Qty:1
  • List Price: $17.00
  • Save: $1.93 (11%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: While this book has been loved by someone else, they left it in great condition. Hurry and buy it before someone else does and take advantage of our FREE Super Saver Shipping!!!
Add to Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

King Arthur Paperback – January 4, 1989


See all 8 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback, January 4, 1989
$15.07
$1.95 $0.01
Unknown Binding
"Please retry"

Frequently Bought Together

King Arthur + Merlin
Price for both: $30.86

One of these items ships sooner than the other.

Buy the selected items together
  • Merlin $15.79

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Hero Quick Promo
Browse in Books with Buzz and explore more details on the current pick, "The Mockingbird Next Door: Life with Harper Lee" by Marja Mills.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 416 pages
  • Publisher: Harper Perennial; Reprint edition (January 4, 1989)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0060971827
  • ISBN-13: 978-0060971823
  • Product Dimensions: 1 x 5.2 x 7.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 15.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 2.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (27 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #484,694 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Library Journal

Though Goodrich asserts that hers "is the first book to have explored very minutely and in the original languages both the historical and literary material concerning King Arthur," numerous Arthurian scholars have written similarly researched books with similar conclusions. Goodrich assumes ancient authors were accurate, and she has made the following findings: the real Arthur operated "between what is now Scotland and what is now England," rather than in the South; he died near Douglas; and Avalon was St. Patrick's Isle, near Man. Her romantic sensibilities skate over the treacherous evidence and find geographic certainties everywhere. Despite these drawbacks, this is enjoyable reading for the public library patron interested in King Arthur. Don Fry, Poynter Inst. for Media Studies, St. Petersburg, Fla.
Copyright 1986 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

About the Author

Norma Lorre Goodrich, Ph.D., K.C., FSA Scot, has been teaching for forty-five years and is a professor emeritus at the Claremont Colleges. She is the author of King Arthur, Guinevere, Merlin, Heroines, Priestesses, Ancient Myths, and Medieval Myths. She lives in Claremont, California, with her husband.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

There is research in her books as well as story.
Barbra L. Moran
One very disturbing thing is that for this book to be so popular, many readers must feel that they can follow and evaluate its argument.
moose/squirrel
If not,it wouldn't be a good idea to start with this.
truthreader

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

25 of 30 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on September 20, 1999
Format: Paperback
For years, Norma Lorre Goodrich has tried to fleece an unsuspecting public with her absurd works of Arthurian pseudo-scholarship. Hundreds of books, articles, and conference presentations annually address the question of King Arthur; not all of them are wonderful, but among them are some real gems. However, since they're aimed at a scholarly audience, the public doesn't generally know about them, and Goodrich, realizing she can profit from the gullibility of people curious about King Arthur, comes along with her ersatz academic moonshine and nets lucrative book contracts.
Goodrich's most alarming fault is that she takes literature as history, leading to chapter after chapter of fiction, speculation, and wild conjecture. Goodrich's books are NOT the honest investigations of a scholar, and I urge people interested in King Arthur to talk to their English or history professors and discover books by historians, archaeologists, and literary historians who pursue the truth with objectivity and honesty.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
24 of 29 people found the following review helpful By Nelson R. Willis on October 11, 1998
Format: Paperback
I'm not sure if this book even merits one star, but it was the lowest rating allowed by Amazon's format. Take it from a guy who has been studying this subject for years: this is probably the very worst book you can find on this subject. I am encouraged by the fact that some people recognize this, but I am equally dismayed that many people have been fooled into thinking that this and Goodrich's related books are good scholarship. While Goodrich may be highly intelligent and educated, she appears also to be out of touch with reality. I am not saying this to be mean or spiteful! That is simply my impression from watching her irresponsibly butcher and rewrite history with shameless abandon. There is a tenet which says that the most reliable interpretation of the evidence will almost always be the simplest, and this is the problem I have with Goodrich; her theories (which are really assumptions and presumptions) are so wacky and overly complicated that they appear to be the product of a mind which has blurred the line between history and fiction. She goes on and on and on and on, writing as if in a manic state, giving little clue as to where she's comming from or where she's going with her tedious, blow-by-blow analyses of medieval romances, which she then tries to pass off as scholarly proofs of her rediculous ideas. If that were not enough of a crime against historical scholarship, she then proceeds in her bibliography to viciously slander great scholars (such as Leslie Alcock and Geoffrey Ashe, whose books I've reviewed as well) and their excellent, ground-breaking research.Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful By truthreader on February 5, 2009
Format: Paperback
I seem to one of the few reviewers that see this book in more than one way. I originally read this when it was first published and though I realise it is somewhat haphazard in its presentation and divurges too often on its subject matter. Also is sometimes doubtful in its conjectures and inaccurate and the editing process used is very unorthodox,(to say the least),there is merit in the depth of her research and fresh idealism. The overt feminism at times and some of her theories are rather debatable though. For example-the gaelic and pict ideas and tendencies to believe wholeheartedly the 'clues' of medieval romance writers like about the doves and comb concerning Guinivere appear overdone and gullible. Nevertheless, the possibility that Geoffrey wasn't always wrong or lying and the consideration of the in-depth Northern hypothesis is interesting and led me to further reseach of my own. Unfortunately, many writers cloak their pet theories in factual attire and need to keep some perspective in scholarship more evident. I am sure that is one reason she is so harshly criticized. There has been much research and writing done since this time and more theories and evidence have been put forward, so to sum up, as long as your well versed in various aspects of Arthuriana this is a fairly good book to peruse all in all. If not,it wouldn't be a good idea to start with this.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on July 15, 1998
Format: Paperback
The notion that the legends of King Arthur were impacted by history from northern Britain is a completely defensible position with a great deal of research and archaeological evidence to support it. Unfortunately, Dr. Goodrich seems to be oblivious to what Arthurian scholars are doing even though she cites several of their books in her bibliography. The text is riddled with errors, inaccuracies and misrepresentations. In the first few pages Dr. Goodrich claims that she is the first to offer proof of an historical Arthur (She needs to recheck her bibliography.), accepts a twelfth-century forgery as an actual relic (the infamous Excalibur forgery), accepts proof on the basis of etymology alone, decides it's important that we don't know precisely how to spell Guinevere's name (Spelling wasn't standardized until well after the Middle Ages and names continued to vary long after that.), says that Thesus pulled a sword from a stone (He didn't.), ignores the possibility of &! ! quot;Artorius" as an origin for Arthur's name, and claims that Gildas "first testified to the historicity of Arthur" (Gildas's failure to mention Arthur is one of the major arguments against his historicity.). The rest of the book is no better. Educators should be familiar with the text so that they know where students' erroneous ideas about Arthur come from, but the book should definitely be read with the idea that Dr. Goodrich is presenting fiction, not fact.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?