Most Helpful Customer Reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good Adventure Novel, August 8, 2003
This review is from: Kingdom River (The Snowfall Trilogy, Book 2) (Hardcover)
This is a good adventure novel set in a future where the Earth is in the grip of an Ice Age. Civilization has crumbled and been succeeded by a variety of pre-industrial societies. This is the second book in a trilogy about North America. This book is the story of an alliance between 2 of these societies against a third pre-industrial culture, a Mongol-like horde that has crossed Beringia to conquer western North America. The story is a relatively conventional military campaign concluding with a reconstruction of the battle of Cannae. The plot has the usual romantic elements. Smith does a good job of presenting believable characters and his future Earth is interesting and described well. This book is not, however, as good as its predecessor, Snowfall. The quality of writing and plotting is better in Snowfall, which has a less conventional story line and gives a better sense of life in a barbarous age.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A letdown after the top notch first book, December 21, 2009
Having given Snowfall, the first in this series, 5 stars, it is a bit disappointing that I can only give Kingdom River a grudging 3 stars. I love fantasy books, and the idea of this series, of a civilization in the future that can only glimpse our knowledge via hand copied books that are carefully guarded treasures, it a quite riveting concept...or at least it could have been. I still highly recommend Snowfall, but this second book just lost the magic, devolving into a book about a war, which to me misses the boat entirely.
What hooked me in Snowfall was that it was different, painting a new ice age where civilization has devolved into mainly tribal cultures, with vastly altered social norms, universal suspicion of outsiders and a way of life that sucks a reader into a new reality. That was the promise the author dangles in front of me, and I really hoped that the unique peculiarities of this new world, still geographically the US but yet unrecognizable in its peoples and customs, would be further explored in the second book of the series. Alas, not to be.
Where the author went astray in this very readable but ultimately disappointing novel is that the exploration of new customs and cultures is only a mere backdrop. It's about fighting, warfare, military strategies and political alliances. Sure, it is still set in the same future, but whereas the geography and lifestyle in this new world order was a central and fascinating part of the first book, in Kingdom River it is just the setting for battles and bloodshed. Interesting, but I can get that in loads of books, and what I really wanted was to explore this new world and get more juicy details about how life is different in this new and sudden ice age.
My criticisms notwithstanding, this series does portray an interesting possible future, even if it is an improbable future. While I think that the likelihood of civilization devolving to the spears and bows and arrows just a couple hundred years after a quick ice age descends on the planet is slim or even laughable, that doesn't take away from the fun of it all. Just wish this book had more meat on its bones.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Overly long, but entertaining, June 11, 2004
This is an entertaining read, but it's not as good as the first book in the series, Snowfall. Once again Mitchell does a good job of bringing us into the lives and world of a post apocalyptic future. However, where Snowfall was a portrait of a small band of people fleeing to survive, Kingdom River tries to work on a grand, clash of armies, scale. The result is that the characters are less vivid and there is a lot of repetition. On the repetition front, the strategy to be used in Monroe's fight against the Khan is explained, in detail, no less than three times. Does the reader really need to be reminded that many times? There are several references to curses that "a few decades earlier would have meant death". OK, we get it, times change, even in this world. But do we need to be told the same thing again and again? Mitchell also leaves many things unexplained. He doesn't try to explain the range of deities (Weather, Mountain Jesus, Floating Jesus etc.), content to let them be just part of the world. That's fine. On the other hand, he doesn't explain why Monroe lets the Boston ambassadress into his camp. There is no strategic or tactical advantage in allowing her in and Monroe repeatedly shows that he is always considering the implications of his actions. The ambassadress is a minor character that does nothing to advance the plot. She feels like an after thought thrown in to let the story be more "science fiction". Maybe there will be a pay off in the third book. One more minor annoyance - the narrative is constantly making references to "fine warm-time phrases". Maybe Mitchell is simply pointing out words and phrases that he really likes, but it's really hard to believe that these people would be constantly reflecting on their usage of the language. This is a fun read, but it could have used another round of edits to tighten it up.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|