| |||||||||||||||
"As the United States plays out decisions that determine how its public lands will be managed, this book offers an invaluable overview, insight, and perspective." - Tim Clark, coeditor of Foundations of Natural Resources Policy and Management
"Keiter does a masterful and readable job on the conservation/resource wars in the recent American West. All those with a stake in the New West should read this book to see how 'collaborative process' does and doesn't work." - John Gordon, Yale University
"Keiter draws on literature from ecology, history, law, political science, and economics to forge the thesis that the age of ecology is upon us. His examination of the whole range of public land issues ensures that anyone interested in public lands policy will enjoy his book, which offers an original synthesis of science, law, and policy debates. A work of striking originality." - Robert Glennon, University of Arizona
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A case for local ecosystem collaboration,
By
This review is from: Keeping Faith with Nature: Ecosystems, Democracy, and America's Public Lands (Hardcover)
In this book, Robert Keiter reviews an extensive literature on ecosystem management in the United States, especially when ecosystems cross management or political boundaries. It's not obvious from the beginning, but he wants to make the case for a new approach to these transboundary problems - - an approach that reduces the role of federal agencies and increases the role of local citizens.Keiter makes his argument through a series of case studies, too many to list here. The more famous cases include Yellowstone wolf reintroduction, the Northern spotted owl controversy, and wilderness designation in southern Utah. As background material, these cases are very good, and fairly thorough. Keiter's desire to tell the whole story in each case does mean that he gets distracted from the main line of his argument - - he'd rather relate additional details or discuss an important issue for the understanding of the individual case than trim the story down to the essentials. This makes the book longer than it need be for the overall argument, but useful as a reference for the cases. Whether he made the right choice or not depends on what you want out of the book. The final prat of the book makes an argument for local collaboration as alternative to federal regulation. Keiter gives special attention to the work of the Quincy Library Group in the Sierra Nevada. The Quincy process includes environmentalists, extractive industries, recreationists and others in the community who try to reach a consensus on how to manage local public lands. Keiter uses that case to illuminate the political and legal challenges of ecosystem management in light of the political and legal framework that he discussed in earlier chapters. Though he recognizes its limitations and legal challenges, Keiter views this local collaboration as a more authentic, participatory form of democracy and thus a better way to manage ecosystems on public lands. Clearly, these local processes can have the advantage of bringing in private land managers, though California's largest landowner (Sierra Pacific Industries) excludes its own lands from the Quincy Library Group discussions. My larger concern is that these local collaborations are only participatory for those who live locally. Those of us who visit public lands at a distance from our homes are excluded from the process. As a result, local economic interests will always receive greater weight in these collaborations than will wilderness designations, endangered species, and other national concerns. Keiter realizes this, but when the chips are down he sides with local participation over national environmental concerns. That's a defensible choice but will leave all of these collaborations open to lawsuits by national groups. Whether you agree with him or not, Keiter has made a serious case here, and much of the background material is interesting for its own sake. I think it's longer than it needs to be, but the length does make the book a good source for its many case studies.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|