Buy Used
$7.65
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Shared Knowledge is a not for profit public charity! Check us out on facebook. We provide funding for educational programs in Richmond, Virginia. PLEASE READ FULL DESCRIPTION -USED GOOD- This book has been read and may show wear to the cover and or pages. There may be some dog-eared pages. In some cases the internal pages may contain highlighting/margin notes/underlining or any combination of these markings. The binding will be secure in all cases. This is a good reading and studying copy and has been verified that all pages are legible and intact. If the book contained a CD it is not guaranteed to still be included. Your purchase directly supports our scholarship program as well as our partner charities. All items are packed and shipped from the Amazon warehouse. Thanks so much for your purchase!
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Kings of Tort Hardcover – January 1, 2009


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$25.82 $3.68
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 288 pages
  • Publisher: Pediment Publishing; First Edition edition (2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1597252441
  • ISBN-13: 978-1597252447
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.1 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,747,944 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

3.4 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful By An attorney and art lover on December 7, 2009
Format: Hardcover
The Scruggs Scandal has been a never-ending source of interest for Mississippians, and particularly for the members of Mississippi's legal community.

"Kings of Tort" presents the sordid facts, most already in the public record, in a coherent narrative told from the prosecutor's point of view.

People who have closely followed this scandal for a while will find little new information; those new to the scandal will likely be amazed. It is quite a story.

The book actually attempts to cover two unrelated crimes, one attributed to Paul Minor and the other to Scruggs and his co-conspirators. Dawson was the lead prosecutor in the Scruggs case, and he has a great deal of first hand information about the investigation and prosecution of that crime. The authors are less knowledgeable about the Minor prosecution, and that shows.

The book is marred by one startlingly vulgar "quote" attributed to Minor. This quote did not advance the narrative at all. It appears to me to be a gratutious cheap shot intended to embarrass and demean Minor. The remark is one neither of the authors could have heard first hand, and, as far as I can tell, the only citation that supports the accuracy of this "quote" is to Lange's own blog.

The book leaves unanswered many questions concerning the actions of P. L. Blake, an individual who worked closely with Scruggs and who collected $50 million for services he performed while the tobacco litigation was pending, servoces that both Blake and Scruggs have found difficult to identify or explain. The book also leaves unanswered many questions about the grant of immunity given to Ed Peters, one of the participants in the attempt to bribe Judge DeLaughter (Scruggs II).
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
21 of 25 people found the following review helpful By Northside Sun on December 3, 2009
Format: Hardcover
David Sanders

In March of 2007, when Judge Henry L. Lackey perceived that he had been offered a bribe to influence him in a case before his court, he faced a quandary. Lackey was a judge in the sprawling Third Circuit of Mississippi, comprising the counties of Benton, Calhoun, Chickasaw, Lafayette, Marshall, Tippah and Union in north Mississippi. The initial approach had come from Timothy Balducci, a young lawyer whom Lackey had mentored early in Balducci's career. The inducement offered was an "of counsel" position in Balducci's law firm whenever the septuagenarian judge chose to retire from the bench. But Lackey knew that the offer was made on behalf of Richard L. `Dickie' Scruggs, a litigant in a legal-fees dispute before Lackey's court and the universally-acknowledged 800-pound gorilla of tort litigation in Mississippi.

Hence, Judge Lackey's quandary: his first inclination was to report his suspicions to state authorities. But this would bring the information to the attention of Attorney General Jim Hood. In a telling sign of the rot and cronyism that had already infected the legal system in Mississippi, Lackey knew that Hood -- and his predecessor, Mike Moore - had been allies and virtual tools of Scruggs and the plaintiffs' bar in shaking down the tobacco industry and attempting to do the same to the insurance industry in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Lackey wisely decided to take his information to Tom Dawson and John Hailman of the office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Mississippi in Oxford. The judge thus set in motion a chain of events that would dominate the remaining 21 months of Dawson's tenure as First Assistant U.S. Attorney, while having profound consequences for all of the other players involved.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By chuck geerhart on January 17, 2011
Format: Hardcover
"Kings of Tort" was written by Allan Lange, a political blogger, and Tom Dawson, one of the federal prosecutors who handled the Dickie Scruggs case. There is no denying that the Scruggs case has it all: high flying, rich trial lawyers, venal judges, and various other Machiavellian types. But this book is so poorly organized and written that it takes all the fun out of the scandal! For starters, there are the typos. I counted at least five (including a few that spellcheck would have caught if used). That's annoying, especially in a book that runs only 255 pages. Also, if you're writing about law, you should know that "tortious" is not the same as "tortuous," which happens early in the book. But the real problem with this book is organization. There appears to have been no editor, based on the opening acknowledgements. So, dear reader, you have to read the same stuff over and over. Characters are re-introduced multiple times. Facts are repeated. Repeatedly. Then there's the creeping bias in favor of the Feds and against anyone else. I know a federal prosecutor wrote the book (and some of his insights into how plea bargains works are quite useful), but toward the end the book turns into a paean to the glory of federal prosecutors. Example from page 237, concerning Dickie Scruggs' apparent hope that prosecutors would leave him alone after he pled guilty in his first case: "Scruggs misjudged the resolve of the U.S. Attorney's Office. Prosecutors aren't in the business of counting scalps on a lodgepole. They use the evidence in a case to uphold the law." Would that this generality were true of all U.S. Attorneys, but we need look no further than the Ted Stevens Alaska bribery case to see that it's not. So, in short, this Grishamesque tale of sordid lawyer conduct is worth reading about, but it would have better if Grisham (who knew Scruggs well) had written it.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?