First Sentence:
I want to show that the question with a juridical form "Who is the subject of rights?" is not to be distinguished in the final analysis from the question with a moral form "Who is the subject worthy of esteem and respect?" (I shall distinguish below between these latter two terms.)
Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs):
(learn more)
maximin argument, juridical argumentation, purely procedural conception, juridical plane, deontological point, sacrificial principle, civic city, capable subject, considered convictions, primary social goods, procedural theory, maximin rule, lexical order, complex equality, teleological judgment, cosmopolitan point, capable human being, reflective judgment, strong evaluations, juridical discourse
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs):
(learn more)
Hannah Arendt, New York, John Rawls, Immanuel Kant, Doctrine of Right, Cambridge University Press, Golden Rule, Harvard University Press, French Revolution, Hans Jonas, Mireille Delmas-Marty, Basic Books, Critique of Judgment, Matter of Principle, Michael Walzer, Oxford University Press, Perpetual Peace, The Metaphysics of Morals, Thomas Nagel, Jean-Pierre Dupuy, Kantian Constructivism, Lewis White Beck, Mary Gregor, Moral Theory, Robert Spämann
New!
Books on Related Topics |
Concordance
|
Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover |
Table of Contents |
First Pages |
Index |
Back Cover |
Surprise Me!