Knights Templar [Hardcover]

Stephen Howarth (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: May 1982

Here is a complete account of one of the strangest phenomena of Medieval history: The Poor Fellow Soldiers of Christ, the Knights of The Temple of Solomon- more popularly known as The Knights Templar. In their brotherhood, the Knights united two conflicting medieval ideals, for they were both monks and warriors, committed to God and commited to war. Charting the rise and fall of The Order, tracing the lives and deaths of its members, examining the motives of its supporters and opponents, Stephen Howarth cuts through the myths and legends and sets out the true historical facts. >

--This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Stephen Howarth is a professional historian and author. He comes from a family of teachers and writers. His first book was a history of the Koh-i.Noor diamond (Quartet) He is a fellow of thew Royal Geographical Society. --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Product Details

• Hardcover: 321 pages
• Publisher: Macmillan Pub Co; First edition. edition (May 1982)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0689111851
• ISBN-13: 978-0689111853
• Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.3 x 1.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.5 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (10 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #4,272,957 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Don't buy if you're looking for a conspiracy theory, March 3, 2006

By 

Jesse Rouse (Kenosha, WI) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Knights Templar (Hardcover)

This was an excellent history of the Templars and the Crusades. No conspiracy theories are present; Howarth just gives the known history of the Templars, and he does it in a very, very good manner. This was the most interesting history book that I have ever read, and one of the most enjoyable books I can ever remember reading. I had no idea the Crusades were so interesting before reading this book. Stories like King Richard (the Lion-Hearted) trying to steal a peasant's hawk and almost getting killed by the owner make this book a delight to read. Reynald de Chatillion and Richard were definitely the best characters in this book. Their exploits are simply amazing (and hilarious). I got this book to study the Templars and ended up getting so interested in the Crusades that I got some more books on the subject.

As for the content about the Templars, I cannot imagine a better presentation of their deeds. He does not hypothesize about their having the Holy Grail or the Ark of the Covenant; he simply gives what we know with reasonable certaintly about the development and actions of the Knights Templar, and he does not give it in a vacuum as conspiracy theorists do. Conspiracy theory books about the Templar tend to just report the Templar's deeds and take them out of context. Howarth gives the context. In fact, he gives about as much context as he does actual information about the Templars. Conspiracy theory books point to the fact that the Templars got away with nearly anything as evidence that they had some dirt on the Catholic Church. Unfortunately, they fail to mention that anyone else also got away with nearly anything back then: Crusading kings (i.e. Richard) would sack Christian cities on the way to the crusade and receive not even a scolding. This context is important for understand the Templars. They cannot be viewed in a vacuum, or else conspiracy theories start popping up. They look very strange to us nowadays, but when looked at in the company of other Medieval events and people, they look far more normal.

To the best of my knowledge, Howarth is very accurate in his presentation of the Templars (I especially liked his treatment of the Templar trials when the order was dissolved by Pope Clement). He cites a large number of primary sources, and I do not think that he makes conclusions beyond the merits of the evidence. If you are interested in studying the Knights Templar, this is an excellent book to begin with. With the context that this book provides, you will be able to critically examine the claims made about the Templar by other authors. The only complaint I have is that it should have included a map of the Holy Land.

Overall grade: A+

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Introducing...the Templar Knights! [applause], August 21, 2005

By 

TrezKu13 (Norfolk, VA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Knights Templar (Hardcover)

As other reviewers have said before me, this is pretty much a book to introduce someone to the legend and history of the Templar Knights. I could sense that reading the book myself, and I even had an incident where I was reading this book in a hotel lobby - the clerk told me he had read it, and it indeed skips through much of Templar history.

Does this mean its a bad read? Well, no not really, in fact it's quite a good read for any one who wants to read non-fiction and doesn't want to sit through 500 pages. Stephen Howarth weaves events and characters well, and keeps you turning the page like any author should. The only problem is, as I already suggested, it tends to glance over much of the church's order. The strongest points in the book are the opening, (with a great description of Philip and his executions) the rise of the Order, and the very end when the Templars are betrayed by church and nobility alike. Much of the pages inbetween these sections focus on Medieval and Crusade history. Now, it's all well and good to explain the time period to the read and make sure they understand the current timeline, but sometimes I wondered just how much we needed to know. Reading about Crusaders pirating down the Red Sea for several pages made me wonder just what the heck it had to do with the Templar Knights. All I understood about the Templar role in the Crusades was 1) they defended travellers, 2) they defended castles, and 3) they were often scapegoats. And lots of the latter, apparently. Howarth spends half the book apologizing for the order or saying something along the lines of, "Well, OK, just because they did this doesn't mean they were bad, someone did it worse..."

This book has made me interested in going out and buying other books on the Templar Knights, and like I said I enjoyed reading it. However, if you already have some knowledge of the Crusades or the Templar Order itself, then you may want to skip it.

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Knights Templar 101, April 27, 2005

By 

Barnes and Noble Junkie (Barnes And Noble, Midlothian, Virginia) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Knights Templar (Hardcover)

Dan Brown's 'Da Vinci Code' while entertaining, has had the unfortunate effect that many of the so-called 'historical' books written today are based more on assumptions and opinions than on facts.

Brown's book has inspired renewed interest in the Knights Templar, the Holy Grail, Freemasons etc etc.. And with this renewed interest comes people ready to capitalize on it.. and in order to sell books, the themes surrounding them have become more and more outrageous.

Fortunately, this book was written 2 decades before Brown's book, and you can be assured that this is a fact based book, and not one of conjecture.

To someone who has knowledge about the cruisades and the Knights Templar, this would probably be a very boring book. However, since this is the first book that I have read about the Knights Templar, and one of the first that I have read about the crusades, I really enjoyed it.

Having said that, I must add that even though this book is really a 'Knights Templar for Dummies' we aren't treated like dummies. There is one (count it - 1) map, and that is barely legible. I had to get out other maps and atlases to help me figure out exactly where these places were.

In addition, while other books (See Dungeon, Fire, and Sword by Robinson) have lists and tables helping the reader identify who is who, this book has nothing...

This book was interesting enough to make me want to delve deeper into the cruisades and the KT, so much so that the next book that I read was also a book about the KT.