principal attorney of the firm of Sam L. Amirante and Associates, P.C. Amirante authored procedures adopted by the Illinois General Assembly such as the Missing Child Act of 1984 (I-SEARCH), which is credited with helping to locate more than 3,000 missing children. Sam lives with his wife and children in Barrington, Illinois.

Danny Broderick founded the firm of The Law Offices of Daniel J. Broderick. During his twenty years of private practice, Mr. Broderick represented thousands of persons charged with felony and misdemeanor crimes. Danny has two sons and lives in Lake Zurich, Illinois.

Customer Reviews

The book is gruesome because the topic is, but it is very well written.
Looks to be a very interesting and informative book and will be asking my sister if I can read it after she finishes it.
The book is told through the words of one of Gacy's attorneys, Sam Amirante.
Bill Emblom

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

27 of 29 people found the following review helpful By RA Meeks on October 12, 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This is the first book I've read on JWG, so I have nothing to compare it with. John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster

My initial hope was that the man who defended Gacy would have insights into the case that I hadn't read about or seen before. What we get, in large measure, is a thorough defense of our judiciary system (even the worst of us is entitled to a defense in court) to recollections of a young lawyer's first case throwing him into the national spotlight. His first case was to defend one of the most savage and remorseless killers of our generation. We learn about the fraternity of lawyers and the back-slapping and glad-handing that makes up the landscape of our legal system.

The best part of this book is the closing arguments which, to their credit, Mr. Amirante and Mr. Broderick, give us practically in toto. The basic questions of JWG's guilt or innocence rests on whether he really knew what he was doing. Both the defense and prosecution give us closing statements addressing those very issues in a thorough and detailed way.

Curiously, most of the pictures in the book are of the crime scene, with a very blurry picture added at the end of the book of the victims. Putting these pics of the victims at the end almost has a last-minute feel to it.

This is really less a profile of Gacy, although some of the documents provided in the book are interesting, and less an overview of the case, than it is about defending the indefensible. If that's your interest, you'll probably enjoy this perspective. Mr. Amirante does not seem to have provided us with any of his inner musings about the case, the kinds of things that would probably keep me up at night.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
24 of 26 people found the following review helpful By Mary on July 4, 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
In so much that this book is a tale of John Wayne Gacy, one of the most notorious serial killers of our time,it is also the story of a young lawyer's quest to uphold and defend the principles of the Constitution of the United States. How fortunate are we to live in a country that even "monsters" such as Gacy are entitled to a dedicated defense as provided by this "young gun"? You gotta love that...and be proud. Did Sam Amirante think Gacy was innocent? Of corse not! But he did believe he was entitled to the best defense he could provide so that even his "rights" could be protected. Amirante and his co-council Bob Motta put their lives on hold for almost a year and a half to immerse themselves in this feat. This is Sam's story. The author Danny Broderick does an excellent job in giving the reader an insight into how Sam Amirante maneuvered this minefield that was the Gacy case. The book takes you on a journey from that first phone call to Sam to the final sentencing of Gacy. A fascinating read. Danny Broderick has you riding "shotgun" on Amirante's incredible ride.
Great Job!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
14 of 16 people found the following review helpful By Vickie R on July 20, 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This book was absolutely fascinating! I was living in the Chicago area when Gacy was arrested and remember all of the media coverage. However, after reading this book, it all seemed much more real. There are so many more facts revealed in this book. I felt as though I was there as the book is so descriptive and well written. Not only did I feel like I was able take take a peek inside the mind of the monster but discovered an understanding of how Sam Amirante, Gacy's defense attorney was able to defend such a disturbed and evil person. You could truly feel the passion of the lawyers involved in this case. I highly recommend this book but clear your schedule because you won't be able to put it down!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful By Eileen Schuh on August 4, 2011
Format: Hardcover
I write crime fiction but I love reading True Crime. Amirante and Broderick's John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster is right up there with Anne Rule's books--in my opinion. Amirante was Gacy's lawyer and tried valiantly but unsuccessfully to mount an insanity defence for his client. While most of us know the story of Gacy's horrendous murdering spree, this book provides more than enough behind-the-scenes information to hold a reader's interest.

While remaining very respectful of both his client and Gacy's victims, Amirante and Broderick masterfully spice the drama with low-key humour--aimed mostly at the lawyer's novice self at the time, and the bizarre circumstances surrounding the case and the trial.

The writing is powerful, clean, and well-paced. It avoids the technical and detailed explanations that often bog down a true crime story and gets right to the interesting part--the people behind the story.

Amirante/Broderick do not avoid casting the villain into the limelight--readers with an avid interest in the criminal mind will come away satisfied that they now know much more about the mind and soul of John Wayne Gacy and the people whose lives he so dramatically touched.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
15 of 20 people found the following review helpful By Sandra L. Rangel on May 22, 2012
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
This is not so much a Gacy story as a "How Great Am I?" story from his attorney. Amirante blows his own horn so much in this book, it is amazing that it is not named "Gacy's Fantastic Attorney". If you are looking for insight on Gacy, this is not the book for you. If you want to know how Gacy acted insane at his trial, then you may enjoy parts of the story. It is really a story about how an attorney got the case dropped in his lap and tried to make the best of the publicity to better his own life (and make money on a book deal). It is obvious that, because he did not get paid much for his work on Gacy's defense, but figured that he would be able to make it up somehow. Most disturbing to me was Amirante's attitude when he discovered that Gacy's house would be razed in the search for more possible victims and to aid in the recovery of bodies. Amirante: What? Search for bodies? No way, I need to try to capitalize on the notoriety and try to make some money off the house. Never mind that there may be more corpses buried under there. Maybe that will make the house worth more and I can sell tours through the house. Yeah, that's a great idea. I can give presentations and talk about my role in the drama. Wait. . . I guess I didn't really didn't know enough about Gacy to give tours. Oh well, I'm sure that I can make a bundle off of it anyway. Bah!
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?