Judaism and the Early Christian Mind: Study of Cyril of Alexandria's Exegesis and Theology (Publications in Religion) [Hardcover]

Robert L. Wilken (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: March 1971 | Series: Publications in Religion

Rare first hardcover edition, 1971.

Product Details

• Hardcover: 271 pages
• Publisher: Yale University Press (March 1971)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0300013833
• ISBN-13: 978-0300013832
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,549,031 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Overview of Early Christianity vrs Judaism, November 7, 2003

By 

H. Campbell (houston, texas) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Judaism and the Early Christian Mind: Study of Cyril of Alexandria's Exegesis and Theology (Publications in Religion) (Hardcover)

Wilken has done an excellent job of describing Cyril's exegetical approach to dealing with fundamental issues that Jews (and pagans) routinely challenged the early Christians with, specifically the usage of the Old Testament by the Church to justify contravening the Mosaic Law. I came away from reading this book with the distinct impression that the early Church had a definite problem convincing the masses that Judaism and Christianity had to be treated as distinct and separate beliefs, and that a certain amount of propaganda as well as intimidation was required to get the message across. While the theologians and exegetes like Cyril were debating the consequences of fitting angels onto pinheads, the people were routinely mixing and matching Jewish and Christian rituals bad doctrines. Little wonder that "heresy" found fertile ground in which to mushroom. Wilken does a good job, if at times repetitively, of describing Jesus' portrayal as The New Adam, the redeemer of Adam's sin, who, as Man and God, was able to defeat death, a feat that Moses, still only a mortal, and the law brought down from Sinai was unable to do. This was the basis of Cyril's refutation of Nestorius, which seems like a bit of an overreaction to what Nestorius really meant.
I would have liked to have seen a bit more discussion of why Cyril was so adamantly anti-Jewish, though from his discussion it's pretty clear that this was partly because Cyril perceived them as "mad" and "blind" for their failutre to accept Jesus. But Cyril's orchestration of the pogrom in Alexandria deserved a bit more exposition vis-a-vis Cyril's ongoing polemical war on Judaism. This is a trifling criticism, though.
A must text for patristic history buffs.