Ken Burns: The Central Park Five 2013 NR CC

Amazon Instant Video

Available on Prime
(277) IMDb 7.7/10
Watch Trailer

In 1989, five black and Latino teenagers from Harlem were arrested and later convicted of raping a white woman in New York City's Central Park. The Central Park Five tells the story of that horrific crime, the rush to judgment by the police, a media clamoring for sensational stories and an outraged public, and the five lives upended by this miscarriage of justice.

Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson
1 hour, 59 minutes

Available to watch on supported devices.

Product Details

Genres Documentary
Director Ken Burns, Sarah Burns, David McMahon
Starring Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson
Supporting actors Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, Kharey Wise, Matias Reyes, Jim Dwyer, Angela Black, Ed Koch, Craig Steven Wilder, LynNell Hancock, Calvin O. Butts III, Raymond Santana Sr., Natalie Byfield, Michael Warren, Saul Kassin, Michael Joseph, David Dinkins, Ronald Gold, Humberto Arroyo
Studio Not Specified
MPAA rating NR (Not Rated)
Captions and subtitles English Details
Purchase rights Stream instantly and download to 2 locations Details
Format Amazon Instant Video (streaming online video and digital download)

Customer Reviews

The question really is, how often does this happen and nobody knows about it?
Ashani C. Motisola
This was such a disturbing tale that really needed to be told, and it was presented in such an objective point of view in my opinion.
Michele Shaw
The film does a good job depicting the stories of each of the accused young men who were jailed for a crime they didn't commit.
Meg E. Lewis

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

62 of 72 people found the following review helpful By Paul Allaer TOP 100 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on January 21, 2013
Format: DVD
In late 2011, Sarah Burns published the "Central Park Five" book, and in late, 2012, the documentary based on this book, or perhaps more accurately stated, made in conjunction with this book, was released in the theatre (I saw it at the Landmark E Street Cinema in Washington DC about a month ago). This co-documentary is directed by the book's author as well as David McMahon and Ken Burns (yes, that Ken Burns).

"The Central Park Five" (120 min.) brings in excruciating (but riveting and enraging) details the background of the infamous "Central Park jogger" case of a woman who was savagely attacked, raped and left for dead while jogging in New York's Central Park in 1989. By coincidence that very same evening a bunch of black and latino 14 and 15 yr. old teenagers were hanging out in Central Park and pretty quickly the New York police rounded up a number of them, eventually causing 5 of them to admit to a crime they did not commit. This of course then goes to the very heart of this documentary: why did the 5 innocent teenagers confess to a crime they did not commit? Just watch!

Several comments: first and foremost, this documentary is clearly the result of painstaking background work into the details of the case. The initial part of the documentary does a great job setting the table of what New York was like in the late 80s (pre-law and order days of Rudolph Giuliani's administration in the 90s). The documentary also gives some amazing insights on why the media were not more thorough and critical while covering the case and the trial (one of the interviewees is a New York Times reporter who basically admits that 'we failed to do our job').
Read more ›
6 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
65 of 89 people found the following review helpful By richard l grant III on February 7, 2013
Format: DVD Verified Purchase
My initial reaction to reading the Turfseer review of this film was a belief, based on the errors and the distortion of facts in the review,that the reviewer saw a different film from the one I saw or was merely ignorant of the truth because he didn't understand the film.. A closer reading leads me to believe that something more serious, perhaps even sinister, is afoot here: a deliberate attempt to mislead those without direct unbiased knowledge of the events discussed in the film, and to advance the unsupported theories and suppositions of some of those directly involved in the original miscarriage of justice.

To wit: Turfseer writes ( I shall hereafter include Turfseer's accounts in quotes and my answers below them):

"the Central Park Five (CPF) were not only convicted of rape (in most cases) but also assaulting other people in the park that night. Burns and the CPF want you to believe that they merely observed two serious assaults in the park and acted 'shocked' by the brutality of the mob."

They were NOT convicted of assaulting specific "other people", because, as the prosecutor, Elizabeth Lederer, admitted in her own opening statement to the jury in the initial trials, none of the "other" people assaulted in the park could identify their assailants among the five accused teenagers (let Truthseekers as opposed to Turfseers consult the film and public records to back up the assertions I make here) and that the only witnesses against them were their proximity, i.e. being in the park at the same time, and their own confessions which they asserted had been coerced and tricked out of them, and which they had by the time of the trial repudiated.
Read more ›
6 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
31 of 43 people found the following review helpful By Jeremy Crowhurst on April 29, 2013
Format: DVD
There is clearly no question that a grave injustice took place in this case, and the film is (like all of Ken Burns' works) compelling watching. But the producers overplayed their hand here, and the result is a movie that on a close analysis -- just from its own content, without doing any external research about the case -- overstates the case to the point of misrepresenting what exactly happened.

There is a general principle in journalism that you make the strongest argument you can, and if somebody says something, the viewer/reader can infer that nothing stronger could have been said. An easy example is, "The Yankees have lost 13 of their last 15 games." When you read that, you know two things: they lost 13 of their last 15 games, and 16 games ago, they won. Otherwise, the story would have been that they lost 14 of their last 16 games.

This principle compels certain inferences that seriously undermine the overall message of the movie. In fairness, sort of, the producers often include the information that shows "the rest of the story", but generally it goes so fast that if you blink, you miss it.

First of all, there was no "Central Park Five". Initially it was something like the Central Park 30. Then when it came to seeking indictments it was something like the Central Park 12. Then when it came to actually going to trial, it was the Central Park Eight. Three were allowed to plead guilty to offences other than the attack on the jogger. This all comes at the endnotes to the movie, which all tend to contradict the entire premise of the movie: they picked these five innocent kids, and went all-out to convict them, regardless of the truth. Well, no.
Read more ›
8 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews