8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good history of a turning point in the Viet Nam war era., April 21, 1999
By A Customer
This book paints a portrait of the Kent State campus at the time of the shootings in May 1970. Tom Bates' book Rads is a good companion volume, which describes the Madison bombing which occurred three months later. Either book describes how irresponsible activism and reaction led to senseless violence and innocent people getting killed or wounded. Michener clearly chose sides when writing his account, but he gives a pretty complete picture of what happened, when, where and why. Some details of the National Guard's conduct were not available to him when he wrote the book. The Kent State incident was one of the turning points for the public perception of the war and of and for those who opposed it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
"Four Dead in Ohio" was better!, October 10, 1999
I enjoyed Michener's narrative. However, it was written so soon after the tragedy that it does not adequately cover the totality of the event or put it in a historical perspective. Also, he treats the early investigations inconsequentially. I do not understand how the Scranton Commission could conclude that the shootings were "unnecessary, unwarranted and inexcusable." Yet, Michener had a tendency to rationalize and find excuses for the conduct of the National Guard. He was much too forgiving.
I have read several of the major books on Kent State and I think that William A. Gordon's "Four Dead in Ohio" is the most comprehensive and rewarding. Gordon provides perspective and logical arguments, even if some of the questions cannot be completely answered.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A balanced account, wriiten at the time., June 26, 2006
I just finished this book, and I don't know what book some of the other reviewers on this page were reading, but Michener certainly doesn't exonerate the National Guard, as Ohio law did, nor does he make a case for or against the war in Vietnam, other than to quote those who do (or don't). His negative stance on the radical SDS is based on the actions of the organization itself, which at its best was irresponsible, at its worst was criminal.
This book was fascinating. How Michener and his staff managed to do such detailed and intricate research, and compose and have published a 500-page book barely a year after the event, is nothing short of incredible. It's only drawback, as others have mentioned, is that it was written so close to the incident that there is no real "distance" perspective, and it made me want to read more current books on the subject.
I was six years old when the Kent State incident occured. I always knew of it, of course, but knew only the barest details. I'm a conservative guy, and I have nothing but the utmost respect and admiration for the brave men and women in the military, especially those in harm's way defending OUR freedoms. But after reading this book, even I was saying, "why did these guys open fire?" There certainly didn't seem to be any need to. Some students were throwing rocks and tear-gas cannisters back at the Guard, but most evidence shows that they weren't any closer than 40 or 50 yards away at the most. I concluded (as does Michener) that those who fired into the crowd were mostly scared, poorly trained kids, most that had never seen any kind of combat, and that thought they were in more danger than they actually were. Some Guardsmen in the book are quoted as saying that they were firing at a particular student who was about to throw something at them, and Michener leaves the decision about whether to believe them up to the reader. In any event, this was an absolutely tragic mistake, and four people died because of it, and this should never have happened.
Of course, there are factions in this country that will disparage and dismiss any article, book, or similar publication that concludes anything but that the Ohio National Guard were cold-blooded killers, or that the students on the campus that day were anything but flower-toting, non-violent, peace-loving angels. If you are intelligent enough to see past these easy generalizations, then read this book. It will not disappoint.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No