19 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A revisionist view and not very interesting., October 9, 2002
Fuller's account of the Career of Julius Caesar can also be found in Caesar's own commentaries. Some of his insights into Caesar's personality are interesting, but most can be found in classical works by Appian and Dio. His thesis that Caesar was not the great general and statesman that history dipicts him can be disputed. Caesar was the first ancient general to incorporate siegeworks as a tactical tool. Fuller's claim that the roman army was "lucky" that it did not encounter stronger cavalry arms is unfounded. Cavalry in anceint times was not much more than a skirmishing force, not in the same league as the legionares.
I was displeased with the dry, accounts of caesar's campaigns, surprising for a military man like Fuller. Also, he does not go into great detail about Caesar's personality, other than to quote the classical historians.
Overall, a very average work.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A most informative book with a good insight into Caesar., April 17, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: Julius Caesar: Man, Soldier, And Tyrant (Da Capo Paperback) (Paperback)
I found this book most informative and interesting. It has an amazing insight into not only the life of this amazing man but also the times in which he lived. The book effectivly depicts Caesar not only as man but also a good tactitioner and leader. This book has been well researched and writen in an easy to follow way. Although I already know a fair bit about Julius I found that this book informed me on alot of things I previously had no knowledge of. I emensly enjoyed this book and would recomend this book to anyone with a interest in the Ancient Roman Republic and Empire.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
somewhat disappointing glance at a giant, February 14, 2011
This review is from: Julius Caesar: Man, Soldier, And Tyrant (Da Capo Paperback) (Paperback)
Fuller's last book was also his least, in terms of original insight and depth of research. Fuller had written a number of books on military history and biography of military men, even strategic thinking and historical analysis on the First and Second World War; here, the work comes across as somewhat tired and a little cranky.
His general theory is that at times Julius Caesar was not fully responsible for actions he took; that he was exceedingly lucky rather than good; and that towards the end of his life, he may not have been altogether sane. To that end, he starts he biography well, with good political background pre-Gallic conquest, but after this the book drops off. There is nothing in his recounting of the Gallic Wars that is not better brought out by Caesar himself in his own works, and the Civil Wars are better handled ana analyzed by numerous other Roman historians, again including Caesar himself if one reads closely and between some of the lines.
Fuller maintains that Caesar had no real politics of his own; he was simply an opportunist willing grasp at whatever circumstances seemed to offer the quicker route to more and more power. He was neither a military reformer or innovator, and his dismissal of politics per se as an ideology is shown to be shallow or non-existant by his switching allegiances from his natural Optimates status at birth to the Populares and then back again when the proper marriage made that useful. Fuller brings him out not as one of the greatest generals who ever lived - a not uncommon point of view among other biographers and for that matter this reviewer - but as a highly charismatic and brave general but one of otherwise only middling talent, stumling through a charmed career. For example, he faced and eventually beat, over a decade, barbarians such as the Gauls and a few Celtic tribes, but never had to face down a serious and quasi-civilized cavary-based army such as the Parthians fielded; moreover, even in his own legitimate triumphs, there were times of poor judgment (first invasion of Britain, e.g., as well as numerous cases in dealing with the Gauls), and just plain luck.
Instead of being, therefore, THE MAN, he becomes under Fuller he becomes simply the man who happened to be there when Rome reached its final tipping point of the long revolution, where the Senate finally fully lost control of the army to charismatic generals such as Marius, Sulla, etc., and the state itself was finally brought down. Even once the Republic became whatever it was under Caesar's short dictatorship, the tension remained unresolved until a workable solution was finally found, some years later, by Octavian, after yet another destructive civil war, in the founding of the Principate.
As a biography of Caesar, there are much better available; as a book for Fuller aficionados, this is disappointing. It remains worth reading for another view of a controversial figure pivotal to history; but it's not the only book to read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No