Most Helpful Customer Reviews
45 of 46 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Looking Inside the Minds of Megalomaniacs, August 5, 2006
This review is from: June 1941: Hitler and Stalin (Hardcover)
John Lukacs is a fine historian and a fine writer and in JUNE 1941: HITLER AND STALIN he has provided the casual reader with a glimpse into the minds of both Hitler and Stalin as they moved inexorably toward war. This may not be the definitive resource for the researcher, but for the general public this is an excellent summary of the cogent events and personality dances that resulted in Hitler attacking Russia.
Wisely, Lukacs keeps his writing style in the narrative, almost 'novel' manner, a technique that allows the reader to follow an enormous amount of information with complete ease. The focus he has chosen is to describe the events and the effects of those events on both Stalin and Hitler that began as a possible union for world domination but ultimately resulted in fierce hatred and battle between the two countries. Those surrounding the two men (Ribbentrop and Molotov being key players) are examined and their part in the erroneous decision toward war is carefully described. It is a story of power play: Hitler feared England and the United States; Stalin saw the urgency to protect his greed for domination of Europe by siding with Japan. When attempts were miscalculated and the various countries in Europe re-aligned, the Germans invaded Russia with dire consequences.
One of the more satisfying portions of this short book is Lukacs' depiction of how Hitler fell from power while Stalin grew in statesmanship, becoming the awesome force he was at the conclusion of WW II. In his discussion Lukacs unravels the mysteries around the power of Communism in the face of seemingly insurmountable foes. It is alarming food for thought.
For those who wish to understand the steps that lead to WW II this immensely readable book is most helpful. It is a starting point in probing deeper into the sources of megalomaniacal evil that disrupted the globe and nearly decimated Europe. Grady Harp, August 06
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
37 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
"The Duel" an Eastern Front Version, March 29, 2006
This review is from: June 1941: Hitler and Stalin (Hardcover)
In his book "The Duel : The Eighty-Day Struggle Between Churchill and Hitler", historian John Lukacs compared the actions of Adolf Hitler to Winston Churchill during the 80 day period from the ascension of Winston Churchill to the office of Prime Minister on May 10, 1940 until July 30,1940. "The Duel" ends with the decision by Hitler to cease planning for a cross-channel invasion. Instead, Hitler began planning for an invasion of the Soviet Union. Lukacs' new book, "June 1941: Hitler and Stalin" is a rather brief study of the relationship between Stalin and Hitler in the month in which those plans, Operation Barbarossa, achieved fruition.
"June 1941" is not a monumental piece of writing, nor was it meant to be. Rather, as Lukacs notes, it is "less than a monograph but more than a narrative". Lukacs provides the reader with a coherent, concise summary of the events of that month. Lukacs does not inundate the reader with minutiae about the battle plans or the invasion itself. I think it fair to say that Lukacs is more concerned with fleshing out the attitudes of both Stalin and Hitler to the other than to the order of battle. In this, I believe he has done a good job.
In "The Duel" Lukacs indicated that by July, 1940 Hitler felt that a cross-channel invasion was not feasible. Hitler felt that if he could invade and defeat the USSR in a lightning strike that England would be compelled to negotiate an end to the war on terms favorable to Germany. In essence, "June 1941" takes up where "The Duel" left off. Lukacs makes some interesting statements about the nature of Hitler and Stalin's personalities throughout the book. The include Lukacs' belief that Stalin's personality was not that of a dogmatic Marxist but that of a Caucasian chieftain. As such, Stalin had a respect for Hitler's brutal real-politik and this respect colored his thinking and his seemingly irrational belief that Hitler would live up to his promsises.
I did note some direct criticism of other historians that seemed a bit jarring to me, all the more so because they were not really fleshed out but, rather, just left hanging in the air. He describes Alan Bullock's "Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives" as useless and Constantin Pleshakov's "Stalin's Folly" as being "inaccurate throughout". I have read both books and although I am willing to believe that their accounts are subject to dispute as are all historical accounts, I am not sure that unexplained and unexamined criticism such as this is fully warranted.
Depsite the seemingingly unecessary criticism I found "June 1941: Hitler and Stalin" to be a worthy addition to the wealth of material available for people with an interest in this era. Lukacs is an entertaining writer with a solid knowledge of his subject matter. The ability to communicate that knowledge in clear and precise tone is a gift and I have no hesitation in recommending "June 1941" to anyone with an interest in the beginning of one of the most brutal wars the world has ever seen.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Disappointment That Promises More Than It Delivers, August 2, 2006
This review is from: June 1941: Hitler and Stalin (Hardcover)
This is an odd book that promises much more than it delivers, if one believes the editorial comments of such notables as Henry Kissenger, Strobe Talbott or Simon Sebag Montefiore. Despite high praise from those three individuals, "June 1941 Hitler and Stalin" never quite lives up to expectations.
I was somewhat confused as what exactly the author sought to convey to the reader that was new. Yes, Lukacs is a talented and experienced writer and historian. "June 1941" is well written and a good read for those who know little about Hitler, Stalin and events leading to the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941. If this is the intended audience, the book is a useful, though somewhat shallow, primer. Those with a bit more historical knowledge, however, will find very little that is new or truly insightful in this book.
Others will find a great deal that is confusing and contradictory. For example, in the main body Lukacs suggests that, had Stalin not overstepped himself in the Baltics and Eastern Europe, Hitler might not have turned against Russia. Yet at the end of the book, Lukacs notes that an attack by Hitler on the Soviet Union had always been the German leader's intention. There can be little doubt, based on Hitler's own writings in "Mein Kampf" that the latter is true.
Finally, there is the matter of the length of this work. According to Lukacs, "June 1941" is less than a monograph and more than a narrative summary. Indeed, the book is only 145 pages long, not counting appendices and end notes. Perhaps a longer work would have allowed Lukacs to focus more on his very interesting analysis of the relationship between Hitler and Stalin. This would have made the book a much more compelling and historically important work.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|