6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
There is another side to the Moon!, February 7, 2004
This book is superbly written and well documented. He has a section describing the Changing Character in Crime which just simply will send chills up your spine.
Throughout the book Colson is asking, What is the Remedy? What is Justice? What Must We Do? He does not tip toe around these questions. He presents historical examples and modern statistics and you must decide. I especially liked the Alternative Sentencing section. Not giving the Judges the power to lessen the sentence of a horrific crime but at the same time not overloading the prisons with minor crimes and then be forced to release sentenced criminals by the courts.
He looks at the common sense cost and effectiveness of present sentencing. Towards the end of the book he does point to prison systems that are working. And the stats show the reduction of recidivism as a result of these new faith based prisons.
Personally I do not understand why these newer systems cannot be seen as win-win-win situations. The taxpayer saves money, the prisoner does not return to jail, and society gets a responsible citizen back in society.
I cannot understand a less than excellent review being given by a person that has not served in a prison system. I serve in the Ct. Dept. of Correction and after reading this book not only are my eyes are open to reality but so is my mind. There really needs to be a better way than what we are doing today and I believe that at the very least this book should get the legislatures, wardens and citizens asking, no demanding for positive changes. I would love to see what would be the result if every warden in a state be given this book to study and then to come together with Mr. Colson, The Governor and the Commisioner of Correction.
Mr. Colson needs to write another book in this vein of thought. This book went by way too soon.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Book Review on Justice that Restores from ZiBai Liu, June 22, 2009
Justice That Restores By Charles Colson
A critical book review by ZiBai Liu
Introduction:
Being a Christian with a loving heart and having experienced the criminal justice system in his life, Charles Colson, the founder of the Prison Fellowship Ministries and Prison Fellowship International, examined the criminal justice system in America and studied the reasons of its failure and brought a way out. Different from other writers such as Howard Zehr and Gerry Johnstone who talk about the restorative justice in a more sociological way, Charles gives the present criminal justice system a critique from a biblical worldview. He thinks that the root of its failure is the misunderstanding of the justice which leads to a chaos in society and causes people to loss the moral tradition. Charles believes that there is a redemptive way from the biblical worldview and only this way could bring the society back to order -shalom-- by employing the new criminal justice system---restorative justice.
Summary :
Charles admits that ""the present system falls woefully short", and he thinks the modern worldview is the cause. He urges that we need to re-examine some philosophical questions such as the nature of law, anthropological understanding of human nature and the causes of crime, and then find these answers from the Bible. Charles feels confident on the transforming power of Christ which can restore the current criminal system by introducing a new system called "restorative justice". There are four parts in his argument: creation, the Fall, redemption and restoration.
Part 1: Creation----- "what is justice"
Charles states that society need to have an objective foundation of justice and law to keep people living in order. He found that people have lost the traditional view that God ultimately stood behind the law which provides moral guidance. He believes that a law which only God reveals can provide us true justice. Charles blames the flaws of modern culture which has been profoundly affected by naturalism. He rebukes the naturalism's view on law of nothing but a social construction imposed by those in power to control, and it can lead to tyranny and chaos. He mentions the change of crime conception in King Henry's time from the biblical model of calling for reparation by offender to the victim, to a model requiring a penalty to government. Charles also critiques the relativists who think law is subjective for it can not provide basic standards of justice, and it would lead to chaos in the law.
Part 2: the Fall----"The Roots of Crime"
Charles proclaims that the failed and flawed criminal justice policies are caused by a wrong view of human nature thus lead society in a mess. He thinks authority should understand that its role of using the law to restrain sin is from God, who gives government a task to preserve order by punishing those wrongdoers. (Romans 13:4) Charles discusses the secular views of human nature especially Utopianism which holds that "human beings are by nature purely good--perfectible by education or political change" and it denies the Christian view of original sin. Charles argues that ignoring the original sin would lead to denying moral accountability and personal responsibility. It would dull the conscience and coarsen of crimes. Charles thinks that criminals need to realize the original sin and have a confession and get the salvation and personal transformation.
Part 3: Redemption
Charles emphasizes the original sin which defiles everyone (Romans 3:10) and leads human beings to make wrong moral choices and then commit crime. (Romans 7:15) Charles quotes what Pogo said: "We have met the enemy, and he is us" to affirm that individuals who make wrong moral choices should be responsible for their acts and criminals should not blame the environmental influence. He states that the since law is written on the human heart, so the moral conscience can be trained to acknowledge their own moral failure. Charles argues that the root cause of crime is the deterioration of a society's moral fabric and he found that when moral ethos in society goes up, the crime rate drops. So he suggests that only Christianity can give individuals the true moral training which would lead them make right moral choices and then transform the societies and eradicate the root of crime.
Part 4: Justice That Restores
Charles emphasizes the importance of the love relationship which flows from God to humans and among humans. He states that the restorative justice can offer aspects of the biblical view of shalom which keep people living in the right order that God intended. Charles argues that the restorative justice agrees with the biblical principle in the story of Zacchaeus in Luke 19. Charles appreciates the wise sentencing practice of restorative justice as he quotes Peter Walker's writing: "to view crime primarily in terms of broken relationships between people and only secondly as an offense against soceity's laws gives a radically different perspective on offending and on the punishment of offending behavior." He also mentions the magic moment which is when offender recognizes the harm has been done and repents, and it is the heart of restorative justice to bring reconciliation repairing the relationships among victim, offender and community.
Appraisal:
Having a same view with Gerry that there is a need of the rebirth of ancient practices, Charles rebukes the current criminal justice system which has been badly influenced by wrong philosophies from naturalism and relativism as their understanding of the true meaning of justice has gone far away from the Bible. Marshall also states that God's justice is manifested in the gospel where God's rectifying power accomplishes justice on earth and God justifies the one who has faith in Jesus. Similar to what Marshall thinks that justification is "primarily a legal concept" which reflects the legal status of a person before God , Charles emphasizes that the true just social order only comes from God and the law should reflect God's objective truth which is the foundation of justice. Charles realizes the neglecting of this connection between God's law and social law is the problem of present criminal justice system, and it agrees with what Marshall points out that there is a divorce between the doctrine of justification and issue of social justice.
As Marshall states that "justification has been confined to the religious sphere of thought", and few people can sense the relationship between the justice from God and issues of social justice , Charles brings a way of relating these two issues very well.
Zehr who has fame of "grandfather of restorative justice" addresses the core of restorative justice is to put right the wrongs, and it implies reparation or restoration of harms offenders have caused. Johnstone summarizes that instead of only punishing offenders, "restorative justice helps to heal the wounds of crime suffered by the victim". Instead of understanding restorative justice only from sociological and sociopolitical point of view like Howard Zehr and Gerry Johnstone, Charles gives the restorative justice a biblical explanation. He understands that the heart of the restorative justice is the point of transformation which is human heart's changing. Charles focuses on the redemptive power and true forgiveness of sin as well as community transformation on his understanding of restorative justice. He thinks the restorative justice grounds in the peace of God's created order, which offers aspects of the biblical view of shalom.
Agreeing with Peter Walker that we should "view crime primarily in terms of broken relationships between people" , Charles argues the reason why justice is not realized is because individual responsibility in the context of community, individual transformation and healing of relationships in neglected. He mentions that there is a spiritual moment---magic moment---when offenders realize their responsibility for their crime, and are transformed to be willing to restore the relationships between people and also between God, which Charles thinks is the central goal of criminal justice system.
In concurrence with Johnstone's idea that community must be prepared to become involved in the resolution of conflicts between offenders and victims, Charles argues that restorative justice must provide opportunity for offenders to be reintegrated into community. He thinks when community court offers initiative help such as job training, restitution program to offenders can reinforce the notion of individual responsibility and reduce recidivism, thus "individuals and cultures can be redeemed, and community's peace can be restored."
Johnstone emphasizes the on going relationship with offenders which means we should not simply cut them off as enemies. Charles takes the same stand and advocates prevention programs such as the Choice program to help troubles kids stay with their families, and MatchPoint program which sends Christians mentors to have a long-term relationship with offenders to demonstrate the unconditional love of Jesus Christ. It is like what Michael wrote: "we are not looking back to punish the past, we are trying to create the future....to recreate harmony and to re-member."
Critique:
Charles' understanding of the environment's influence on crime seems a bit vague to me. In one way, Charles agrees with psychologists Samenow and Yochelson and Harvard professors James Q. Wilson's study result which shows crime has no correlation with environment, poverty, race, or oppression but with moral training. He believes the reason for committing crime is only because human beings make wrong moral choices. But in...
Read more ›
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No