| ||||||||||||
The Jury is a sobering look at the disarray of the current American jury system. Written in a straight-forward style, filled with ancedotes from the trials discussed, the book ends with a strong prescription for how to change--and save--the jury system in America.
"This is the first book ever that explains how juries work in the real world, and Steve Adler does it in a way that actually makes it fun to read." -- Steven Brill, founder, Court TV and The American Lawyer magazine
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Jury is a great inside look at how juries decide cases.,
By
This review is from: The Jury (Paperback)
Stephen Adler has provided a great inside look at how juries really decide cases. I am a state court trial judge and have an opportunity most people don't get -- talking to jurors after they have decided a case to learn how they came to their decision. Adler has reconstructed the deliberation process in several, varied cases. The descriptions are compelling and surprising, but they certainly lead any reader to a much better understanding of the jury system. Adler also provides a good overview of the possible reform measures that might help -- and a good set of citations for further reference. I submitted these comments because another person had provided a highly critical review of the book. I cannot account for his strong reaction against every facet of the book, from writing style to content. I can say that I highly recommend this book to anyone who cares about our justice system. Steve Leben, District Judge Olathe, Kansas
2 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
The jury is out,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Jury (Paperback)
The Jury: Disorder in the Court by Stephen Adler
Wriiten at a fifth grade reading level, this book reveals the legal system's contempt of juries, the
courts' contempt of ordinary people, and the author's contempt of his readers. This book reveals
the worst aspects of modern journalism: its insipidness, its superificiality, and its addiction to the
trivial. I read so many comments about jurors' dress, make-up, and demeanor that I thought the
the book was written by the fashion editor of Ms. magazine instead of the legal editor of the Wall Street
Journal. The end was the only bright spot of the book, if only because the ordeal was almost
over. Here finally Adler decides to end his blathering about taste and come to a conclusion -- any
conclusion. The most radical change is his proposal to eliminate peremptory challenges of
potential jurors: no more kicking a juror off a panel for no reason at all. As a matter of fact, Adler
would forbid questioning of potential jurors: lawyers will have to settle for juries composed of
average citizens picked at random. He also proposes making jury duty more pleasant in order to
reduce the number of jury-duty shirkers. Again it seems so obvious that any idiot could have
written it, and anyone did.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |