16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Widely considered Kepler's definitive biography, December 19, 2000
This review is from: Kepler (Dover Books on Astronomy) (Paperback)
Although written in 1948, Caspar's biography is today still the most comprehensive attempt to portray the person of Kepler in a unified manner. This work reflects Caspar's lifetime of work dedicated to Kepler's many publications, manuscripts, and correspondences, and, thanks to additional citations made by editor Owen Gingerich, the reader may now find where nearly all of these passages derive from. Both the common reader and serious student may benefit from this book, for it combines Kepler's scientific studies with the deeply personal conflicts of an early modern genius. Caspar's biography is fundamental not only for studies made on Kepler, but also for the Scientific Revolution in general.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Quite good, February 1, 2009
This review is from: Kepler (Dover Books on Astronomy) (Paperback)
This biography is fine, but it cannot be recommended above Koestler's biography, which is more beautifully written and, I think, not as scholarly inferior as some people say. The discrepancy in terms of style seems to be due in part to this translation being rather clumsy (although I have not compared it with the German original). Let us consider some comparisons between this book and Koestler's in this regard. Where Koestler has (quoting Kepler) "geometry was implanted into man ... and not merely conveyed to his mind through the eyes" (p. 262), Caspar reads: "geometry ... has been transferred to man ... [and] not received inside through the eyes" (p. 381). Or (again quoting Kepler): "be greeted, double knob, children of Mars" (Caspar, p. 201) versus "hail, burning twin, offspring of Mars" (Koestler, p. 377).
Now it may be said that Koestler operates with a poetic licence (which is probably true in the latter case, but often not), but so should this book, which is also a popular account with no footnotes or references. No footnotes or references, that is, except those added by the translator/editor. And in these she reveals her appalling lack of taste. She is extremely inconsistent in what gets a footnote and what does not, which seems to be due, firstly, to the fact that she does not know the material very well, and, secondly, to the fact that she shamelessly wants to refer to her own work whenever possible. And she completely destroys the flair of Caspar's stylish sentence "[Kepler] did not start with doubt, as another soon did, but with an unquestioned faith in ratio" (p. 377) by inserting a dimwitted attempt at a joke: "Ed. note: Doubtless, reference here is to Descartes (1596-1650)."
Quibbles aside, this is of course still a very interesting book. Here are some of my favourite themes:
"Aesthetic-artistic consideration of the universe" (p. 382). "I consider it my duty and task ... to advocate ... what I ... have recognized as true and whose beauty fills me with unbelievable rapture on contemplation." (Kepler, p. 298). "I may say with truth that whenever I consider in my thoughts the beautiful order, how one thing issues out of and is derived from another, then it is as though I had read a divine text, written onto the world itself ... saying: Man, stretch thy reason hither, so that thou mayest comprehend these things" (p. 152).
Mathematics a means to this end. "Kepler consciously renounced [Archimedean] rigor and wanted to take over from Archimedes only so much as 'is sufficient for the pleasure of the lovers of geometry.'" (p. 234). "Don't sentence me completely to the treadmill of mathematical calculations and leave me time for philosophical speculations, which are my sole delight. Each one has his own particular pleasure, one the tables and nativities, I the flower of astronomy, the artistic structure of the motions." (Kepler, p. 308).
Man's cognitive abilities designed for this purpose. "[T]he world partakes of quantity and the mind of man grasps nothing better than quantities for the recognition of which he was obviously created." (p. 96). "Nature loves these relationships in everything that is capable of thus being related. They are also loved by the intellect of man who is an image of the Creator." (p. 94). Cf. also p. 93 and above.
The universe designed for this purpose. "The earth's axis in inclined to the ecliptic in consideration of the people distributed over the whole surface of the earth, so that the change of the heavenly phenomena should extend to all places on the earth and consequently all people have a share in it. ... Sun and moon have the same apparent sizes, so that the eclipses, one of the spectacles arranged by the Creator for instructing observing creatures in the orbital relations of the sun and the moon, can occur. The earth moves around the sun to make it possible for man to get to know the world and its dimensions." (p. 296).
Reception of the above. These ideas were quite well received e.g. in the case of the Mysterium Cosmographicum: "Professor Georg Limnäus in Jena ... is ecstatic that at last someone had again revived the time-honoured Platonic art of philosophising. ... [Tycho Brahe] takes unusual pleasure in the book: ... the zeal, the fine understanding and acumen ought to be praised [even though] certain details give him pause." (p. 69-70). It was different with the more modern physics of the Astronomia Nova: "Kepler ran up against rejection and lack of understanding on all sides. Maestlin, Fabricius, Longomontanus and others shook their heads." (p. 135).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No