Customer Reviews


3 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Kidde Photoelectric Smoke Alarm # PE9
Amazon and Vendor;
The vendor that sells these types of items should list the factory marked "unit experation date" in there description. This unit was some 2 years old when I received it, which shortens the useable life to the purchaser. If a vendor does not list this date they are just not being completely honest with the customer! All smoke and carbon...
Published on July 4, 2009 by Roger L. Mendenhall

versus
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Harder to install than First Alert
I bought a photoelectric smoke detector (ie, no radioactive material) because I didn't want to worry about the disposal issue in 10 years when an ionizing model would need to be replaced. I bought the Kidde because it's thinner than the comparable First Alert one.
Having now done the installation, I'm regretting my choice. Check out the installation instructions:...
Published on March 3, 2005 by A. Watkins


Most Helpful First | Newest First

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Kidde Photoelectric Smoke Alarm # PE9, July 4, 2009
This review is from: Kidde PE9 Battery-Operated Photoelectric Sensor Smoke Alarm (Tools & Hardware)
Amazon and Vendor;
The vendor that sells these types of items should list the factory marked "unit experation date" in there description. This unit was some 2 years old when I received it, which shortens the useable life to the purchaser. If a vendor does not list this date they are just not being completely honest with the customer! All smoke and carbon monoxide alarms have these dates clearly marked on them. Look for this date before you buy.
Roger M
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


6 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Harder to install than First Alert, March 3, 2005
By 
A. Watkins "quiet-please" (Durham, NC United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
I bought a photoelectric smoke detector (ie, no radioactive material) because I didn't want to worry about the disposal issue in 10 years when an ionizing model would need to be replaced. I bought the Kidde because it's thinner than the comparable First Alert one.
Having now done the installation, I'm regretting my choice. Check out the installation instructions: http://www.kiddeus.com/ManualPE9en.rsf
The strong visual lines of the smoke detector housing means you have to install it *exactly* parallel to the walls or else it will be visually distracting (ie blowing the reason I went with the Kidde in the first place). To make matters worse the Kidde mounting plate has 2 holes for the mounting holes -- as opposed to slots which allow some re-alignment after you've put holes in your ceiling.
Even though First Alerts comparable model hangs down from the ceiling more and has an odd bulbuous shape, I think its ease of installation and extra features (hush button, battery drawer) make it a better choice.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars False Alarms, January 1, 2009
This review is from: Kidde PE9 Battery-Operated Photoelectric Sensor Smoke Alarm (Tools & Hardware)
I bought this alarm a couple years back and it worked fine, until now. We were eating dinner and bam, the alarm goes off. No big deal, maybe we burned some toast. I take it off, and later that night it goes off again. I bring another detector to see if there really is smoke, nothing. Now it goes off no matter where I am, just seconds after I install the battery. The thing is worthless, and all it did was hang on the wall for 2 years. I would NOT buy this again.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product