| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
23 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A disappointing finish,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Killing of Robert F. Kennedy: An Investigation of Motive, Means, and Opportunity (Hardcover)
This book begins as a fascinating saga of a rational man dedicated to determining the truth of Robert F. Kennedy's assassination. It develops into a real-life detective thriller, posing many provocative questions that challenge the official theory that Sirhan Sirhan acted alone.Then, inexiplicably and incredibly, the author finishes his account with an assertion that Sirhan DID act alone, based only on his 3rd conversation with Sirhan, who evidently is no role-model for sound-mindedness. Mr. Moldea appears to just "give up" at this point, and offers only vague "explanations" as to why he resigns himself to Sirhan's complete responsibility for the assassination. What haunts the reader here is that the author's formerly penetrating, precise methodolgy DISAPPEARS, and we are abandoned to an implausible dismissal of the woman in the polka-dot dress and her companion (Mr. Moldea now asserts that he doesn't believe any of that now, though he certainly made a convincing case earlier in this book). Mr. Moldea then offers an embarrassingly weak theory of how Sirhan could have gotten to within 2 inches of RFK, after virtually proving -earlier in this book- that this was impossible!. Finally, the author too easily absolves Thane Eugene Cesar complicity in RFK's murder, largely on the basis of a polygraph (so-called "lie detector") examination, administered many years after the event. Polygraph "tests" are hardly reliable, as their inadmissability in court demonstrates. Mr. Moldea's entire book COLLAPSES as he contradicts himself on the "more than 8 bullets" evidence and other previously-presented indications of others' involvement in the assassination. I read this volume late into the night, only to be profoundly disappointed by the author's sudden change of character. His almost bizarre, bland ending must be the reason that this hardcover book is now available on bargain shelves for around $4.00. Readers desiring a sincere effort to investigate RFK's tragic death will need to consult other authors than Dan E. Moldea!
30 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Wasted Time,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Killing of Robert F. Kennedy: An Investigation of Motive, Means, and Opportunity (Paperback)
Moldea writes 304 pages explaining the problems such as coroners finding that RFK was shot from the right rear, more shots fired than Sirhan's gun held, etc., etc.Then in the last chapter he concludes that Sirhan acted alone and fired the shots that killed RFK. He doesn't give any new evidence to support this claim. Oh, he charges the LAPD with botching every aspect of the case but says they got it right for the wrong reasons. Don't waste your time on this book. If you support the original findings you won't like the charges of incompetence. If you are looking for a book to support a second gunman theory this isn't it.
21 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Somewhat Disappointing,
By
This review is from: The Killing of Robert F. Kennedy: An Investigation of Motive, Means, and Opportunity (Paperback)
My first adventure in investigative journalism, I was immediately captivated by the beginning: cast of characters, general overviews, and the excitement that, based on the overview of how the book was to go, it was worth reading. The material was well written in that Mr. Moldea went into fine and captivating detail asto what the investigators were thinking, what EVERYONE was thinking. I was a little suspicious of the passage where he describes visiting with Sirhan Sirhan, and given the result of the encounter, maybe made the author a little biased asto how his investigation would lead to. The ending left me in a completely different place, where I believe the author's evidence lead me to. His conclusions were not anything I had agreed with. I feel he made the evidence ultimately fit the official version of the tragic downfall of RFK that fateful June evening in 1968.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|